Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/921,176

DYNAMIC SESSION MANAGEMENT FOR ONLINE COLLABORATION PLATFORMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Examiner
THIEU, BENJAMIN M
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 620 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 620 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 16, 2026 has been entered. Claim(s) 1-20 have been canceled. Claim(s) 21-40 have been added. Therefore, Claim(s) 21-40 is/are pending and have been considered as follows. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21, 28, and 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Campbell et al. (US 2011/0145725 A1, hereinafter Campbell). As to New Claim 21, Campbell discloses a computer-based method of dynamically managing sessions for online collaboration platforms, the method comprising: receiving real-time and historical data relating to an online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Figs. 12, 15B; [0007, 0095, 0103]), where Campbell discloses receiving data relating to a online collaboration session (i.e. collaborative writing surface).); tagging one or more items of content accessed during the online collaboration platform session and one or more actions of a first plurality of users, and associating the tagged one or more items of content and the tagged one or more actions with the online collaboration platform session in a table ((Campbell; [0095, 0119]), where Campbell discloses the ability to include tags associated with the writing content.); and determining whether at least one first tagged item of content of the tagged one or more items of content changes after a conclusion of the online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Fig. 12; [0108, 0110-0113]), where Campbell discloses determining if the marking of the content has changed or needs to be updated after the session has concluded.). As to New Claim 28, Campbell discloses a computer system, the computer system comprising: one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories, one or more computer-readable tangible storage medium, and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more computer-readable tangible storage medium for execution by at least one of the one or more processors via at least one of the one or more computer-readable memories (Campbell; Fig. 1; [0047]), herein the computer system is capable of performing a method comprising: receiving real-time and historical data relating to an online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Figs. 12, 15B; [0007, 0095, 0103]), where Campbell discloses receiving data relating to a online collaboration session (i.e. collaborative writing surface).); tagging one or more items of content accessed during the online collaboration platform session and one or more actions of a first plurality of users, and associating the tagged one or more items of content and the tagged one or more actions with the online collaboration platform session in a table ((Campbell; [0095, 0119]), where Campbell discloses the ability to include tags associated with the writing content.); and determining whether at least one first tagged item of content of the tagged one or more items of content changes after a conclusion of the online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Fig. 12; [0108, 0110-0113]), where Campbell discloses determining if the marking of the content has changed or needs to be updated after the session has concluded.). As to New Claim 35, Campbell discloses a computer program product, the computer program product comprising: one or more computer-readable tangible storage medium and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more computer-readable tangible storage medium, the program instructions executable by a processor capable of performing a method (Campbell; Fig. 1; [0047]), the method comprising: receiving real-time and historical data relating to an online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Figs. 12, 15B; [0007, 0095, 0103]), where Campbell discloses receiving data relating to a online collaboration session (i.e. collaborative writing surface).); tagging one or more items of content accessed during the online collaboration platform session and one or more actions of a first plurality of users, and associating the tagged one or more items of content and the tagged one or more actions with the online collaboration platform session in a table ((Campbell; [0095, 0119]), where Campbell discloses the ability to include tags associated with the writing content.); and determining whether at least one first tagged item of content of the tagged one or more items of content changes after a conclusion of the online collaboration platform session ((Campbell; Fig. 12; [0108, 0110-0113]), where Campbell discloses determining if the marking of the content has changed or needs to be updated after the session has concluded.). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 22-27, 29-34, and 36-40 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. The examiner also requests, in response to this Office action, support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line no(s) in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the examiner in prosecuting the application. When responding to this office action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M THIEU whose telephone number is (571) 270-7475 and fax number is (571) 270-8475. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Gillis can be reached at 571-272-7952. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN M THIEU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2446 6.12.2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684029
Location-Based Playlist Generation
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676909
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSMITTING PERIODIC DISCONNECT PEER REQUESTS BASED ON GRACEFUL CONNECTION CYCLING
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677183
NETWORK EDGE CLOUD ADJUSTMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665779
ONLINE CONFERENCE APPARATUS AND ONLINE CONFERENCE METHOD
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12639391
BROWSER BASED FEEDBACK FOR OPTIMIZED WEB BROWSING
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 620 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month