Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/921,258

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Examiner
LIN, HANG
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
295 granted / 455 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 455 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/20/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment In an Amendment filed 02/20/2026, claims 1 and 15 have been amended, claims 17 has been cancelled, and claims 21-24 are newly added. Currently, claims 1-11,14-16 and 18-24 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 15-16, 18-19 and 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Song et al. (US 20210335238 A1). Regarding claim 15, Song teaches a display device, comprising: a substrate; a photo sensing transistor on the substrate; (Para 74, 106-108. Base substrate. Photo sensing transistor D1) a reflective layer on the photo sensing transistor; and a light emitting diode on the reflective layer, the reflective layer being under a bottommost surface of the light emitting diode, wherein the reflective layer includes an opaque conductive layer with an opening, the opening overlapping the photo sensing transistor and the light emitting diode. (Fig. 6 shows PDL between D1 and D2. Para 74, 120-126. Base substrate. Reflective layer PLD. Please note that any material is reflective to a degree, and is conductive to a degree. PDL is under E1 which is the bottommost surface when the device is turned over.) Regarding claim 16, Song already teaches the display device of claim 15, and Song further teaches wherein the photo sensing transistor is configured to sense light emitted from the light emitting diode and incident on the photo sensing transistor through the opening. (Fig. 6 shows PDL between D1 and D2. Para 74, 120-126, 70-105, 134-153.) Regarding claim 18, Song already teaches the display device of claim 15, and Song further teaches further comprising: a light shielding layer disposed between the substrate and the photo sensing transistor, wherein the light shielding layer overlaps the photo sensing transistor. (Para 113) Regarding claim 19, Song already teaches the display device of claim 15, And Song further teaches further comprising: a driving transistor on the substrate and electrically connected to the light emitting diode. (fig. 4: driving transistor TD) Regarding claim 21, Song already teaches the display device of claim 15, And Song further teaches wherein the reflective layer is electrically connected to the light emitting diode. (Fig. 6: PDL electrically connected to E1/D2) Regarding claim 22, Song already teaches the display device of claim 15, And Song further teaches an insulating layer on the reflective layer and covering at least a portion of a side surface of the light emitting diode. (Para 177. Fig. 6: OC layer on the reflective layer PDL and covering at least a portion of a side surface of the light emitting diode D2) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 1-11, 14 and 23-24 allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Independent claim 1 distinctly features: “a display panel including a plurality of sub pixels, at least one of the sub pixels including: a light emitting diode configured to emit light; a light emitting circuit configured to drive the light emitting diode; a sensing circuit including a photo sensing transistor configured to sense light emitted from the light emitting diode; and a reflective layer disposed between the photo sensing transistor and the light emitting diode, the reflective layer being disposed closer to the photo sensing transistor than a surface of the light emitting diode closest to the photo sensing transistor is, wherein the reflective layer includes an opaque conductive layer with an opening, the opening overlapping the photo sensing transistor and the light emitting diode” The closest prior arts Song et al. (US 20210335238 A1) teaches OLED device stack configuration as shown in paragraphs 134-153 and figures 6, and Cheng et al. (US 20130093729 A1) teaches touchscreen utilizing photo transistor detection mechanism as shown in paragraphs 5-8 and figures 2-3. However it either singularly or in combination, fail to fully anticipate or render the above underlined limitations obvious which show OLED display stack configuration as outlined above. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HANG LIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7596. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached on 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HANG LIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 30, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579932
DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE FOR A DISPLAY PANEL, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562131
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12547261
Rotary Control Input Device for a Capacitive Touch Screen
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548504
DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525160
ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+0.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 455 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month