Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/921,455

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING DEVICE, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Priority
Jun 14, 2018 — provisional 62/685,016 +4 more
Examiner
CHIO, TAT CHI
Art Unit
2486
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
624 granted / 856 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
897
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 856 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/22/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that claim 1 recites the omitted essential steps. Applicant cited features of claim 1: 1) the selected prediction mode being selected from two or more prediction modes, based on a total number of the two or more prediction modes; 2) the two or more prediction modes each being for selecting a three-dimensional point which is to be referenced when a predicted value of an attribute information item of a first three-dimensional point is calculated; 3) the total number of the two or more prediction modes being determined in response to a number of one or more second three-dimensional points including the three-dimensional point neighboring the first three-dimensional point; 4) the one or more second three-dimensional points being available to be referenced when the predicted value is calculated. In response, the examiner respectfully disagrees. These features of claim 1 are recited in passive voice. Under the broadest reasonable interpretation, these features can be interpreted as the characteristics of the information (bitstream) rather than active steps that performs the essential of the method claim. It is unclear whether these steps are performed before, during, or after the encoding process. If applicant intends these steps are part of the encoding process, applicant is strongly recommended to consider rewriting these features in active voice. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 5/22/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US 11412208 B2 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. The terminal disclaimer filed on 5/22/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US 11716459 B2 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. The terminal disclaimer filed on 5/22/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US 12166964 B2 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: 1) selecting prediction mode; 2) calculating a predicted value of an attribute information item of a first three-dimensional point; 3) determining the total number of the two or more prediction modes; 4) referencing the one or more second three-dimensional points. In other words, the essential steps of the encoding method are omitted. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4 allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAT CHI CHIO whose telephone number is (571)272-9563. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 10am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAMIE J ATALA can be reached at 571-272-7384. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAT C CHIO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707034
VIRTUAL REALITY FILM HYBRIDIZATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707084
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CODING THE GEOMETRY OF A POINT CLOUD
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701230
RESIDUAL CODING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695908
ADAPTIVE LINEAR LIFTING TRANSFORM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684199
USER CONTROL FOR DISPLAYING TAGS ASSOCIATED WITH ITEMS IN A VIDEO PLAYBACK
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.4%)
3y 3m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 856 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month