Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/921,469

COMPOSITION MATERIAL FOR ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS, AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Examiner
YOUNG, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dupont Specialty Materials Korea Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
365 granted / 681 resolved
-11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
727
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 681 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Detailed Action The following Office action concerns Patent Application Number 18/921,469. Claims 1-12 are pending in the application. Claims 2-8, 11, 12 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected species. The applicant’s amendment filed December 10, 2025 has been entered. The previous grounds of rejection under 35 USC 112 are withdrawn in light of the applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 9, 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al (US 2017/0170408) in view of Jang et al (KR 2015-0121337). Park et al teaches an organic electroluminescent device comprising two or more host materials in a light-emitting layer (par. 8). One of the host materials is the compound: PNG media_image1.png 156 237 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein La is a bond and Ma is a heteroaryl group (par. 12-14). The above compound satisfies claimed formula (2). Park et al does not teach a host material of claimed formula (1-2). However, Jang et al teaches a host material having the formula: PNG media_image2.png 157 158 media_image2.png Greyscale (page 4). The above compound satisfies formula (1-2) with “M” being N-aryl, “Y9” and “Y10” being CR1 with R1 being an arylamino group shared by “Y9” and “Y10.” The remaining “Y” groups are all CH in the above compound. The host compound provides high luminous efficiency, low driving voltage and improved lifetime of an organic electroluminescent device (par. 8-9). A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine the host compound of Jang et al with the organic electroluminescent device of Park et al in order to obtain high luminous efficiency, low driving voltage and improved lifetime of the device. Response to Arguments The applicant argues that the amendment to claim 1 requires that R1’s in Y9 and Y10 may not be fused together to form a ring. However, no such limitation appears in claim 1. Therefore, the argument is not persuasive. Amended claim 2 is now drawn to formula (1-1), which is a non-elected species by the applicant’s election of species of July 15, 2025. Conclusion No new ground of rejection was presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Examiner’s Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Young whose telephone number is (571) 270-5078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000./WILLIAM D YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 January 16, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 14, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603192
CONDUCTIVE RESIN COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590200
Polyester Compositions Including Carbon Nanotubes as Microwave Absorbers in Sensor Applications
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573564
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573521
Elastomeric Conductive Composite Interconnect
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552972
CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 681 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month