Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/921,579

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT FOR CONSISTENT CONTENT UPDATING USING A GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORK

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Examiner
GIULIANI, GIUSEPPI J
Art Unit
2153
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
167 granted / 289 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 289 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prosecution history and applicant's reply make evident reasons for allowance, satisfying the record "record as a whole" as required by rule 37 CFR 1.104(e). In this case, the substance of applicant's remarks and the amendments herein made to the claims clarifying the claimed invention indicate the reasons claims are patentable over the prior art of record. Further search and consideration was given, however no prior art resulting from the search was found which could fairly teach or suggest the claimed invention. Accordingly, the claims 1-8 and 10-25 are allowed. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9 recites “the set of edges request graph” in line 2. For clarity purposes, the examiner recommends amending the claim to recite “the sets of edges of the request graph”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the edges connecting one or more pairs of nodes in the request graph" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate action is required. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Giuseppi Giuliani whose telephone number is (571)270-7128. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kavita Stanley can be reached at (571)272-8352. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GIUSEPPI GIULIANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2153
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675463
APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN EVENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675393
EFFICIENT BURST SORT BASED ON NETWORK-ATTACHED MEMORY
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12639293
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PAGINATING SEARCH RESULTS RETRIEVED FROM DATABASES THAT SUPPORT CURSOR-BASED PAGINATION
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632499
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING GRAPH DATA STRUCTURES
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12613916
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO INCREASE VIEWERSHIP OF ONLINE CONTENT
5y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+6.6%)
3y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 289 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month