Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/921,843

DYNAMIC CLIENT BUFFERING AND ADJUSTED TIMING OF CLIENT VSYNC SIGNAL FOR CLOUD GAMING

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Priority
Oct 01, 2019 — provisional 62/909,142 +6 more
Examiner
ELISCA, PIERRE E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1402 granted / 1555 resolved
+30.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1569
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§103
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1555 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. This communication is responsive to application 18/921,843 filed on 10/21/2024. 3. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. 4. This application is a continuation of U.S. application No. 17/468,512 filed on 09/07/2021 now U.S Patent 11,701,584 See MPEP 201.07. In accordance with MPEP 609.02 A.2 and MPEP 2001.06 (b) (last paragraph), the Examiner has reviewed and considered the prior art cited in the Parent Application. Also in accordance with MPEP 2001.06 (b) (last paragraph), all documents cited or considered ‘of record’ in the Parent Application are now considered cited or ‘of record’ in this application. Additionally, Applicant(s) are reminded that a listing of the information cited or ‘of record’ in the Patent Application need not be resubmitted in this application unless Applicants desire the information to be printed on a patent issuing from this application. See MPEP 609.02 A. 2. Finally, Applicants are reminded that the prosecution history of the Patent Application is relevant in this application. Double Patenting 5. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970);and, In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.130(b). Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-20 are rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No.11,701,584. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to those in possession of the invention defined by claims 1-20 to observe that the limitations described in claims 1-20 are already incorporated in claim 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No.11,701,584. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would have realized that by omission of the limitations of:” generating at the client a plurality of client timestamps corresponding to when each of the plurality of compressed video frames is decoded” is an obvious expedient since the remaining elements perform the same functions as before. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184 (CCPA 1963. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to PIERRE E ELISCA whose telephone number is (571) 272-6706. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday -Thursday; 6:30AM- 7:30PM. Hoteler. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Hu Kang can be reached on 571 270 1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PIERRE E ELISCA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667771
PICKLEBALL PLAYER STATISTICS TRACKING DEVICE AND METHOD
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656126
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658071
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VIRTUAL SIGN LANGUAGE AVATAR INTERPRETER
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658007
SYSTEM, METHOD AND INTERFACE FOR PLAYING AN ONLINE POKER GAME UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651534
HOLISTIC STUDENT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK BASED ON MULTI-TASK LEARNING
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1555 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month