Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/922,887

SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF LEGIBLY CAPTURING VEHICLE MARKINGS

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Oct 22, 2024
Priority
Sep 19, 2016 — continuation of 10/521,675 +3 more
Examiner
SHAHNAMI, AMIR
Art Unit
2483
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Digital Ally Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
357 granted / 439 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
464
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
79.4%
+39.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 439 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-19, 21-23 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim to a continuation of US APP 15/269144 filed on 9/19/2016. Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments, see Claims and Arguments, filed 3/20/2026, with respect to the 35 USC 103 rejections of claims 1, 8, 15 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 35 USC 103 rejections of claims of 1, 8, 15 have been withdrawn. Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper time-wise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g In re Berg, 140F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528,163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on non-statutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(l) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms.Thefiling date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AI A/25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-l.jsp. Claim 1-5, 7-11, 13-19, 21-23 are rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 3, 5-8, 11-15, 17-25 of U.S. Patent No. 12,154,345. Although the claims at issue are not identical because the present invention claims the value of the at least one recording attribute is adjusted based on random non-uniform increments, which is not claimed in the US Patent. However, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they both claim recording video data based on predefined standard recording attributes; detecting a visual marking within the video data; adjusting a value of at least one recording attribute of the video recording device within a scan range for the at least one recording attribute; and recording updated video data using the value, as adjusted, of the at least one recording attribute such that a legible indication of the visual marking has been captured within the updated video data. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-19, 21-23 would be allowable if it overcame the double patent rejection provided. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMIR SHAHNAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-0707. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571-272-7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMIR SHAHNAMI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684138
VIDEO CODING METHOD, ENCODER AND DECODER
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671808
IMAGE DECODING DEVICE, IMAGE DECODING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659471
METHOD, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657931
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, GENERATION METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659521
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 439 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month