Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/923,437

METHODS, APPARATUSES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROVIDING ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 22, 2024
Priority
Oct 24, 2023 — provisional 63/592,834
Examiner
ZHU, QIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 631 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to communications filed 10/22/2024: Claims 1-20 are pending Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 20 recites “the at least on sensor…” should be “the at least one sensor….” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 9-16, and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Khaleghimeybodi et al (US20220201403, hereinafter “Khaleghimeybodi”). Regarding claim 1, Khaleghimeybodi teaches a method (¶6, method) comprising: detecting, by at least one microphone of an apparatus, at least one audio signal comprising audio content output from at least one speaker and other audio data from one or more other sources, or caused by the one or more other sources, wherein the other audio data comprises determined undesirable vibration noise causing distortion of the at least one audio signal (Fig. 2, sensory array for detecting sounds within a local area (¶57) and a transducer array configured to present audio content for the user (¶53, 56) and an optical microphone assembly 222 capable of detecting vibrations of the skin resulting from sounds in the local area (¶58); the vibrations resulting from the other sources in the local area can be considered noise and therefore cause distortion of the desired content (¶47, 72)); determining, by at least one sensor device of the apparatus, at least a subset of the other audio data based in part on determining at least one motion of a user of the apparatus, or motion of one or more other users (¶72, Fig. 2, the processing module 275 (in conjunction with the optical microphone/sensor) is capable of isolating and filtering out frequency components corresponding to motion noise); and removing or reducing, based on the determined at least one subset of the other audio data, the determined undesirable vibration noise from the at least one audio signal to enable output of sound associated with a modification of the at least one audio signal (Fig. 2, ¶72, 80-82, processing module capable of isolating and filtering out frequency components corresponding to motion noise and further able to provide active noise cancellation by providing a modified output signal corresponding to the desired audio content). Regarding claim 2, Khaleghimeybodi teaches further comprising: causing output, by the at least one speaker or a second speaker, of the modification of the at least one audio signal being free from comprising the determined undesirable vibration noise, or comprises a reduction in noise of the determined undesirable vibration noise (Fig. 2, ¶72, 80-82, processing module capable of isolating and filtering out frequency components corresponding to motion noise and further able to provide active noise cancellation by providing a modified output signal corresponding to the desired audio content). Regarding claim 3, Khaleghimeybodi teaches further comprising: determining that the subset of the other data comprises at least one of a self-voice of a voice of the user or the one or more other users, or one or more items of body noise associated with one or more detected movements of one or more body parts of the user or the one or more other users (Fig. 2, ¶72, 80-82, processing module capable of isolating and filtering out frequency components corresponding to motion noise and further able to provide active noise cancellation by providing a modified output signal corresponding to the desired audio content; ¶26, the microphone array is also able to detect sounds in the local area including the user’s own voice or sounds from other sources (for cancellation and/or enhancement)). Regarding claim 4, Khaleghimeybodi teaches further comprising: determining that the subset of the other data comprises one or more items of environment noise associated with a background of a real world environment that the user is located within (¶47, 81, detecting sound sources can include background noises in the environment). Regarding claim 5, Khaleghimeybodi teaches further comprising: determining that the at least one sensor device is located within a predetermined distance to a location of the at least one microphone (Fig. 2, all modules are mounted in place on the head mounted device). Regarding claim 6, Khaleghimeybodi teaches wherein the apparatus comprises at least one of an artificial reality device, a head-mounted display, or smart glasses (Figs. 1A-1B, head-mounted device). Regarding claim 9, Khaleghimeybodi teaches wherein the at least one sensor comprises at least one of an inertial measurement unit or an accelerometer (¶49, inertial measurement unit (IMU)). Regarding claim 10, Khaleghimeybodi teaches wherein the at least one audio signal is associated with a conversation of the user with the one or more other users (¶25, 84, the detected sound sources can include user’s own voice and other people). Regarding claims 11-16, they are rejected similarly as claims 1-6, respectively. The apparatus can be found in Khaleghimeybodi (abstract, system). Regarding claim 19, Khaleghimeybodi teaches a method (¶6, method) comprising: detecting, by at least one microphone of an apparatus, at least one audio signal comprising audio content output from at least one speaker and other audio data from one or more other sources, or caused by the one or more other sources, wherein the other audio data comprises determined undesirable vibration noise causing distortion of the at least one audio signal (Fig. 2, sensory array for detecting sounds within a local area (¶57) and a transducer array configured to present audio content for the user (¶53, 56) and an optical microphone assembly 222 capable of detecting vibrations of the skin resulting from sounds in the local area (¶58); the vibrations resulting from the other sources in the local area can be considered noise and therefore cause distortion of the desired content (¶47, 72)); determining, by at least one sensor device of the apparatus, at least one anti-vibration signal (¶116, active noise cancellation being performed); and applying the at least one anti-vibration signal to the determined undesirable vibration noise to remove, or reduce, the determined undesirable vibration noise from the at least one audio signal to enable output of sound associated with a modification of the at least one audio signal (Fig. 2, ¶72, 80-82, processing module capable of isolating and filtering out frequency components corresponding to motion noise and further able to provide active noise cancellation by providing a modified output signal corresponding to the desired audio content). Regarding claim 20, Khaleghimeybodi teaches wherein, the at least on sensor comprises at least one of an audio band shaker or a transducer (¶81, modified output comprises the desired output in conjunction with the cancellation/suppression signal). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Khaleghimeybodi et al (US20220201403, hereinafter “Khaleghimeybodi”) in view of Painter et al (US20250104687, hereinafter “Painter”). Regarding claim 7, Khaleghimeybodi fails to explicitly teach wherein: the removing, or the reducing, of the determined undesirable vibration noise comprises minimizing distortion, interference, or jitter associated with one or more other sensors of the apparatus. Painter teaches wherein: the removing, or the reducing, of the determined undesirable vibration noise comprises minimizing distortion, interference, or jitter associated with one or more other sensors of the apparatus (¶34, 42, Fig. 3, parasitic vibrations can cause undesired vibrations on one or more other sensors and therefore the invention seeks to minimize the undesired vibrations on the other sensors). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the head-mounted audio system (as taught by Khaleghimeybodi) with the parasitic vibration reduction system (as taught by Painter). The rationale to do so is to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield the predictable result of improving sensing accuracies by reducing parasitic vibrations (Painter, ¶42). Regarding claim 17, it is rejected similarly as claim 7. The apparatus can be found in Khaleghimeybodi (abstract, system). Claim(s) 8 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Khaleghimeybodi et al (US20220201403, hereinafter “Khaleghimeybodi”) in view of Qin et al (US20220335924, hereinafter “Qin”). Regarding claim 8, Khaleghimeybodi fails to explicitly teach wherein the distortion comprises audio feedback. Qin teaches wherein the distortion comprises audio feedback (¶14, Fig. 12, an error microphone for capturing a noise signal in the user’s ears and processed by a feedback filter for noise cancellation). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the feedback filter technique (as taught by Qin) with the audio system (as taught by Khaleghimeybodi). The rationale to do so is to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable and known results such as noise cancellation. Regarding claim 18, it is rejected similarly as claim 8. The apparatus can be found in Khaleghimeybodi (abstract, system). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to PTO-892, Notice of References Cited for a listing of analogous art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QIN ZHU whose telephone number is (571)270-1304. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6AM-4PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached on 571-272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QIN ZHU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701377
ACOUSTIC PROCESSING DEVICE, ACOUSTIC PROCESSING METHOD, ACOUSTIC PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND ACOUSTIC PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701380
Apparatus, Method and Computer Program for Synthesizing a Spatially Extended Sound Source Using Elementary Spatial Sectors
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701361
METHOD FOR DETERMINING ORIENTATION INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688843
Notification Apparatus, Control Program For Notification Apparatus, And Seat System
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684308
CROSSTALK CANCELLATION FOR REVERBERANT ACOUSTIC FIELDS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.0%)
1y 11m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month