Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/923,838

IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICES, IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Examiner
BERHAN, AHMED A
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
936 granted / 1071 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1101
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) [1-2, 9, 11 and 14-16] is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han (US. 2023/0056564) in view of Hannigan (US. PAT. No. 6, 535,617). Reclaim [1] Han discloses an operating method of an image processing device (see fig. 2), the operating method comprising: receiving at least one image group including a plurality of images (see 202 fig. 2 and ¶¶0048-0049, the image may alternatively be an image including other things, for example: an image showing a person, an object or landscapes, and any image whose authenticity is required to be detected can be used as the image); Han doesn’t seem to exactly discloses detecting, from the at least one image group, fixed pattern noise (FPN) information using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT); and correcting FPN of an original image generated by an image sensor based on the FPN information. Nonetheless in the same field of endeavor Hannigan discloses an image processing system as Han (see Hannigan fig. 6). Hanigan further discloses detecting, from the at least one image group, fixed pattern noise (FPN) information using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) (col. 33-334 lines 67 -5, the method takes an FFT of the filtered data. The FFT spectrum is then normalized by the same normalization process as above. Then the fixed pattern noise is removed in the frequency domain in the same way as in the spatial domain [by the virtue of normalized FT spectrum gives an estimation of the fixed pater noise as for example disclosed in col. 33 lines 47-50]); and correcting FPN of an original image generated by an image sensor based on the FPN information (see col. 34 lines 25-29 and col. 33-334 lines 67 -5, the method takes an FFT of the filtered data. The FFT spectrum is then normalized by the same normalization process as above. Then the fixed pattern noise is removed in the frequency domain in the same way as in the spatial domain [by the virtue of removing the fixed pattern noise correction is achieved]). Hence it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have been motivated to modify Han before the effective filling date of the claimed invention by the teachings of Hannigan since this would allow to detect fixed pattern noise using Fast Fourier Trans formation and remove the fixed pattern noise from an image data. Reclaim [2] Han as modified further discloses, wherein the at least one image group comprises two or more image groups captured at different illuminances at regular intervals (see Hannigan, col. 33 lines 13-17Next, the camera is placed at random rotations (i.e. it could be upside down) so that variations in illumination of the subject to location of the light source are averaged out. The frames captured are then summed to create a composite image, [variation in illumination implies different illumination]). Reclaim [9] Han as modified further discloses wherein the correcting the FPN based on the FPN information comprises: generating a virtual image based on the FPN information; and correcting the FPN by subtracting the virtual image from the original image (see Hannigan, col. 33 lines 47-59, . Now, for each frame, the method calculates the dot product of the frame and this normalized filtered composite image. This gives an estimation of the amount of fixed pattern noise similar to the composite image that is contained in a given image frame. The method then subtracts the composite image, multiplied by this dot product. (208) Here's a mathematical description: ci=composite image, normalized id=image data fd=final data fd=id-dot(ci,id)*ci. This final data has substantially less fixed pattern noise [ the virtual image being dot(ci,id)*ci, the original image being, Id (image data)]. Reclaim [11], Han discloses an image processing device (see fig. 3), comprising: an image sensor configured to output image data (see ¶0065, where y.sub.ij is an image outputted by a camera sensor, x.sub.ij is incident light received by the camera sensor, f.sub.ij is a photo-response non-uniformity multiplicative noise factor, η.sub.ij is shot noise, c.sub.ij is dark current noise, and ε.sub.ij is additional random noise. i=1, . . . , m, j=1, . . . n, and m×n is the resolution of the camera sensor); Han doesn’t seem to explicitly discloses an image signal processor configured to group the image data into at least one image group based on illuminance conditions, detect, based on the at least one image group, fixed pattern noise (FPN) information using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and correct the FPN based on the FPN information. Nonetheless in the same field of endeavor Hannigan discloses an image processing system as Han (see Hannigan fig. 6). Hanigan further discloses an image signal processor configured to group the image data into at least one image group based on illuminance conditions (see col. 33, lines 4-8, This implementation begins by collecting a series of images from an image sensor. To begin, a user or an automated process collects a number of frames of video (200+) while the camera's CCD or CMOS sensor receives uniform illumination) , detect, based on the at least one image group, fixed pattern noise (FPN) information using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) (col. 33-334 lines 67 -5, the method takes an FFT of the filtered data. The FFT spectrum is then normalized by the same normalization process as above. Then the fixed pattern noise is removed in the frequency domain in the same way as in the spatial domain [by the virtue of normalized FT spectrum gives an estimation of the fixed pater noise as for example disclosed in col. 33 lines 47-50]), and correct the FPN based on the FPN information (see col. 34 lines 25-29 and col. 33-334 lines 67 -5, the method takes an FFT of the filtered data. The FFT spectrum is then normalized by the same normalization process as above. Then the fixed pattern noise is removed in the frequency domain in the same way as in the spatial domain [by the virtue of removing the fixed pattern noise correction is achieved]). Hence it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have been motivated to modify Han before the effective filling date of the claimed invention by the teachings of Hannigan since this would allow to detect fixed pattern noise using Fast Fourier Trans formation and remove the fixed pattern noise from an image data. Reclaim [14] Han as modified further discloses , further comprising a memory for storing the FPN information, wherein the image signal processor is configured to: generate a virtual image based on the FPN information; and correct the FPN by subtracting the virtual image from an original image generated by the image sensor (see Hannigan, col. 33 lines 47-59, . Now, for each frame, the method calculates the dot product of the frame and this normalized filtered composite image. This gives an estimation of the amount of fixed pattern noise similar to the composite image that is contained in a given image frame. The method then subtracts the composite image, multiplied by this dot product. (208) Here's a mathematical description: ci=composite image, normalized id=image data fd=final data fd=id-dot(ci,id)*ci. This final data has substantially less fixed pattern noise [ the virtual image being dot(ci,id)*ci, the original image being, Id (image data)]) . Reclaim [15] Han as modified further discloses, wherein the memory stores the FPN information to correspond to a number of columns or rows (see Hannigan, 1308, fig. 21 and col. 33 lines 47-52, Now, for each frame, the method calculates the dot product of the frame and this normalized filtered composite image. This gives an estimation of the amount of fixed pattern noise similar to the composite image that is contained in a given image frame. The method then subtracts the composite image, multiplied by this dot product, [performing the dot product implies a matrix arrangement in the buffer a fixed pattern noise is estimated]). . Reclaim [16] Han as modified further discloses, wherein the illuminance condition includes an illuminance of an interval (see Hannigan col. 33 lines 6-8, automated process collects a number of frames of video (200+) while the camera's CCD or CMOS sensor receives uniform illumination [illumination while collecting a number of frames]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims [17-20] are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Reclaim[17] none of the prior arts on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: An image processing system, comprising: generate a plurality of average images corresponding to each of the plurality of image groups, measure an amplitude and phase of each of the plurality of average images using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), detect fixed pattern noise (FPN) information based on the amplitude and phase of each of the plurality of average images, correct FPN based on the FPN information; and a memory configured to store data therein; In conjunction with the other limitation of the claim. Claims [18-20] are allowed due to their direct or indirect dependency on claim [17]. Claims [3-8, 10 and 12-13] objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter Reclaim [3] none of the prior art on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: wherein the detecting the FPN information comprises: generating average images corresponding to the at least one image group based on average values of pixel values of the plurality of images included in each of the at least one image group; and detecting, from the average images, the FPN information using the FFT. Claims [4-7] are allowed due to their direct or indirect dependency on claim [3]. Reclaim [8] none of the prior art on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: . The operating method of claim 1, wherein the FPN information comprises column FPN information and row FPN information, the detecting, from the at least one image group, the FPN information comprises generating a column average image based on average values for column line pixel values of the plurality of images; generating a row average image based on average values of row line pixel values of the plurality of images; and detecting, from the column average image and the row average image, the column FPN information and the row FPN information using the FFT, and the correcting the FPN based on the FPN information comprises correcting the FPN based on the column FPN information and the row FPN information. Reclaim [10] none of the prior arts on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: The operating method of claim 1, wherein the FPN information comprises a period of primary FPN, a start point of the primary FPN, and an LSB slope of the primary FPN, and the detecting the FPN information comprises: measuring an amplitude of the at least one image group using the FFT; detecting a period of the FPN based on the amplitude of the at least one image group; determining, as the period of the primary FPN, a period of the FPN, that is less than or equal to a threshold period, in the period of the FPN; and detecting the start point of the primary FPN and the LSB slope of the primary FPN based on the period of the primary FPN. Reclaim [12] none of the prior arts on the record either singularly or in combination teaches or reasonably suggests: The image processing device of claim 11, wherein the FPN information comprises a period of the FPN, a start point of the FPN, and a least significant bit (LSB) slope of the FPN. Claim [13] is allowed due to its dependency on claim [12]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED A BERHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5094. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00Am-5:00pm (MAX- Flex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED A BERHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604099
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604097
EXPOSURE CONVERGENCE METHOD AND RELATED IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604083
Recommendation Method of Video Recording Mode, Electronic Device, and Readable Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598857
IMAGING DEVICE INCLUDING AN ELECTRODE HAVING A TANTALUM NITRIDE LAYER AND ANOTHER LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598392
EFFICIENT PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA FOR GENERATING COMPOSITE IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month