Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/923,909

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Oct 27, 2023 — JP 2023-184946
Examiner
KIRKLAND III, FREDDIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
976 granted / 1156 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1156 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
FIRST NON-FINAL REJECTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With respect to claim 5, the claim recites a method claim but no method steps are described. The claim recites “wherein the metal member provided on the outside of the object is provided with a unit that allows measurement by electromagnetic induction”, but no positively recited method step of measuring is described. Thereby, as no inspection method is clearly described in combination with the described claimed elements, the claim is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tamura et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication 2020/0158690. With respect to claims 1, 3, and 5, Tamura teaches an ultrasonic sensor attached to a surface of an object (ultrasonic sensor 20 adhered to surface of target 42, figure 1); a sensor coil electrically connected to the ultrasonic sensor (sensor coil 21 connected to sensor 20, paragraph 34); and a transmission and reception coil provided facing the sensor coil via a metal member provided on an outside of the object (reception coil 30 and transmission coil 31 and metallic exterior member 4, paragraphs 34-35, figure 1), wherein the metal member provided on the outside of the object is provided with an opening that has a slit shape (interpreted as penetration hole 5 where the shape is also interpreted as a slit shape, paragraph 36, figure 1) and where the metal member provided on the outside of the object is provided with a unit that allows measurement by electromagnetic induction (penetration hole 5, paragraph 36, figure 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FREDDIE KIRKLAND III whose telephone number is (571)272-2232. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at (571) 272-4107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. FREDDIE KIRKLAND III Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 /Freddie Kirkland III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 8/2/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692798
APPARATUS FOR DIVERTING RADIATION EMITTED FROM SOURCE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687450
FUNCTIONALLY TESTING A LEAK DETECTION DEVICE FOR CHECKING THE SEALING TIGHTNESS OF AN INSPECTION OBJECT FILLED WITH A LIQUID
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685076
PRESSURE PUCK DIAGNOSTIC WAFER
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680894
Optical Soft Skin System for Multimodal Sensing
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673708
GROUND SENSING UTILIZING ACTIVE SOURCES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1156 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month