Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/924,105

BEAD CHAIN OR CORD RETAINER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Mar 26, 2024 — TW 113203022
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
UNI-SOLEIL ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1161 granted / 1779 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1806
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1779 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 13, line 8, and all the dependent claims, the limitation “a through hole mounted to the third wall” is misdescriptive. The through-hole (16) is not “mounted to” the third wall (13). Rather, the third wall has a through-hole formed therein or therethrough. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “a through hole extending through the third wall” to correct the problems. Regarding claims 1 and 13, line 27, and all the dependent claims, the limitation “a part of the passage is overlapped with the first wall and the second wall” is misdescriptive. According to the specification and drawings, a part of the passage (23) is located between the first and second walls. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “a part of the passage is located between the first wall and the second wall” to correct the problems. Also, in the penultimate line, “the passage overlapped with” should be changed to “the passage located between” to fix the misdescriptive problem with the limitations including the term “overlapped”. The specification should also reflect the above corresponding changes to the claims to provide antecedence for the changed language in the specification. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-12 and 14-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. The prior art fail to disclose a bead chain or cord retainer comprising a frame, a moving part, and an elastic member. The frame consists of a first wall, a second wall disposed opposite to the first wall, a third wall connected with a side of the first wall and a side of the second wall, a space defined by the first wall, the second wall, and the third wall and penetrating vertically, a limit rod disposed between the first wall and the second wall and across the space, and a through-hole extending through the third wall. The moving part having a first moving unit, a second moving unit, and a passage; the first moving unit is provided with a first vertical wall, a connection segment connected to a top of the first vertical wall, and an extension segment extending from a bottom of the first vertical wall toward the second moving unit; the second moving unit is a vertical wall arranged opposite to the first vertical wall and a top end of the second moving unit is connected to a side of the connection segment in an assembled manner; the passage is penetrating horizontally, defined by the first vertical wall, the second moving unit, and the connection segment. The passage allows a bead chain or a cord to extend therethrough. The second moving unit is provided with an installation hole. A fastener is inserted through the installation hole and the through hole to fasten the retainer to a building. The first vertical wall and the second moving unit are inserted and mounted in the space of the frame. When the connection segment of the moving part is aligned with the limit rod of the frame, when the moving part is inserted and mounted in the space of the frame, a part of the passage is located between the first wall and the second wall. The elastic member is arranged between the limit rod and the extension segment for allowing the moving part to be elastically mounted in the space. The bead chain or the cord extending through the passage is able to be clipped or released by changing of an area size of the passage overlapped between the first wall and the second wall. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635771
SLIDER FOR SLIDE FASTENER
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630095
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A VEHICLE ACCESSORY MOUNT SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623743
MOTORCYCLE LUGGAGE SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616282
ITEM OF JEWELLERY
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611013
DEVICE COMPRISING DECORATIVE OBJECTS HAVING RESTRAINED FREEDOM TO MOVE AND SUSPENDED IN FLUID
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month