Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/924,571

SLOT ALLOCATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 24, 2022 — CN 202210454858.X +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO G
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 370 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
431
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
74.8%
+34.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 370 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 1-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Claim 1 states “for each first basis of the plurality of first bases, multiplying the corresponding first basis with a corresponding first basis coefficient, each first basis coefficient being used to determine a quantity of slots”, however the multiplying each first basis with a coefficient is not described in the specification. What is described in the specification para [0071] and fig. 6 shows multiplying each first basis type (e.g. b1, b2, b3, b4) with a coefficient. The examiner suggests the claims to state, “for each first basis type of the plurality of first bases, multiplying the corresponding first basis type with a corresponding first basis type coefficient, each first basis type coefficient being used to determine a quantity of slots”. Claim 1 states that “each first basis type in the plurality of first bases indicates a quantity of slots of a corresponding first basis”. However, it is not clear how each first basis type (b1, b2, b3, b4) is indicating a quantity of slots. As seen in fig 4, the count of each first basis type indicates a number of slots. Claims 2-20 are rejected with the same reasoning as claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO G NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-7732. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 10pm - 6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Vu can be reached on 571-272-3155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAO G NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2461 /HUY D VU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764798
Information Indication Method and Apparatus
4y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764610
TECHNIQUES FOR INDICATING RESERVATION OF UNLICENSED BANDS FOR SENSING SIGNALS
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764682
MEASUREMENT PROCESSING METHOD, PARAMETER CONFIGURATION METHOD, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12739649
TECHNIQUES FOR FULL-DUPLEX LISTEN-BEFORE-TALK OPERATIONS IN AN UNLICENSED RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
5y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739214
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PROCESSING CONTROL PLANE DATA
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+4.0%)
3y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 370 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month