Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/924,742

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POWER CONTROL IN A GATEWAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Dec 23, 2021 — continuation of 12/150,049
Examiner
ONAMUTI, GBEMILEKE J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
700 granted / 814 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
822
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 814 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting 2. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 3. Claims 1-27 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-20 of Patent No.: US 12,150,049 B2 to Ong, Ivan. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant claims limitation are transparently found in the claims of the above mentioned patented claims. Applicant’s incorporate underlined limitations to the independent claims of this instant application below so as broaden the patented application. Thus, both set of claims are obvious variant of each other. See table and claim mapping below: Applicant’s merely broadens the independent claims of this instant application by adding some limitations to arrive at the limitations of the instant claims. Thus, both set of claims are obvious variant of each other. See table and claim mapping below: Patent No.: US 12,150,049 B2 Instant Application 18/924,742 Claim 1: A method comprising: determining, by a gateway device comprising a plurality of components, a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; determining one or more active components of the plurality of components; causing, based on the determining the one or more active components, a reduction, for a first time period, of a modulation rate associated with the one or more active components; and causing, based on an expiration of the first time period, backup power to the one or more active components to be removed. Claim 1: A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, cause: determining, by a gateway device comprising a plurality of components, a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; determining one or more active components of the plurality of components; causing, based on the determining the one or more active components, a reduction, for a first time period, of a modulation rate associated with the one or more active components; and causing, based on an expiration of the first time period, backup power to the one or more active components to be removed. The instant application discloses virtually all the limitations of the patented application with the exception of ‘a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions’ executing these claim limitation(s). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the time the invention was filed to provide ‘a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions’ executing these claim limitation(s)’ as disclosed by the instant claim into the patented claim so as to effectively improve and control power system in wireless communication devices. Claim 2: Determining one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and causing, based on the determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 2: Determining one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and causing, based on the determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 3: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 3: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 4: Wherein the determining the disruption of primary power to the gateway device comprises receiving an indication from a backup battery indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 4: Wherein the instructions that, when executed, cause the determining the disruption of primary power to the gateway device, cause receiving an indication from the battery device indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 5: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises causing a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 5: Wherein the instructions that, when executed, cause causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components, cause causing a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 6: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 6: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 7: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises changing from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 7: Wherein the instructions that, when executed, cause causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components, cause changing from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 8: Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 8: Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 9: Causing, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network interface associated with the gateway device. Claim 9: Wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause causing, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network interface associated with the gateway device. Claim 10: A method comprising: receiving, at a gateway device comprising a plurality of components, a wireless signal indicating a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; causing, based on the receiving the indication of the disruption of primary power, a reduction, for a first period of time, of a modulation rate associated with one or more of the plurality of components; and causing, based on determining an expiration of the first period of time, backup power to the one or more of the plurality of components to be removed. Claim 10: A gateway device comprising: a plurality of components; one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the gateway device to: determine a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; determine one or more active components of the plurality of components; cause, based on the determining the one or more active components, a reduction, for a first time period, of a modulation rate associated with the one or more active components; and cause, based on an expiration of the first time period, backup power to the one or more active components to be removed. The instant application discloses virtually all the limitations of the patented application with the exception of ‘a gateway device’ executing these claim limitation(s). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the time the invention was filed to provide ‘a gateway device’ executing these claim limitation(s)’ as disclosed by the instant claim into the patented claim so as to effectively improve and control power system in wireless communication devices. Claim 11: Determining one or more second components of the plurality of components; and causing, based on the receiving the indication of the disruption of primary power, the backup power to the one or more second components to be removed. Claim 11: Determine one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and cause, based on the determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 3: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 12: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 4: Wherein the determining the disruption of primary power to the gateway device comprises receiving an indication from a backup battery indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 13: Determine the disruption of primary power to the gateway device, cause the gateway device to receive an indication from the battery device indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 5: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises causing a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 14: Wherein the instructions that, when executed, cause the gateway device to cause the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components, cause the gateway device to cause a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 6: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 15: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 7: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises changing from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 16: Wherein the instructions that, when executed, cause the gateway device to cause the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components, cause the gateway device to change from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 8: Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 17: Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 9: Causing, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network. Claim 18: Wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the gateway device to cause, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network interface associated with the gateway device. Claim 16: A method comprising: determining, by a gateway device comprising a plurality of components, a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; determining one or more active components of the plurality of components; causing, based on the determining the one or more active components, a reduction, for a first time period, of a modulation rate associated with the one or more active components; determining one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and causing, based on determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 19: A system comprising: a source of primary power; and a gateway device comprising a plurality of components and configured to: determine a disruption of primary power associated with the gateway device; determine one or more active components of the plurality of components; cause, based on the determining the one or more active components, a reduction, for a first time period, of a modulation rate associated with the one or more active components; and cause, based on an expiration of the first time period, backup power to the one or more active components to be removed. The instant application discloses virtually all the limitations of the patented application with the exception of ‘a system’ executing these claim limitation(s). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the time the invention was filed to provide ‘a system’ executing these claim limitation(s)’ as disclosed by the instant claim into the patented claim so as to effectively improve and control power system in wireless communication devices. Claim 2: Determining one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and causing, based on the determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 20: Determine one or more inactive components of the plurality of components; and cause, based on the determining the one or more inactive components, backup power to the one or more inactive components to be removed. Claim 3: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 21: Wherein the backup power is provided by a battery device. Claim 4: Wherein the determining the disruption of primary power to the gateway device comprises receiving an indication from a backup battery indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 22: Wherein the gateway device is configured to determine the disruption of primary power to the gateway device by receiving an indication from the battery device indicating the disruption of primary power. Claim 5: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises causing a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 23: Wherein the gateway device is configured to cause the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components by causing a reduction in a quantity of spatial streams associated with the one or more active components. Claim 6: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 24: Wherein the quantity of spatial streams is associated with at least one of a quantity of transmitting antennas or a quantity of receiving antennas associated with the one or more active components. Claim 7: Wherein causing the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components comprises changing from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 25: Wherein the gateway device is configured to cause the reduction of the modulation rate associated with the one or more active components by changing from a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to a second MCS that is different from the first MCS. Claim 8: Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 26:Wherein the first MCS comprises at least one of 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or 1024-QAM, and wherein the second MCS comprises at least one of binary phase shift keying, quadrature phase shift keying, or 16-QAM. Claim 9: Causing, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network. Claim 27: Wherein the gateway device is further configured to cause, based on the determining the disruption of primary power, backup power to be provided to at least one voice port or wide area network interface associated with the gateway device. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI whose telephone number is (571)270-5619. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASAD NAWAZ can be reached at (571)272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750912
COMMUNICATION METHOD, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND CHIP
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12726905
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION IN MESH ROUTER ACCESS POINT DEVICES
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726959
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR COMMUNICATIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726998
TERMINAL, BASE STATION, RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719625
Time Sharing Among Multiple Wireless Stations During a Single Resource Unit
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-0.2%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 814 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month