Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/925,217

OUTER HANDLE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE DOOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 28, 2023 — JP 2023-185124
Examiner
WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Minebea Accesssolutions Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
106 granted / 193 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 193 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION65 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/21/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The amendments present do not require all light reflective surfaces to covered in the housing and then becoming exposed, instead merely requiring “at least one”. In other words, the claim language does not require every element readable on a “light reflecting surface” present to be covered in the housed position just “at least one”. Claim Objections The claim objections are overcome by the present arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cervone et al. US 20220018168 A1 (hereinafter Cervone) in view of Nolan et al. US 20110121631 A1 (hereinafter Nolan). In regards to claim 1, Cervone teaches an outer handle device for a vehicle door, comprising: an outer handle (16) including an operating portion (40) configured to be manually operated (see fig 5), and being attached to a support case (14) fixed to an outer panel of a door (12a; see fig 2) so as to be movable between a housed position (see fig 5) where an outer surface of the outer handle is substantially flush with an outer surface of the outer panel (see fig 5) and a pop-up position where the operating portion protrudes outward from the outer panel (see fig 8); and an actuator (20) configured to drive the outer handle from the housed position to the pop-up position (para 27), wherein the outer handle is attached to the support case so that the outer handle is fully stroked manually from the pop-up position to a full stroke position further outward (para 37) and at least one surface (a surface within 12a when the handle is retracted that becomes visible when the handle is extended note figs 5-6) wherein a first surface (a surface of the at least one surface above) is provided at least part of a rear surface of an end portion at least on a vehicle rear side among exposed surfaces of the outer handle that are exposed to an outside in the pop-up position (note figs 5-6 and 8), wherein each of the at least one surfaces is completely covered by the outer panel of the door when the outer handle is in the housed position (see figs 2 and 5). However, Cervone does not teach the at least one surface is at least one light reflecting surface. Nolan teaches a similar device where reflective tape may be applied to any part of the locking mechanism. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have Carvones at least one surface be a light reflecting surface in order to aid a user in locating or utilizing the handle (Nolan para 30). In regards to claim 2, Cervone teaches an outer handle device for a vehicle door, comprising: an outer handle (16) including an operating portion (40) configured to be manually operated (see fig 5), and being attached to a support case (14) fixed to an outer panel of a door (12a; see fig 2)) so as to be movable between a housed position (see fig 5) where an outer surface of the outer handle is substantially flush with an outer surface of the outer panel (see fig 5) and a pop-up position where the operating portion protrudes outward from the outer panel (see fig 8); and an actuator (20) configured to drive the outer handle from the housed position to the pop-up position (para 27), wherein the outer handle is attached to the support case so that the outer handle is fully stroked manually from the pop-up position to a full stroke position further outward (para 37) and at least one surface (a surface within 12a when the handle is retracted that becomes visible when the handle is extended note figs 5-6) wherein a first surface (a surface of the at least one surface above) is provided at least part of an upper surface (see figs 2 and 5-6), of the outer handle , that is exposed to an outside in the pop-up position (see fig 6), wherein each of the at least one surfaces is completely covered by the outer panel of the door when the outer handle is in the housed position (see figs 2 and 5). However, Cervone does not teach the at least one surface is at least one light reflecting surface. Nolan teaches a similar device where reflective tape may be applied to any part of the locking mechanism. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have Carvones first surface be a light reflecting surface in order to aid a user in locating or utilizing the handle (Nolan para 30). In regards to claim 3, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 1, wherein, on the upper surface, of the outer handle, that is exposed to the outside in the pop-up position, at least one cover (Cervone 38) configured to cover at least part of the upper surface is detachably attached (Cervone see fig 15), and the at least one light reflecting surface is provided at at least a rear surface of the at least one cover (Nolan teaches applying to any surface and Cervone’s 38 is covered when the handle is retracted). In regards to claim 4, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 2, wherein, on the upper surface, of the outer handle, that is exposed to the outside in the pop-up position, at least one cover (Cervone 38) configured to cover at least part of the upper surface is detachably attached (Cervone see fig 15), and the at least one light reflecting surface is provided at at least a rear surface of the at least one cover (Nolan teaches applying to any surface and Cervone’s 38 is covered when the handle is retracted). In regards to claim 5, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 3, wherein a pivot shaft (Cervone 42) configured to guide and support a pivotal movement of the outer handle (Cervone see figs 5 and 15) is fitted with the outer handle when the outer handle is pivotally operated from the pop-up position to the full stroke position, and one of the at least one cover is provided with an engagement portion (Cervone portion covering the heads of the pins , see fig 17) configured to engage with the pivot shaft to prevent the pivot shaft from coming off the outer handle (Cervone see fig 17 and para 35). In regards to claim 6, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 4, wherein a pivot shaft (Cervone 42) configured to guide and support a pivotal movement of the outer handle (Cervone see figs 5 and 15) is fitted with the outer handle when the outer handle is pivotally operated from the pop-up position to the full stroke position, and one of the at least one cover is provided with an engagement portion (Cervone portion covering the heads of the pins , see fig 17) configured to engage with the pivot shaft to prevent the pivot shaft from coming off the outer handle (Cervone see fig 17 and para 35). In regards to claim 7, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 1. However, Cervone does not teach wherein the outer handle is provided with a lighting device configured to illuminate the at least one light reflecting surface. Nolan teaches a lighting device used to illuminate their locking mechanism to indicate the locked or unlocked position (para 30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have the outer handle is provided with a lighting device configured to illuminate the at least one light reflecting surface in order to indicate the status of the handle (see Nolan para 30). In regards to claim 8, Cervone in view of Nolan teaches the outer handle device for a vehicle door, according to claim 2. However, Cervone does not teach wherein the outer handle is provided with a lighting device configured to illuminate the at least one light reflecting surface. Nolan teaches a lighting device used to illuminate their locking mechanism to indicate the locked or unlocked position (para 30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have the outer handle is provided with a lighting device configured to illuminate the at least one light reflecting surface in order to indicate the status of the handle (see Nolan para 30). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER H WATSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5393. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine M Mills can be reached at (571) 272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER H WATSON/Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
May 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768196
LOCKING DEVICE WITH A CATCH FOR PREVENTING ROTATION OF A LATCH BOLT
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12742343
ELECTRONIC DOOR LOCK
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12704001
VAULT DOOR
5y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703998
DOOR LOCK ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12687047
DOOR LOCKING SYSTEM WITH A RAPID RELEASE MECHANISM
6y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+37.8%)
3y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 193 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month