Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/925,273

COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — CN 202210443631.5 +1 more
Examiner
LOTTER, DAVID E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 599 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
612
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
77.3%
+37.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 599 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1/23/2025, 7/14/2025, 11/21/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ericsson “New Solution to KI of Emergency Services for UE-to-Network Relaying” – of record, hereinafter Ericsson. Regarding claim 1 Ericsson discloses a communication method, wherein the method comprises: determining, by a relay terminal, that a network accessed by the relay terminal supports an emergency service (e.g., “5GC indicates emergency service support indicator…”); and sending, by the relay terminal, a first message useable for a remote terminal discovering the relay terminal, wherein the first message is a first discovery message (e.g., “…announces emergency support…”), and the first discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”); or the first message is a response message responsive to a second discovery message from the remote terminal, and the second discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”). Regarding claim 2 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the determining, by the relay terminal, that the network accessed by the relay terminal supports the emergency service comprises: determining, by the relay terminal, that the relay terminal has received an emergency service support indicator from an access and mobility management function network element or an access network device; wherein the emergency service support indicator indicates that the network accessed by the relay terminal supports the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 3 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: receiving, by the relay terminal, the second discovery message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 4 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: receiving, by the relay terminal, first configuration information from a policy control function network element, wherein the first configuration information comprises the relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 5 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: receiving, by the relay terminal, a seventh message from the remote terminal, wherein the seventh message requests to establish a connection to the relay terminal for transmission of the emergency service; and upon receiving the seventh message, in response to the relay terminal having no emergency protocol data unit (PDU) session for the transmission of the emergency service, requesting, by the relay terminal, to establish an emergency PDU session (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 6 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 5, wherein the seventh message is a direct communication request message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 7 Ericsson discloses a communication apparatus, comprising: a memory, configured to store a computer program; and at least one processor, configured to execute the computer program stored in the memory, to enable the apparatus to: determine that a network accessed by a relay terminal supports an emergency service (e.g., “5GC indicates emergency service support indicator…”); and send a first message useable for a remote terminal discovering the relay terminal (e.g., “…announces emergency support…”), wherein the first message is a first discovery message, and the first discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”); or the first message is a response message responsive to a second discovery message from the remote terminal, and the second discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”). Regarding claim 8 Ericsson further discloses the apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to enable the apparatus to: determine that the relay terminal has received an emergency service support indicator from an access and mobility management function network element or an access network device; wherein the emergency service support indicator indicates that the network accessed by the relay terminal supports the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 9 Ericsson further discloses the apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to enable the apparatus to receive the second discovery message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 10 Ericsson further discloses the apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to enable the apparatus to: receive first configuration information from a policy control function network element, wherein the first configuration information comprises the relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 11 Ericsson further discloses the apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to enable the apparatus to: receive a seventh message from the remote terminal, wherein the seventh message requests to establish a connection to the relay terminal for transmission of the emergency service; and upon receiving the seventh message, in response to the relay terminal having no emergency protocol data unit (PDU) session for the transmission of the emergency service, request to establish an emergency PDU session (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 12 Ericsson further discloses the apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the seventh message is a direct communication request message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 13 Ericsson discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, wherein the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program executable on at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform: determining that a network accessed by a relay terminal supports an emergency service (e.g., “5GC indicates emergency service support indicator…”); and sending a first message useable for a remote terminal discovering the relay terminal, wherein the first message is a first discovery message (e.g., “…announces emergency support…”), and the first discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”); or the first message is a response message responsive to a second discovery message from the remote terminal, and the second discovery message comprises a relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., “announces only support of emergency service…”). Regarding claim 14 Ericsson further discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 13, wherein the computer program is executable on the at least one processor to further enable the at least one processor to perform: determining that the relay terminal has received an emergency service support indicator from an access and mobility management function network element or an access network device; wherein the emergency service support indicator indicates that the network accessed by the relay terminal supports the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 15 Ericsson further discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 13, wherein the computer program is executable on the at least one processor to further enable the at least one processor to perform: receiving the second discovery message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 16 Ericsson further discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 13, wherein the computer program is executable on the at least one processor to further enable the at least one processor to perform: receiving first configuration information from a policy control function network element, wherein the first configuration information comprises the relay service code corresponding to the emergency service (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 17 Ericsson further discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 13, wherein the computer program is executable on the at least one processor to further enable the at least one processor to perform: receiving a seventh message from the remote terminal, wherein the seventh message requests to establish a connection to the relay terminal for transmission of the emergency service; and upon receiving the seventh message, in response to the relay terminal having no emergency protocol data unit (PDU) session for the transmission of the emergency service, requesting to establish an emergency PDU session (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 18 Ericsson further discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 17, wherein the seventh message is a direct communication request message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 19 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the first message comprises at least one of an emergency registration indicator or emergency registration time information for the remote terminal to perform relay selection (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Regarding claim 20 Ericsson further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the first message is the response message responsive to the second discovery message from the remote terminal, and the sending, by the relay terminal, the first message comprises: in response to the relay service code in the second discovery message matching a relay service code stored in the relay terminal, sending the first message (e.g., see 5GC indicates emergency service support indicator in registration acceptance to UE; see also “5G Prs Se UE-to-Network Relay needs to handle emergency access request from a remote UE”). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The Applicant’s disclosure of multiple International Search Reports (ISRs) contain additional references and analysis considered highly relevant to the current application. The Examiner suggests examining these references and distinguishing the current claims from the cited prior art. The Examiner suggests an interview if it will help advance prosecution of this application. The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the entire reference aspotentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of thepassage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E LOTTER whose telephone number is (571)270-7422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at 571-272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID E. LOTTER Primary Examiner Art Unit 2845 /DAVID E LOTTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684537
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC BASE STATION UPLINK/DOWNLINK FUNCTIONAL SPLIT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676428
APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM OF A POLARIZED ANTENNA
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665291
SMART SENSOR DEVICE AND ANTENNA STRUCTURE FOR USE THEREWITH
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658564
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658595
PASSIVE METASURFACE FOR INTERACTING WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNALS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 599 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month