Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/925,274

AUTOMATIC ACTIVE NOISE REDUCTION (ANR) CONTROL TO IMPROVE USER INTERACTION

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Jun 12, 2019 — continuation of 10/681,453 +3 more
Examiner
PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bose Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
566 granted / 678 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections 35 USC § 112 has been withdrawn. Claim Objections has been withdrawn. Claims 6-9, 12, and 17-18 are amended. Claims 1-20 are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Application #18/925,274 Claim 1: A method of controlling a wearable audio device having active noise reduction (ANR) capabilities, the method comprising: detecting a speech signal from a user wearing the wearable audio device, wherein the ANR is set to a first level; in response to detecting the speech signal, determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person; and in response to determining that the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person, automatically setting the ANR to a second level that allows the user to hear sounds external to the wearable audio device more audibly relative to the first level. Patent #12,149,881 Claim 1: A method of controlling a wearable audio device having active noise reduction (ANR) capabilities, the method comprising: detecting a speech signal from a user wearing the wearable audio device, wherein the ANR is set to a first level; in response to detecting the speech signal, determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person; and in response to determining that the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person, automatically setting the ANR to a second level that allows the user to hear sounds external to the wearable audio device more audibly relative to the first level, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is not provided during a call that is unmuted. Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include a wake-up word (WUW) configured to trigger a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 3: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include voice commands for a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 4: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is provided during a call that is muted. Claim 5: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include singing or humming while music is being played by the wearable audio device. Claim 11: The method of claim 1, wherein the second level of the ANR is an aware state. Claim 3: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include a wake-up word (WUW) configured to trigger a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 4: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include voice commands for a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 5: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is provided during a call that is muted. Claim 6: The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include singing or humming while music is being played by the wearable audio device. Claim 10: The method of claim 1, wherein the second level of the ANR is an aware state. Claim 12: A wearable audio device having active noise reduction (ANR) capabilities, the wearable audio device comprising: at least one microphone; and at least one processor configured to: detect a speech signal from a user wearing the wearable audio device, wherein the ANR is set to a first level; in response to detecting the speech signal, determine whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person; and in response to determining that the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person, automatically set the ANR to a second level that allows the user to hear sounds external to the wearable audio device more audibly relative to the first level. Claim 13: The wearable audio device of claim 12, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include a wake-up word (WUW) configured to trigger a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 14: The wearable audio device of claim 12, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include voice commands for a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 15: The wearable audio device of claim 12, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is provided during a call that is muted. Claim 16: The wearable audio device of claim 12, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include singing or humming while music is being played by the wearable audio device. Claim 20: The wearable audio device of claim 12, wherein the second level of the ANR is an aware state. Claim 11: A wearable audio device having active noise reduction (ANR) capabilities, the wearable audio device comprising: at least one microphone; and at least one processor configured to detect a speech signal from a user wearing the wearable audio device, the speech signal detected using the at least one microphone, wherein the ANR is set to a first level; in response to detecting the speech signal, determine whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person; and in response to determining that the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person, automatically set the ANR to a second level that allows the user to hear sounds external to the wearable audio device more audibly relative to the first level, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is not provided during a call that is unmuted. Claim 13: The wearable audio device of claim 11, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include a wake-up word (WUW) configured to trigger a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 14: The wearable audio device of claim 11, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include voice commands for a voice personal assistant (VPA). Claim 15: The wearable audio device of claim 11, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal is provided during a call that is muted. Claim 16: The wearable audio device of claim 11, wherein determining whether the speech signal is not related to a purpose other than to speak with another person includes determining that the speech signal does not include singing or humming while music is being played by the wearable audio device. Claim 20: The wearable audio device of claim 11, wherein the second level of the ANR is an aware state. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 08/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant's arguments failed to address the non-statutory double patenting rejection in the Applicant’s Remarks. Applicants are advised to file a terminal disclaimer for these claims to be made allowable. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOGESHKUMAR G PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-3957. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM-4 PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at (571) 272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YOGESHKUMAR PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Jul 30, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741594
VEHICLE BODY PANELS FOR SPEAKERS, SPEAKER ASSEMBLIES WITH VEHICLE BODY PANELS, AND INSTALLATION METHODS THEREFORE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743247
ACOUSTIC DEVICE, PROGRAM, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739592
Visual Platforms for Configuring Audio Processing Operations
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737354
LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-BASED COMMUNICATION CONTENT GENERATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737542
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR OBTAINING AT LEAST ONE NUMBER
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month