Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/925,306

COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2022 — CN 202210468689.5 +1 more
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, HARUN UR R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
460 granted / 604 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
647
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 604 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority 2. Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uesaka et al (US 20230060444 A1, hereinafter referred to as Uesaka) in view of Taherzadeh Boroujeni et al (US 20220046726, hereinafter referred to as Taherzadeh). Re claim 1, Uesaka teaches a communication method (Fig. 4-7, Fig. 15-16), comprising: (i) receiving, by a terminal device (UE), first information (scheduling information for receiving a system information message (i.e. SIB1)) in a first frequency unit (time frequency resource over which the system information message (i.e. SIB1) scheduling information is received), wherein the first information indicates a first periodicity (SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) in which common information is transmitted (SIB1 scheduling bitmap indicates the SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) (Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, Fig. 15-16, Par 0062-0064, Par 0071-0073, Par 0081-0082, Par 0091, Par 0127-0135, Par 0070-0071, Par 0221-0224); and (ii) detecting, by the terminal device, the common information (receiving SIB1) in a second frequency unit (time frequency resource over which SIB1 is transmitted) based on the first periodicity (SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) (Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, Fig. 15-16, Par 0062-0064, Par 0071, Par 0081-0082, Par 0155, Par 0166-0171, Par 0229-0234), Uesaka teaches to obtain Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) resource information from SIB1 to perform a random access procedure for Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection release with redirection and RRC re-establishment (Par 0004). Uesaka does not explicitly disclose that the common information (i.e.,SIB1) is used by the terminal device for initial access to a network device. Taherzadeh teaches that the common information (SIB1 including PRACH resources) is used by the terminal device for initial access to a network device (initial access procedure (e.g., a RACH procedure)) (Par 0112). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Uesaka by including the step that the common information is used by the terminal device for initial access to a network device, as taught by Taherzadeh for the purpose of providing a beam-specific coverage enhancement to improve signal coverage during a random access procedure, as taught by Taherzadeh (Par 0002-0003). Claim 11 recites a wireless apparatus performing the steps recited in claim 1 and thereby, is rejected for the reasons discussed above with respect to claim 1. Uesaka further teaches that the wireless apparatus comprises one or more processors (Fig. 10, Par 0196, Par 0199). Re claims 2, 8, 12, Uesaka teaches that a duration of the first periodicity is greater than 20 ms (SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) (Fig. 4-7, Par 0110-0111, Par 0114, Par 0133-0134, Par 0150). Re claims 3, 13, Uesaka teaches that the first information further indicates a time window corresponding to the first periodicity (SI window, Fig. 5, transmission occasion within the transmission periodicity, bitmap indicating the transmission occasions with bit value “1” within the transmission periodicity, Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, time TSI to acquire system information within the transmission periodicity, Par 0074, Par 0150) and the detecting the common information in the second frequency unit based on the first periodicity comprises: detecting the common information in the second frequency unit based on the first periodicity in the time window corresponding to the first periodicity (detecting system information/SIB1 based on the transmission occasions/SI window within the transmission periodicity) (Par 0071-0074, Par 0097, Par 0110-0111, Par 0132-0138, Par 0150-0153, Par 0166-0171). Re claims 4, 14, Uesaka teaches that the first information further indicates an identifier of the second frequency unit (carrier identifier k; cell (i.e., cell2) for which SI scheduling information is sent), and the detecting the common information in the second frequency unit based on the first periodicity comprises: detecting the common information in the second frequency unit based on the identifier of the second frequency unit (Carrier k) and the first periodicity (transmission periodicity 160 ms) (Fig. 4-7, Par 0115-0123, Par 0127-0130, Par 0132-0133, Par 0149-0150, Par 0155, Par 0156-0167, Par 0223-0225, Par 0229-0230, Par 0237-0238). Re claims 5, 10, 15, Uesaka teaches that the first information further indicates a second periodicity (20 ms) in which the common information is transmitted (Eight 20 ms transmission occasions within the 160ms transmission periodicity) (Fig. 4-7, Par 0110-0111, Par 0114, Par 0121, Par 0133-0134, Par 0150). Re claims 6, 16, Uesaka teaches to detect the common information in the second frequency unit based on the second periodicity (20 ms transmission occasion) in response to the common information not being detected based on the first periodicity (obtaining SIB1 message in every 20 ms transmission occasion within the transmission periodicity 160 ms, Par 0139, Par 0172) (Par 0133-0134, Par 0139, Par 0172). Re claim 7, Uesaka teaches a communication method (Fig. 4-7, Fig. 15-16), comprising: (i) sending, by a network device (network node, Fig. 8, Par 0177), first information (scheduling information for receiving a system information message (i.e. SIB1)) in a first frequency unit (time frequency resource over which the system information message (i.e. SIB1) scheduling information is sent), wherein the first information indicates a first periodicity (SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) in which common information is transmitted (SIB1 scheduling bitmap indicates the SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) (Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, Fig. 15-16, Par 0062-0064, Par 0071-0073, Par 0081-0082, Par 0091, Par 0127-0135, Par 0070-0071, Par 0221-0224); and (ii) sending, by the network device (network node, Fig. 8, Par 0177), the common information (sending SIB1) in a second frequency unit (time frequency resource over which SIB1 is transmitted) based on the first periodicity (SIB1 transmission periodicity, 160ms) (Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, Fig. 15-16, Par 0062-0064, Par 0071, Par 0081-0082, Par 0155, Par 0166-0171, Par 0229-0234), Uesaka teaches to obtain Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) resource information from SIB1 to perform a random access procedure for Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection release with redirection and RRC re-establishment (Par 0004). Uesaka does not explicitly disclose that the common information (i.e.,SIB1) is used by a terminal device for initial access to a network device. Taherzadeh teaches that the common information (SIB1 including PRACH resources) is used by a terminal device for initial access to a network device (initial access procedure (e.g., a RACH procedure)) (Par 0112). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Uesaka by including the step that the common information is used by a terminal device for initial access to a network device, as taught by Taherzadeh for the purpose of providing a beam-specific coverage enhancement to improve signal coverage during a random access procedure, as taught by Taherzadeh (Par 0002-0003). Re claim 9, Uesaka teaches that the first information further indicates at least one of : a time window corresponding to the first periodicity (SI window, Fig. 5, transmission occasion within the transmission periodicity, bitmap indicating the transmission occasions with bit value “1” within the transmission periodicity, Fig. 4, Fig. 6-7, time TSI to acquire system information within the transmission periodicity, Par 0074, Par 0150) or an identifier of the second frequency unit. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARUN UR R CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-3895. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang B Yao can be reached at 5712723182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARUN CHOWDHURY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739072
PHASE TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNALS AND DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR JOINT CHANNEL ESTIMATION
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732862
DATA PACKET DECOMPRESSION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND NETWORK SIDE DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732935
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BROADCASTING PUBLIC INFORMATION, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12719612
MACHINE LEARNING ASSISTED PREDICTIVE RETRANSMISSION FEEDBACK
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707452
DYNAMIC LINK MANAGEMENT IN MULTI-LINK OPERATION FOR MESH NETWORK
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 604 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month