Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/925,325

Atmospheric Corrosion Sensor

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 25, 2023 — EU 23205879.2
Examiner
MEGNA FUENTES, ANTHONY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ABB Schweiz AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
423 granted / 520 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
531
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 520 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 10/24/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Glass et al. (US 5,306,414; cited in the IDS filed on 10/24/2024). Regarding claim 1, Glass teaches an atmospheric corrosion sensor (Abstract; Figures 1-3; Column 5, Lines 5-40) for detecting corrosion of electrical equipment (15 and 16; Figures 1-3; Column 5, Lines 5-40), comprising: at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16; Figures 1-3) placed on at least one insulated corrosion sensor substrate (9; Figures 1 and 3; Column 6, Lines 35-39 and Column 7, Lines 21-35); wherein the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) are accessible to corrosion atmosphere (surrounding environment; Abstract; Column 5, Line 6 – Column 6, Line 5); wherein the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) have the same spatial dimensions (See Figures 1 and 3; Column 6, Lines 15-34); and wherein each of the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16; Column 5, Lines 20-24) comprises a different composition of corrodible material (Structure 15 is aluminum 2024 and structure 16 is aluminum 7075; it is known in the art that aluminum 2024 and aluminum 7075 have different compositions of corrodible material since they both contain at least aluminum, copper, magnesium and zinc with different concentrations of each said element; Column 5, Lines 20-24). PNG media_image1.png 818 1151 media_image1.png Greyscale **Note**: the table above is not from prior art Glass et al. (US 5,306,414) but evidence of material composition comparison between aluminum 2024 and 7075. Regarding claim 1, the Examiner notes that the limitations, “for detecting corrosion of electrical equipment” is an intended use type limitation. A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. In this case, the corrosion sensor of Glass is capable of detecting corrosion of electrical equipment that uses aluminum 2024 and/or aluminum 7074. See In re Casey, 152 USPQ 235 (CCPA 1967) and In re Otto, 136 USPQ 458, 459 (CCPA 1963). See MPEP 2114. Regarding claim 2, Glass teaches wherein the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) comprise a different concentration of a same chemical composition of corrodible material (per the evidence of the table presented above, the concentration of materials copper, magnesium and/or zinc for both aluminum 2024 and aluminum 7075 are different). Regarding claim 3, Glass teaches wherein each of the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) comprises a different chemical composition of corrodible material (per the evidence of the table presented above, the concentration of materials copper, magnesium and/or zinc for both aluminum 2024 and aluminum 7075 are different; therefore, the chemical compositions of both aluminum 2024 and aluminum 7075 are different). Regarding claim 4, Glass teaches wherein the corrodible material is corrodible a metal alloy selected from the group consisting of copper, aluminum, iron, zinc, nickel, silver, tin, steel, and brass (both aluminum 2024 and 7075 contain elements/materials aluminum, copper, iron and zinc; See the table above). Regarding claim 5, Glass teaches wherein each of the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) is constructed as a film (See Figures 1 and 3; Column 6, Lines 15-34). Regarding claim 6, Glass teaches wherein each of the at least two atmospheric corrosion sensing structures (15 and 16) is connected in series to a resistive component (pads 40 and/or leads 48 have an internal resistance, i.e. resistive components; Column 6, Lines 40-47; Column 7, Lines 21-35). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY W MEGNA FUENTES whose telephone number is (571)272-6456. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura Martin can be reached at 571-272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY W MEGNA FUENTES/Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /LAURA MARTIN SWEENEY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730044
HIGH-WATER PRESSURE TRAPDOOR MODEL TEST DEVICE AND USE METHOD THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730061
VIBRATION DAMPED SENSOR DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723963
METHOD FOR EVALUATING ON-SITE DESORPTION EFFECT OF ACTIVATED COKE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698869
In-Pipe Localization of Tools Using Signal Profiles
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687532
GALVANICALLY ISOLATED GAS SENSING SYSTEM FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.6%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 520 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month