Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/925,426

BOWTIE CLIP

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
1156 granted / 1771 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1771 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 12-20 define the limitation “a U-shaped void” to describe a notch or channel (104) between the first and second clips. As can be see, the void (104) is merely an open space defined by the sidewalls and bottom wall between the two clips and front portion. It is misdescriptive to claim that the void is U-shaped. It is suggested to redefine the limitation in the claims and throughout the specification as a channel or notched located between the clips to correct the problem. PNG media_image1.png 288 788 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 12 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Strauss, US 2035847. Regarding claims 1 and 12, Strauss discloses a clip having a front portion with a flat surface (17). A first and second clips (14, located on the right and left sides of a center void) having first (15) and second (16) gripping elements affixed to the front surface. PNG media_image2.png 235 416 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claims 2-3 and 14-15, Strauss discloses the second gripping elements being longer than the first gripping elements and the first gripping elements located closer to the front portion than the second gripping elements. PNG media_image3.png 230 672 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claims 4 and 16, Strauss discloses forming a gripping region in approximate midpoint of the corresponding second gripping elements, i.e., the midpoint between the sides of the second gripping elements and also the approximate midpoint between the ends. PNG media_image4.png 208 431 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claims 5 ad 17, Strauss discloses a gap between the ends of the first and second gripping elements. PNG media_image3.png 230 672 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-11 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strauss, US 2035847 in view of . These claims are directed to the specific type of plastic material used to form the clip. Strauss fails to disclose the material used to make the clip. However, Case discloses the benefits of making a clip from a plastic material as compared to a metal material, i.e., reduce wear on the collar, cheaper to manufacture, and will not rust and stain the collar (column 1, lines 19-30). Furthermore, the examiner takes official notice of the fact that the specific plastics claimed, i.e., polyamide, polycarbonate, polyurethane, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, are all old and well-known plastics used in the clip making industry. Therefore, it would have been obvious prior to the earliest effective filing date, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to make Strauss’s clip from one of these specific plastic materials to reduce wear on the collar, reduce the cost of manufacture and prevent the staining of the collar. Regarding claim 13, Strauss discloses that the void at element 18 is just smaller than a finger’s width, which is about 10mm, +-2-3mm. Depending on the size of the tie and knot desired, it would have been obvious, prior to the earliest filing date, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to vary the width of the void to accommodate the desired size of the knot in order to adequately support the tie with the clip on the collar of the wearer’s shirt, i.e., if the void is too small, the knot will not hang correctly on the clip and if the void is too big, the front portion of the clip will be seen from the front of the knot, which is not desirable. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599202
BAND AND TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599188
HOOK-CLASP STRUCTURE AND UNDERWEAR BACK CLASP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595817
FASTENER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588740
Adjustable Bracelet
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584710
ADJUSTABLE,INTERCHANGEABLE HOLSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1771 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month