Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/925,685

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Mar 29, 2021 — JP 2021-056081 +3 more
Examiner
DUDEK, JAMES A
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1128 granted / 1372 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1389
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1372 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20210132427 A1 (Tai; Ming-Jou et al.) PNG media_image1.png 756 530 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 666 498 media_image2.png Greyscale Per claims 1, 9, and 17-18, Tai teaches a display device [1] comprising: a pixel including a transistor [GE1,DE1,SE1], a pixel electrode [PE1], and a common electrode [CL4]; a semiconductor layer included in the transistor and electrically connected to the pixel electrode [CHL]; an insulating layer formed between the semiconductor layer and the pixel electrode [PL], and having a contact hole [TH1], wherein a part of the pixel electrode is located in the contact hole [see figure 4]; and a spacer filling the contact hole and protruding toward an opposite side of the transistor from the contact hole [SP1], wherein a part of the common electrode overlaps the spacer and the pixel electrode [see figure 4]. Per claims 2 and 10, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, further comprising: a first conductive layer electrically connecting the semiconductor layer and the pixel electrode [DE1], wherein the insulating layer is located on the first conductive layer [see figure 1], and the contact hole exposes the first conductive layer [see figure 4]. Per claims 3 and 11, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 2, further comprising: a second conductive layer between the insulating layer and the pixel electrode, wherein the second conductive layer overlaps the pixel electrode and the common electrode [CL3, see figure 4]. Per claims 4 and 12, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein the part of the common electrode is located between the spacer and the pixel electrode [see figure 4]. Per claims 5 and 13, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, further comprising: a signal line electrically connected to the semiconductor layer [DL1], wherein the first conductive layer is in physical contact with the semiconductor layer at a first portion [see figure 1 and 4], the signal line overlaps the semiconductor layer at a second portion [see figure 1], and the spacer overlaps neither the first portion nor the second portion [see figures 1 and 4]. Per claims 6 and 14, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein a top surface of the spacer is farther from the semiconductor layer than a surface of the common electrode is [see figure 4]. Per claims 7, 15, and 20, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein a distance between a top surface of the spacer and the semiconductor layer is longer than a distance between a surface of the common electrode and the semiconductor layer [see figure 4]. Per claims 8 and 16, Tai teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor layer is formed of an oxide semiconductor [see paragraph 0025: “the material of the semiconductor layer CHL may include amorphous silicon, polysilicon, or metal oxide, but is not limited thereto.”] Per claim 19. Tai teaches the display device according to claim 18, wherein the contact hole is filled with the pixel electrode and the common electrode [see figure 4]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A DUDEK whose telephone number is (571)272-2290. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:30-4:30 MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A DUDEK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769034
PLASTIC LENS FOR SPECTACLES
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769100
ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761495
ALL-OPTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIPLE OPTICAL TRANSFORMATIONS THROUGH A POLARIZATION-ENCODED DIFFRACTIVE NETWORK
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754402
LENS APPARATUS AND RELATED ASSEMBLIES AND VEHICLES FOR LASER IMAGING SYSTEMS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749864
Cooling For Galvo Mirrors In Laser Material Processing
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month