Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/927,153

APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PLASMA ASSISTED COMBUSTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Examiner
MOUBRY, JAMES G
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
VIELETECH INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
668 granted / 844 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
859
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 844 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the Response to Restriction Requirement filed December 22, 2025. As directed by the election: Claims 10-16 are elected for prosecution on the merits WITHOUT TRAVERSE and Claims 1-9 and 17-20 are withdrawn from consideration by Examiner. Drawings New corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in this application because Figures 1 and 3-6 are informal and contain inconsistent line thickness, gaps in the lines, freehand curves, uneven geometry, and potentially illegible reference numbers upon publication. Namely, Figure 6 contains a scribbled-out reference number. Applicant is advised to employ the services of a competent patent draftsperson outside the Office, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office no longer prepares new drawings. The corrected drawings are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The requirement for corrected drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: “303” (see page 7, line 34) and “600” (see page 8, line 21). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “highly reactive gas mixture” in Claims 12-16 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “highly” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10-16 are allowable over the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Specifically, various references are cited that provide detail of relevant methods for introducing fuel to the combustion chamber of an engine. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES G MOUBRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5658. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM - 6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M. Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT MOUBRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601307
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A FUEL TANK VALVE STATE IN A FUEL CELL ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601308
COMBUSTION DEVICE FOR AN ENGINE AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING A PISTON
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601305
Fuel Supply System for Supplying a Fuel Emulsion to a Fuel Injection System of an Engine
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601320
METHOD FOR MANAGING A STALL PHASE OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE ASSOCIATED WITH AN ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601552
RELATING TO RADIATOR GUARDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 844 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month