Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/927,185

PLUMBING CONTROL DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Priority
Jul 31, 2017 — provisional 62/539,155 +3 more
Examiner
DEROSE, VOLVICK
Art Unit
2176
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Watts Regulator Co.
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
576 granted / 640 resolved
+35.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
654
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 640 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 22-25, and 27-41 are presented for examination Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-11, filed August 26, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 27, and 31 under U.S.C. 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of previously cited prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – ((a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 22-23, 25, and 27-41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Meyer (US Patent Application 20140343734). As per claim 22, Meyer teaches a plumbing control device ("PCD") [12, fig. 1 and 2] for controlling a fluid passing therethrough, the PCD comprising [0060, for example, control valve 12 that controls the flow of a substance from the intake 14 to the outtake 16]: a body including an adjustment feature [20, fig. 2] for modifying a performance characteristic of the fluid while the PCD is in active use [0060, for example, actuator assembly 20 controls valve 12 to be either in an open or closed position]. a sensor [30/50, fig. 2] coupled to fluid for generating a first signal indicative of the performance characteristic [0060, for example, sensors 30 can be positioned in places that leaks could be expected to occur and interface with control unit 40 to provide status. If a sensor 30 detects a leak in the substance, then a leak status can be communicated to the control unit 40 and the control unit 40 can send a signal to actuator assembly 20 to turn off the valve 12]. a microcontroller [42, fig. 2] linked to the sensor for controlling operation of the sensor and processing the first signal [0088-0090, the processing element 42 connect to the sensor where the processing element send high signal or low signal to control the valves. For example, to close valve 12 the processing element 42 places a logical high signal onto the Close input that causes transistor T6 to conduct and force the gate of transistor T4 to a logic low level]. a power source [43, fig. 2]. an electrical switch [52, fig. 4A] connecting to the power source to the microcontroller and the sensor, wherein the electrical switch is configured to have: a normally off position in which no power from the power source is drawn by the adjustment feature or microcontroller to conserve energy; and an on position that supplies power from the power source to the microcontroller and the sensor [o141, 0188, 0228, as pointed out from the switch the device can be powered on/off where it is controlled by the processing unit where the processing unit in low power mode when the device is not in used. For example, mechanical switch 52 can provide functions such as power on or off test, or rest functions]. an antenna board [31/26, fig. 2] linked to the microcontroller and, when the switch is in the on position, configured to send a second signal to a mobile device based on the first signal, wherein the mobile device is configured to generate an output display for a user based on the second signal in real-time to allow evaluating the performance characteristic such that the user can adjust the adjustment feature for a desired value of the performance characteristic [0062, 0072, 0222 as shown in figure 2 antenna with receiver connected to the processing unit where signal can be send/receive to the mobile device to control the valve by turning it off. For example, the remote access may be performed in various ways including but not limited to: a PC, Smart Phone or Tablet via the internet; in a Wi-Fi application mode; or the system may also be run manually from the control panel as well. The system has the versatility of allowing operation, bypassing, or restoring to normal operation via the manual buttons on the control panel to control unit 240]. As per claim 27, Meyer teaches a plumbing control device ("PCD") [12, fig. 1-2] for controlling a fluid passing therethrough, the PCD comprising [0060, for example, control valve 12 that controls the flow of a substance from the intake 14 to the outtake 16]: a body including an adjustment feature [20, fig. 2] for modifying a performance characteristic of the fluid while the PCD is in active use [0060, for example, actuator assembly 20 controls valve 12 to be either in an open or closed position]. a sensor [30/50, fig. 2] coupled to the body and configured to generate a first signal indicative of the performance characteristic, wherein the sensor is normally in an off position to conserve energy [0060, 0139, for example, sensors 30 can be positioned in places that leaks could be expected to occur and interface with control unit 40 to provide status. If a sensor 30 detects a leak in the substance, then a leak status can be communicated to the control unit 40 and the control unit 40 can send a signal to actuator assembly 20 to turn off the valve 12. As well as the sensor is in sleep mode to conserve power. For example, an embodiment can provide the sensors 30 with a sleep mode that can be employed to conserve power and be awake during predetermined intervals]. a microcontroller [42, fig. 2] and antenna board assembly [31/26, fig. 2] linked to the sensor for controlling operation of the sensor [0088-0090, the processing element 42 connect to the sensor where the processing element send high signal or low signal to control the valves. For example, to close valve 12 the processing element 42 places a logical high signal onto the Close input that causes transistor T6 to conduct and force the gate of transistor T4 to a logic low level]. a power source [43, fig. 2]. a switch [52, fig. 4A] selectively connecting the power source to the microcontroller and the sensor, wherein the switch is configured to only connect the power source to the microcontroller and the sensor when an activation device is placed co-located within a predetermined range of the switch [0068, 0137, as pointed out the device can be operating within certain range, where outside the range it is not activated. For example, unique identification between sensors 30 and control units 40 allows for multiple systems 10 to be placed within radio frequency range of each other and not have the various components of one system 10 communicate with a component of another system 10]. As per claim 31, Meyer teaches a plumbing control device ("PCD") [12, fig. 1-2] for controlling a fluid passing therethrough, the PCD comprising [0060, for example, control valve 12 that controls the flow of a substance from the intake 14 to the outtake 16]: a portable controller [240, fig. 11]. a body forming a passage [intake 14, outtake 16, via valve 12, fig. 2] for the fluid and including an adjustment feature for modifying at least one performance characteristic of the fluid while the PCD is in active use [0060, for example, actuator assembly 20 controls valve 12 to be either in an open or closed position]. at least one sensor [30/50, fig. 2] coupled to the body and configured to generate at least one signal indicative of the at least one performance characteristic, wherein: the at least one sensor is normally in an off position to conserve energy [0060, 0139, for example, sensors 30 can be positioned in places that leaks could be expected to occur and interface with control unit 40 to provide status. If a sensor 30 detects a leak in the substance, then a leak status can be communicated to the control unit 40 and the control unit 40 can send a signal to actuator assembly 20 to turn off the valve 12. As well as the sensor is in sleep mode to conserve power. For example, an embodiment can provide the sensors 30 with a sleep mode that can be employed to conserve power and be awake during predetermined intervals]. when the at least one sensor is in an on position, the at least one sensor communicates directly with the portable controller to transfer the at least one signal for processing, storage, and display by the portable controller [0223, fig. 11, as pointed out, user with mobile phones can access and control the device. For example, a user may access the system via the internet using a remote device such as smart phones, laptop computers, computers, tablet computers or any virtually any device with a display and internet connection. This allows a user to view problems (both faults and non-faults) remotely and act on those problems using only the internet access. Wireless flowmeters 131 may have their instantaneous and their accumulated amounts viewed. Wireless valves 127 may be opened or closed through the internet connection]. As per claim 23, Meyer teaches the switch is only set to the on position automatically and only when the antenna board comes in a range of the microcontroller [ 0123, 137 censor operates withing certain range]. As per claim 25, Meyer teaches the antenna board is configured to active the switch between the off position and the on position [0062, 0072, 0222 as shown in figure 2 antenna with receiver connected to the processing unit where signal can be send/receive to the mobile device to control the valve by turning it off. For example, the remote access may be performed in various ways including but not limited to: a PC, Smart Phone or Tablet via the internet; in a Wi-Fi application mode; or the system may also be run manually from the control panel as well. The system has the versatility of allowing operation, bypassing, or restoring to normal operation via the manual buttons on the control panel to control unit 240]. As per claim 28, Meyer teaches when the switch is in the on position, the microcontroller and antenna board assembly send a second signal in real-time to allow evaluating the performance characteristic to set the adjustment feature for a desired value of the performance characteristic [0062, 0072, 0222 as shown in figure 2 antenna with receiver connected to the processing unit where signal can be send/receive to the mobile device to control the valve by turning it off. For example, the remote access may be performed in various ways including but not limited to: a PC, Smart Phone or Tablet via the internet; in a Wi-Fi application mode; or the system may also be run manually from the control panel as well. The system has the versatility of allowing operation, bypassing, or restoring to normal operation via the manual buttons on the control panel to control unit 240]. As per claim 29, Meyer teaches the performance characteristic is selected from the group consisting of pressure, temperature and combinations thereof [0100, water pressure of the valve]. As per claim 30, Meyer teaches the sensor communicates via Bluetooth technology [figure 2 shown wireless sensor 30]. As per claims 28-41, they do not teach or further define over the limitations recited in the rejected claims above. Therefore, claims 28-41 are also anticipated by Meyer for the same reasons set forth in the rejected claims above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Meyer (US Patent Application 20140343734) in the view of Haller (US Patent Application 20120305096). As per claim 24, Meyer does not teach the antenna board utilizes an NFC link to activate the switch. However, Haller teaches the antenna board utilizes an NFC link to activate the switch [0028, fig. 2-4, near field communication is used to enable the communication between the valve in order to activate an inactivate the device]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the design of Meyer to include the method of Haller to use near field communication that can closer to the device an enable the pressure adjustment or turn off the valve. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VOLVICK DEROSE whose telephone number is (571)272-6260. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jaweed Abbaszadeh can be reached on 571.270.1640. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VOLVICK DEROSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2176
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743283
UNIFIED BOOT IMAGE FOR MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737034
METHOD FOR DOCUMENTING A REPROCESSING OF A REUSABLE MEDICAL DEVICE AND ASSEMBLY THEREFOR
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730650
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC BOOT TRACKING BY AN EMBEDDED CONTROLLER
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724447
TECHNIQUES FOR CHANNEL CLOCK CONFIGURATIONS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717586
REPLACEMENT DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month