Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/927,440

COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2022 — CN 202210461503.3 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, JUSTIN YE
Art Unit
2644
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
580 granted / 722 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
736
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1/21/25 and 6/18/25 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21-24, 28-31 and 35-38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Raval et al. (US 2021/0022059 A1) in view of Centonza et al. (US 2017/0251396 A1). Consider claims 21, 28 and 35, Raval teaches a method, the method comprising: receiving, by a first access network device, first information from a first core network device (paragraph 6 and 42, stand alone (SA) BS), establishing, by the first access network device, a connection to the second core network device via the first core network device (paragraph 44, the IWF acts like an AMF tworkds the 5G SA gNB and acts like an MME towards EPC core. The gNB’s signaling to the EPC is relayed through the IWF. The gNB communicates with the EPC through the first core network device). Raval does not teach wherein the first information indicates to the first access network device to associate with a first public land mobile network (PLMN) via the first core network device, and the first PLMN corresponds to a second core network device. Centonza further teaches wherein the first information indicates to the first access network device to associate with a first public land mobile network (PLMN) via the first core network device (paragraph 164 and 171, a core network device signaling information to an access network device the information is the selected PLMN ID), and the first PLMN corresponds to a second core network device (paragraph 185, PLMN to core device correspondence). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify and include the above teachings for the purposes of furnishing the PLMN indication and PLMN to core correspondence so the base station associates with the correct PLMN served through the IWF and reaches the corresponding EPC device through the IWF). Consider claims 22, 29 and 36, Raval also teaches wherein there is a direct communication interface between the first access network device and the first core network device, and there is no direct communication interface between the first access network device and the second core network device (paragraph 6 and 44). Consider claims 23, 30 and 37, Centonza further teaches wherein the first information comprises a correspondence between the first core network device and at least one PLMN that comprises the first PLMN, and the first information further comprises a correspondence between the first PLMN and the second core network device (paragraph 180 and 185). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify and include the above teachings for the purposes of furnishing the PLMN indication and PLMN to core correspondence so the base station associates with the correct PLMN served through the IWF and reaches the corresponding EPC device through the IWF). Consider claims 24, 31 and 38, Centonza further teaches wherein the first information comprises a correspondence between the first core network device and at least one PLMN that comprises the first PLMN (paragraph 171, 180 and 185). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify and include the above teachings for the purposes of furnishing the PLMN indication and PLMN to core correspondence so the base station associates with the correct PLMN served through the IWF and reaches the corresponding EPC device through the IWF). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 25-27, 32-34 and 39-40 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN YE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-5258. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-8:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 5712705371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN Y LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644 9/29/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757165
METHOD FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, TERMINAL DEVICE, NETWORK DEVICE AND CHIP
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750448
ANOMALY DETECTION IN TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR IOT AND CONNECTED CARS USING SESSION, VOLUMETRIC, AND APN DATA ANALYSIS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745288
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739866
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF COMMUNICATING A MILLIMETERWAVE (MMWAVE) PHYSICAL LAYER (PHY) PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (PPDU) OVER AN MMWAVE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CHANNEL
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738995
TRANSMITTING METHOD, TRANSMITTING DEVICE, RECEIVING METHOD AND RECEIVING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 2m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month