Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/927,799

WIRE HARNESS ROUTING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Priority
Nov 07, 2023 — JP 2023-190010
Examiner
ROBINSON, KRYSTAL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
668 granted / 773 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
69.3%
+29.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on February 27, 2026, October 16, 2025 and October 25, 2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Osada (US 2015/0203058). In regards to claim 1, Osada et al. teaches a wire harness routing structure (see figure 2) comprising: a flat routing member (3) that has flexibility (flexible, paragraph [0026[); and a cover member (4b) to which the flat routing member is fixed (via receiving portions (40)), wherein the cover member (4b) is fixed to a vehicle body panel (4A/2b) of a vehicle (vehicle door, abstract) such that the flat routing member (3) is sandwiched with respect to the vehicle body panel (see figure 5A). In regards to claim 2, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 1, wherein the cover member (4b) includes a silencer that is capable of suppressing a sound of an engine room outside the vehicle body panel (vehicle door, abstract) from entering a vehicle interior (see paragraph [0026]; the low expansion layer or the solid sheet material and the high expansion layer can respectively insulate sounds in different frequency bands, and sounds in a wider frequency band can be insulated). In regards to claim 3, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 1, wherein a connector (34) is provided at an end portion of the flat routing member (3), and the cover member (4b) is provided with a through-hole through which the connector (34) is exposed (see the figure below). PNG media_image1.png 341 316 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 4, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 2, wherein a connector (34) is provided at an end portion of the flat routing member (3), and the cover member (4b) is provided with a through-hole through which the connector (34) is exposed (see the figure below). PNG media_image1.png 341 316 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 5, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 3, wherein the connector (34) is capable to be connected to a control device-side connector of a control device, and the connector and the control device-side connector are fitted depending on fastening of the control device to the vehicle body panel by a fastening member (One connector 34 is connected to a circuit on a power supply side while another connector 34 is connected to a circuit on a load side. This flat cable 3 is attached to the door trim 2B in a state in which the flat cable 3 is held inside the expanded sheet 4, and in which the connectors 34 are exposed outward (paragraph [0042]). In regards to claim 6, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 4, wherein the connector (34) is capable to be connected to a control device-side connector of a control device (One connector 34 is connected to a circuit on a power supply side while another connector 34 is connected to a circuit on a load side. This flat cable 3 is attached to the door trim 2B in a state in which the flat cable 3 is held inside the expanded sheet 4and in which the connectors 34 are exposed outward (paragraph [0042]), and the connector (34) and the control device-side connector are fitted depending on fastening of the control device to the vehicle body panel by a fastening member (paragraph [0042]). In regards to claim 7, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 1, wherein the flat routing member (3) has a shape that is point-symmetrical each other in a state where a pair of the flat routing members faces each other (see figure 2). In regards to claim 8, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 2, wherein the flat routing member (3) has a shape that is point-symmetrical each other in a state where a pair of the flat routing members faces each other (see figure 2). In regards to claim 9, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 1, further comprising: a groove portion (opening in the sheet (4)) that is formed in the vehicle body panel and accommodates the flat routing member (3) (see figure 3). In regards to claim 10, Osada et al. teaches the wire harness routing structure according to claim 2, further comprising: a groove portion (opening in the sheet (4)) that is formed in the vehicle body panel and accommodates the flat routing member (3) (see figure 3). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Williams (US 6,428,081) and Curtindale et al. (US 6,000,959) teaches a vehicle door wire harness. Williams (US) 6,428,081) teaches a rigid substrate and a wire harness. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRYSTAL ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)272-9258. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-5 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached on (571)-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRYSTAL ROBINSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677371
SUBSTRATE STRUCTURE CONNECTED ON BASIS OF SOLDER BALL AND ELASTIC BODY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676464
MOUNTABLE ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE WITH CONDUIT PASSTHROUGH
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671012
Power Supply Facility
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671016
ELECTRICAL FEEDTHROUGH ASSEMBLY
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12649429
OUTLET BOX
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (-5.6%)
1y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month