Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/928,051

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SERVER BASED CONTROL

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 27, 2024
Priority
Jan 09, 2012 — provisional 61/584,500 +6 more
Examiner
SURYAWANSHI, SURESH
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
May Patents Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
962 granted / 1088 resolved
+33.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1088 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-31 are presented for examination. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-31 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-26 of U.S. Patent No. 12192283. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both claim the same invention but worded slightly differently. A comparison between independent claim 1 of US Patent 12192283 and independent claim 1 of the current application is provided below for an example. US Patent 12192283 Current Application 18/928051 Claim 1. A method for voice control of a motion actuator and an electric light source in a battery-operated device, the device is configured to configured to communicate with an Internet-connected server via a first wireless network, the method comprising: producing, by a sensor, sensor data in response to a first physical phenomenon; capturing, by a microphone in the device, human voice data; transmitting, by a first transceiver via a first antenna in the device to the server via the first wireless network over the Internet, the captured human voice data; processing, by a processor in the server, the transmitted captured human voice data; receiving, by the first transceiver via the first antenna in the device from the server from the first wireless network over the Internet, a second data that is in response to the processing; causing, by the motion actuator in the device, a linear or rotary motion in response to the received second data and to the sensor data; emitting, by the electric light source in the device, a visible light for illumination or indication in response to the received second data and to the sensor data; receiving, by a second transceiver via a second antenna over a second wireless network that is distinct from the first wireless network, a third data; causing, by the motion actuator in the device, a linear or rotary motion in response to the received third data; and directly or indirectly affecting, changing, producing, by an actuator, the first physical phenomenon, wherein the first physical phenomenon comprises a temperature, humidity, pressure, audio, vibration, sound, proximity, or flow rate. Claim 1. A device for voice control for use with first and second wireless networks, the device comprising: a sensor for producing sensor data in response to a first physical phenomenon; multiple microphones for capturing human voice data; a first antenna for coupling to the first wireless network; a first transceiver coupled to the first antenna for transmitting to, and for receiving from, the first wireless network; a second antenna for coupling to the second wireless network; a second transceiver coupled to the second antenna for transmitting to, and for receiving from, the second wireless network; a motion actuator for causing a linear or rotary motion in response to a first command; a second actuator for directly or indirectly affecting, changing, producing, the first physical phenomenon, in response to a second command; an electric light source for emitting a visible light for illumination or indication, in response to a third command; and a single enclosure for housing the sensor, the multiple microphones, the first and second antennas, the first and second transceivers, the motion actuator, the second actuator, and the electric light source, wherein the device is configured to send to a server over the first or second wireless network by the first transceiver via the first antenna the captured human voice data and the sensor data, to receive over the first or second wireless network by the first transceiver via the first antenna from the server the first, second, and third commands, and in response to respectively activate or control the motion actuator, the second actuator, and the electric light source. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “a first physical phenomenon” is not defined as it was done in US Patent 12192283 (last paragraph of the claim 1). Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: limitation of “a first transceiver coupled to the first antenna for transmitting to, and for receiving from, the first wireless network” is unclear regarding what is transmitted or received. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: limitation of “a second transceiver coupled to the second antenna for transmitting to, and for receiving from, the second wireless network” is unclear regarding what is transmitted or received. Appropriate correction is required. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-9730144 discloses system and method for mixed-mesh wireless networking. US-20140074472 discloses a voice control system, more particularly to a voice control system with a portable voice control device for controlling operation of an electrical appliance. TW-M394648 discloses wireless transmission device wherein a receiving device includes a voice control module for receiving and processing an externally generated sound source, and outputting a trigger signal according to the processing result. JP-2008228129 discloses a remote control device that recognizes a voice by inputting a voice, wirelessly communicates with a second wireless device carried by a speaker, further wirelessly communicates with a device equipped with the first wireless device, and controls the device, EP-1079352 discloses a remote voice control system for controlling a television set having a microphone and a transmitter for transmitting words spoken by a user via a second wireless transmission channel to device for controlling device via speech recognition. KR-20010020875 discloses method and apparatus for controlling voice controlled devices. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SURESH K SURYAWANSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-3668. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M Lo can be reached at 5712729774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SURESH SURYAWANSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771132
UTILIZING POWER INFRASTRUCTURE TO PROVIDE STABLE REFERENCE FREQUENCY
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760921
HVAC SENSOR INFORMATION AND SENSOR COMMUNICATION OVER RELAY-CONTROLLED POWER LINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760753
PUMP CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND PUMP CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12743060
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING FOR AUTOMATED DEVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741397
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING SURFACE PROFILES OF WAFERS SLICED IN A WIRE SAW
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1088 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month