Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/928,234

VIDEO TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, VIDEO TRANSMISSION METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Examiner
TEKLE, DANIEL T
Art Unit
2481
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
462 granted / 732 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-13 and 15-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-13 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yang et al. US 2016/0297545. In regarding to claim 1 Yang teaches: 1. A method performed by a computer and comprising: acquiring first information on a range specified on a map; [0293] Referring to FIG. 23 (a), the controller 180 can control the display unit 151 to output at least a part of capturing information of an image captured by the drone 500 on a map screen 2300 including a region at which the image is captured. As an example, if a command for checking the capturing information of the image captured by the drone 500 on a map is detected, the controller 180 outputs the map screen 2300 of a predetermined range on the display unit 151 and can display an indicator indicating at least a part of capturing information corresponding to the output map screen 2300 among the capturing information on the map screen 2300. A user can change a range of a region included in the map screen 2300, i.e., a scale of a map. Yang, 0293-0295, emphasis added and transmitting, based on second information identifying a user, a video to a video receiving apparatus, the video being captured by a camera mounted on a drone in the range, [0250] FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating explaining an example of a method for a mobile terminal to edit and store capturing information corresponding to an image data captured by a drone according to one embodiment of the present invention. The controller 180 of the mobile terminal 100 stores an image data obtained by the camera 540 of the drone 500 in the memory 170 and can temporarily store capturing information obtained in response to the image data in the memory 170 Yang, 0250-0251, emphasis added wherein transmitting the video comprises, in a case where an input indicating a request to distribute the video is received from a device which displays the map, receiving the video from the drone and transmitting the received video to the video receiving apparatus. [0298] Specifically, if a command for selecting one of indicators displayed on the map screen 2300 is detected, the controller 180 can control the wireless communication unit 110 to transmit capturing information corresponding to the selected indicator from among the capturing information to the external device or the external server. Yang, 0279, 0298-0299, emphasis added In regarding to claim 2 Yang teaches: 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises transmitting the video to a plurality of video receiving apparatuses. Yang, 0279, 0298-0299 In regarding to claim 3 Yang teaches: 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises acquiring third information for identifying the drone mounting the camera. Yang, 0233, 0236, In regarding to claim 5 Yang teaches: 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first information indicates a pre-defined range. Yang, 0197-0198, In regarding to claim 6 Yang teaches: 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first information is generated to define the range in response to specifying a certain range on the map displayed on the device, and the device is a display device. Yang, 0197-0198, 0293 Claims 7-9 and 11 list all similar elements of claims 1-3 and 5, but in system form rather than method form. Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claims 1-3 and 5 applies equally as well to claims 7-9 and 11. Claims 12-13 and 15-17 list all similar elements of claims 1-3 and 5-6, but in apparatus form rather than method form. Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claims 1-3 and 5-6 applies equally as well to claims 12-13 and 15-17. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL T TEKLE whose telephone number is (571)270-1117. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at 571-272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL T TEKLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602804
Method for Processing Three-dimensional Scanning, Three-dimensional Scanning Device, and Computer-readable Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603969
PARKING VIDEO RECORDING DEVICE, A TELEMATICS SERVER AND A METHOD FOR RECORDING A PARKING VIDEO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587615
MULTI-STREAM PEAK BANDWIDTH DISPERSAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573430
INTERACTIVE VIDEO ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12548219
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION 3D IMAGES USING LASER ABLATION AND MICROSCOPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (-6.9%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month