Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/928,390

UNDER VOLTAGE LOCK-OUT CIRCUIT

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Dec 13, 2021 — continuation of 12/132,470
Examiner
RETEBO, METASEBIA T
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tagore Technology Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
585 granted / 655 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
70.3%
+30.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,132,470. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim of the instant application is directed to essentially similar limitation as in claim 1 of US Patent No. 12,132,470. Claim 1 of the instant application is broader than claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,132,470 by omitting other features recited in claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,132,470 such as “a GaN FET power switch; and a driver for the GaN FET power switch, the driver including: a reference device for generating a reference voltage, a GaN-based under-voltage detector having a first input terminal receiving a supply voltage, a second input terminal for receiving a voltage at ground potential, a third input terminal receiving the reference voltage, and an output terminal, wherein the reference voltage is referred to the supply voltage, and wherein the GaN-based under-voltage detector outputs an under voltage lock-out signal when the supply voltage is below a low-to-high threshold value, and does not output the under voltage lock-out signal when the supply voltage is above the low-to-high threshold value and for a predetermined amount of time after the supply voltage first rises above the low-to-high threshold value ” Instant application 18/928390 US Patent US 12,132,470 1. An under voltage lock-out circuit for producing an undervoltage lock-out signal upon detection of an under-voltage condition of a supply voltage. comprising: a supply voltage input; an under voltage lock-out signal output; and a pulse stretcher comprising an input terminal coupled to the under voltage lock-out signal output, the pulse stretcher operating to produce a stretched under voltage lock-out signal based on receipt of an under-voltage condition indication on the undervoltage lock-out signal output, wherein the pulse stretcher includes: a first stretcher transistor having a drain, a source coupled to ground potential, and a gate coupled to the input terminal of the pulse stretcher, a first stretcher resistor coupled between the supply voltage input and the drain of the first stretcher transistor, a second stretcher resistor having one end coupled to the drain of the first stretcher transistor, a first capacitor coupled between another end of the second stretcher resistor and ground potential, a first diode having an anode coupled to the other end of the second stretcher resistor, a third stretcher resistor having one end coupled to a cathode of the first diode, a second capacitor coupled between another end of the third stretcher resistor and ground potential, a second diode having an anode coupled to another end of the third stretcher resistor, a third diode having an anode coupled to ground potential. a second stretcher transistor having a drain coupled to the other end of the third stretcher resistor, a source coupled to ground potential, and a gate coupled to the input terminal of the pulse stretcher, a third stretcher transistor having a drain, a gate coupled to the other end of the third stretcher resistor, and a source coupled to ground potential, and a fourth resistor coupled between the supply voltage input and the drain of the third stretcher transistor, wherein the stretched under voltage lock-out signal is produced at the drain of the third stretcher transistor. 1. An electronic circuit comprising: a GaN FET power switch; and a driver for the GaN FET power switch, the driver including: a reference device for generating a reference voltage, a GaN-based under-voltage detector having a first input terminal receiving a supply voltage, a second input terminal for receiving a voltage at ground potential, a third input terminal receiving the reference voltage, and an output terminal, wherein the reference voltage is referred to the supply voltage, and wherein the GaN-based under-voltage detector outputs an under voltage lock-out signal when the supply voltage is below a low-to-high threshold value, and does not output the under voltage lock-out signal when the supply voltage is above the low-to-high threshold value, and a pulse stretcher having an input terminal coupled to the output terminal of the GaN-based under-voltage detector, and an output terminal for outputting a stretched under voltage lock-out signal for a predetermined amount of time after the supply voltage first rises above the low-to-high threshold value, the pulse stretcher comprising: a first transistor having a drain, a source coupled to ground potential, and a gate coupled to the input terminal of the pulse stretcher, a first resistor coupled between the supply voltage and the drain of the first transistor, a second resistor having one end coupled to the drain of the first transistor, a first capacitor coupled between another end of the second resistor and ground potential, a first diode having an anode coupled to the other end of the second resistor, a third resistor having one end coupled to a cathode of the first diode, a second capacitor coupled between another end of the third resistor and ground potential, a second diode having an anode coupled to another end of the third resistor, a third diode having an anode coupled to a cathode of the second diode and a cathode coupled to ground potential, a second transistor having a drain coupled to the other end of the third resistor, a source coupled to ground potential, and a gate coupled to the input terminal of the pulse stretcher, a third transistor having a drain, a gate coupled to the other end of the third resistor, and a source coupled to ground potential, and a fourth resistor coupled between the supply voltage and the drain of the third transistor, wherein the stretched under voltage lock-out signal is produced at the drain of the third transistor. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-10, 12-13 and 15-24 are allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to METASEBIA T RETEBO whose telephone number is (571)272-9299. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8:30 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at 571-270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /METASEBIA T RETEBO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676617
DETERMINISTIC JITTER COMPENSATION SCHEME FOR DTC TIMING PATH
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676609
DEGRADATIONS DETECTION FOR MOS-TRANSISTORS AND GATE-DRIVERS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671410
Miller Clamping Circuit for Driving Wide Bandgap High Voltage Power Device
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665583
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE CAPABLE OF SHORTENING TURN-OFF TIME OF CONTROLLED SOURCE IN ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652040
DIP INJECTION FOR GATE DRIVERS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.4%)
1y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month