Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/928,791

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Nov 01, 2023 — JP 2023-187530
Examiner
BUKOWSKI, KENNETH
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Alps Alpine Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 809 resolved
+5.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
832
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
78.3%
+38.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Arguments filed 24 April 2026 have been fully considered. However, Kim continues to read on claims 1 and 3, as amended. New claim limitations are addressed in the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (US 2016.0193323). Regarding claim 1, Kim disclose: A display device configured to be attached to a panel having a first opening and a second opening. the display device comprising: a case movably attached to an inside of the panel: a display unit disposed in the case; and a moving mechanism provided inside the panel, the moving mechanism being configured to move the display unit using power, and wherein the display unit is stopped at a position where a part of a display screen protrudes from each of the first opening and the second opening (see Fig. 1-14; display panel 110 movably attached to inside of panel 20; first/second openings on 20 above/below area 23; moving mechanism 130 provided inside 20, configured to move display 110 using power (e.g., motor 131); where at least a portion of the display unit is stopped in a position where 110 is protruding out both the first and second openings) wherein the moving mechanism includes a guide hole provided in the case and extending along the display unit, and a shaft portion slidably inserted into the guide hole, wherein the display unit is moved relative to the first opening and the second opening as the shaft portion is guided by the guide hole (see Fig. 9, 10, 12; case 141/142/136; moving mechanism has guide hole at 135 extending along display unit; shaft portion 134 inserted into 135 where display is moved relative to the first/second openings as the shaft is guided through the hole). Regarding claim 2, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit is moved by the moving mechanism to change a dimension of a protrusion of the display screen from the first opening and a dimension of a protrusion of the display screen from the second opening (see Fig. 1-5, 7-10). Regarding claim 3, claim 3 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 1, where Kim further disclose: wherein the display unit is stopped at a position where at least a part of the display screen protrudes from the first opening and at a position where at least a part of the display screen protrudes from the second opening (see Fig. 1-14; where at least a portion of the display unit is stopped in a position where 110 is protruding out both the first and second openings) Regarding claim 4, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit moved by the moving mechanism is stopped at a position where a part of or an entirety of the display screen protrudes only from the first opening (see Fig. 1-5, 7-10). Regarding claim 5, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit is moved by the moving mechanism to change a dimension of a protrusion of the display screen from the first opening (see Fig. 1-5, 7-10). Regarding claim 6, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit moved by the moving mechanism is stopped at a position where a part of or an entirety of the display screen protrudes only from the second opening (see Fig. 13). Regarding claim 7, the rejection of claim 6 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit is moved by the moving mechanism to change a dimension of a protrusion of the display screen from the second opening (see Fig. 13). Regarding claim 8, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the panel is a part of a dashboard, an instrument panel, or a console provided in a vehicle interior, and wherein the first opening opens upward, and the second opening opens downward (see Fig. 1-3). Regarding claim 9, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: an operation portion is provided on a surface of the dashboard, the instrument panel, or the console between the first opening and the second opening (see Fig. 5-6; [0063-0064]; operation portion 23). Regarding claim 10, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: a display portion is provided on a surface of the dashboard, the instrument panel, or the console between the first opening and the second opening (see Fig. 5-6; [0063-0064]; display portion 23). Regarding claim 11, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the guide hole is a cam hole having a bent portion, and wherein a posture of the display unit relative to the panel is changed as the shaft portion passes through the bent portion (see [0141]; where guide hole 135 has bend (e.g., thread of the nut portion) such that as display moves between 1st and second openings, the posture is changed). Regarding claim 12, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the guide hole is a cam hole having a bent portion, and wherein a posture of the display unit relative to the panel is changed as the shaft portion passes through the bent portion (see [0141]; where guide hole 135 has bend (e.g., thread of the nut portion) such that as display moves between 1st and second openings, the posture is changed). Regarding claim 13, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit is movable along the guide hole to an upper limit position, a lower limit position, and a neutral position located between the upper limit position and the lower limit position, and wherein the display unit is configured to have a first angle relative to a horizontal direction in a state in which the display unit is stopped at the neutral position or the upper limit position, and to have a second angle, which is smaller than the first angle, relative to the horizontal direction in a state in which the display unit is stopped at the lower limit position (see Fig. 9, 10; where the ‘neutral’ position is between the lower and upper limits, wherein the angle of the display changes as it is movable as the shaft guide hole move with respect to each other). Regarding claim 14, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Kim further disclose: the display unit is movable along the guide hole to an upper limit position, a lower limit position, and a neutral position located between the upper limit position and the lower limit position, and wherein the display unit is configured to have a first angle relative to a horizontal direction in a state in which the display unit is stopped at the neutral position or the upper limit position, and to have a second angle, which is smaller than the first angle, relative to the horizontal direction in a state in which the display unit is stopped at the lower limit position (see Fig. 9, 10; where the ‘neutral’ position is between the lower and upper limits, wherein the angle of the display changes as it is movable as the shaft guide hole move with respect to each other). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH BUKOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-7913. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday // 0730-1530. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571.272.7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /kenneth bukowski/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676095
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROJECTING IMAGE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658125
CONTROL DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651549
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL USING THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646450
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DRIVING METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638686
HARDWARE AND HOUSING SETUP FOR WEARABLE AUGMENTED REALITY APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 11m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month