Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 27, 2026
Application No. 18/929,115

EDGE COMPUTE ENVIRONMENT CONFIGURATION TOOL FOR A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT§DP
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Jul 30, 2020 — provisional 63/059,007 +2 more
Examiner
DOAN, DUYEN MY
Art Unit
2459
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
CenturyLink Intellectual Property LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 678 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
700
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.3%
+43.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2024 and 1/30/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-13 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of patent 12,137,028 and claims 1-20 of patent 11,831,500. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims invention of the above patents anticipates the claims invention of the instant application. Instant Claim 1: A method for managing a communications network, the method comprising: obtaining site information associated with an edge site of the communications network; generating, based on the site information associated with the edge site of the communications network, a configuration process for instantiating a compute service available from the edge site, the configuration process comprising a set of instructions for configuring an operational status of at least one network edge device of the edge site to provide the compute service; and configuring, based on the configuration process, the at least one network edge device to provide the compute service. Conflicting Claim 1 of patent 12,137,028: A method for managing a communications network, the method comprising: obtaining site information associated with an edge site of the communications network; generating, based on the site information associated with the edge site of the communications network, a configuration process for instantiating a compute service available from the edge site, the configuration process comprising a set of instructions for configuring an operational status of at least one network edge device of the edge site to provide the compute service to a requesting device in communication with the edge site; and configuring, based on the configuration process, the at least one network edge device to provide the compute service. Conflicting Claim 1 of patent 11,831,500: A method for managing a communications network, the method comprising: obtaining, from a plurality of databases, site information associated with an edge site of the communications network, wherein each of the plurality of databases is associated with a different backbone communications network; generating, based on the site information associated with the edge site of the communications network, a configuration process for instantiating a compute service available from the edge site, the configuration process comprising a set of instructions for configuring an operational status of at least one network edge device of the edge site to provide the compute service to a requesting device in communication with the edge site; and configuring, based on the configuration process, the at least one network edge device to provide the compute service. Instant claim 2 corresponds to conflicting claims 2 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 3 corresponds to conflicting claims 3 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 4 corresponds to conflicting claims 4 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 5 corresponds to conflicting claims 5 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 6 corresponds to conflicting claims 6 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 7 corresponds to conflicting claims 7 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 8 corresponds to conflicting claims 8 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 9 corresponds to conflicting claims 9 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 10 corresponds to conflicting claims 17 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 11 corresponds to conflicting claims 18 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 12 corresponds to conflicting claims 19 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 13 corresponds to conflicting claims 20 of patent 12,137,028. Instant claim 2 corresponds to conflicting claims 2 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 3 corresponds to conflicting claims 3 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 4 corresponds to conflicting claims 4 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 5 corresponds to conflicting claims 5 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 6 corresponds to conflicting claims 6 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 7 corresponds to conflicting claims 7 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 8 corresponds to conflicting claims 8 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 9 corresponds to conflicting claims 9 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 10 corresponds to conflicting claims 17 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 11 corresponds to conflicting claims 18 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 12 corresponds to conflicting claims 19 of patent 11,831,500. Instant claims 13 corresponds to conflicting claims 20 of patent 11,831,500. The instant claims merely broaden the scope of the conflicting claims. It is well settled that broadening the scope of claims would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the narrower issued claims. In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982) and In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13 are allowed over the cited prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jain et al (us 2019/0349404) discloses a method for protecting an enterprise network includes, at a system that is remote from the enterprise network: controlling communications to and from the enterprise network according to a set of security policies; controlling endpoint to endpoint connections within the enterprise network according to the set of security policies; receiving a request for modifications to the set of policies; automatically generating a policy digest formatted according to a predefined format, the policy digest comprising the modifications, and storing the policy digest in the memory; retrieving the policy digest from the memory; generating one or more calls to one or more system components that control the communications to and from the enterprise network and the endpoint to endpoint connections based on the policy digest; and modifying control of the communications and the endpoint to endpoint connections based on the one or more calls. Groenewald et al (us 11,546,219) discloses a method for enabling users of a cloud provider network to define and use custom “virtual regions” comprised of selected sets of cloud provider network infrastructure locations. A cloud provider network enables users to obtain information about available infrastructure locations and to identify locations that satisfy a set of performance characteristics and other parameters. Once a set of desirable infrastructure locations have been identified, users can request the creation of a virtual region to be associated with their user account, where the request specifies a set of infrastructure locations to comprise the virtual region. Once a virtual region is created, users can cause computing resources to be launched into or otherwise associated with the virtual region in a manner similar to the use of existing regions and availability zones. Peter et al (us 11,558,363) discloses a device may receive data relating to a site plan and image data relating to a network device. The device may determine a device identifier based on the image data, associate the device identifier with the site plan based on a common attribute between the network device and the site plan, and cause a certificate to be generated based on an authentication request to a network controller. The authentication request may cause the network controller to generate the certificate based on the device identifier and/or the site plan. The device may cause an Internet protocol (IP) address to be assigned to the network device based on the certificate, a location of the network device, and/or another related parameter, cause a node configuration to be generated based on the IP address, the device identifier, and/or the site plan, and provision the network device according to the node configuration. Cheloff (us 2014/0164580) disclose a method involves receiving a site location for a computing device by a generation module executing on a device management server. An address of the device management server is identified. An optical representation of a configuration is generated corresponding to the site location and the address. The optical representation of the configuration is provided to the computing device by an interface module running on the device management server. The communication corresponding to the configuration is received from the computing device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUYEN MY DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4226. The examiner can normally be reached (571)272-4226. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia Dollinger can be reached at (571)272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUYEN M DOAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12652256
SCHEDULING MECHANISMS FOR APPROXIMATING FINE-GRAINED, PER-FLOW RATE ADJUSTMENTS AND CYCLE-GRANULARITY INTER-PACKET SPACING IN NETWORK APPLICATIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12634213
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TWO-TIER REPORTING FOR CLOUD COMPUTING REALMS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621210
NETWORK SERVICE DEPLOYMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615554
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK SLICE DEPLOYMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609997
DYNAMIC AND STATIC DATA OF METADATA OBJECTS
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.2%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month