Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/929,147

Display Device

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0150149
Examiner
QUARTERMAN, KEVIN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
721 granted / 872 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
895
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 872 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim (US 2024/0206228). Regarding independent claim 1, Kim teaches a display device comprising a substrate (Fig. 4, Element 111; ¶ [0107]); a plurality of sub-pixels (Fig. 4, Elements T_SP/B_SP; ¶ [0075]) on the substrate, the plurality of sub-pixels comprising a sub-pixel including an emissive area and a circuit area (Figs. 4 and 10, Element 120; ¶s [0112], [0126]); a first overcoat layer (Fig. 4, Element 115e; ¶ [0146]) on the substrate; a first sub anode electrode (Fig. 4, Element 131a; ¶ [0153]) on the first overcoat layer; a second overcoat layer (Fig. 4, Element 131b; ¶ [0153]) on a portion of the first sub anode electrode that is in the emissive area; a second sub anode electrode (Fig. 4, Element 131c; ¶ [0153]) on the second overcoat layer in the emissive area, the second sub anode electrode overlapping the first sub anode electrode in the emissive area; an organic light emitting layer (Fig. 4, Element 132; ¶ [0107]) covering the first sub anode electrode, the second overcoat layer, and the second sub anode electrode in the emissive area; and a cathode electrode (Fig. 4, Element 133; ¶ [0107]) on the organic light emitting layer in the emissive area. Regarding claim 9, Kim teaches a bank layer (Fig. 4, Element 115g; ¶ [0155]) defining the emissive area of the sub-pixel; wherein the organic light emitting layer covers the first sub anode electrode, the second overcoat layer, the second sub anode electrode, and the bank layer. Regarding claim 17, Kim teaches the cathode electrode on an upper surface and a side surface of the second overcoat layer and reflects light generated from the organic light emitting layer in a direction towards the substrate (¶ [0181]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 20-24 are allowed. Claims 2-8, 10-16, and 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, the prior art of record neither shows or suggests a display comprising, in addition to other limitations of the claim, the first sub anode electrode comprising a first emitter in the emissive area; a first contact in the circuit area, the first contact contacting a transistor in the circuit area; and a first connector that connects the first emitter and the first contact, and wherein the second sub anode the first sub anode electrode or the second sub anode electrode includes a break through an entire thickness of the first sub anode electrode or an entire thickness of the second sub anode electrode responsive to a subpixel that includes the first sub anode electrode and the second sub anode electrode being defective second emitter in the emissive area; a second contact in the circuit area, the second contact electrically connecting the second sub anode electrode to the transistor; and a second connector connecting the second emitter and the second contact. Due to their dependencies upon claim 2, claims 3-8, 10-16, and 18-19 are also allowable. Regarding independent claim 20, the prior art of record neither shows or suggests a display comprising, in addition to other limitations of the claim, a first overcoat layer on an emissive area and a circuit area; a second overcoat layer in the emissive area without the second overcoat layer extending to the circuit area, the second overcoat layer including an upper surface and an inclined side surface that extends from the upper surface to a first sub anode electrode; a second sub anode electrode that is on the upper surface of the second overcoat layer in the emissive area; a light emitting layer over the second sub anode electrode and the second overcoat layer in the emissive area, the light emitting layer including a first inclined portion having an end that contacts a portion of the first sub anode electrode in the emissive area and extends toward the upper surface of the second overcoat layer along the inclined side surface of the second overcoat layer, and a second portion that extends from the first inclined portion of the light emitting layer and contacts the second sub anode electrode and the upper surface of the second overcoat layer; and a cathode electrode on the light emitting layer in the emissive area, the cathode electrode including a first inclined portion having an end that is closer to the substrate than the second sub anode electrode but farther from the substrate than the end of the first inclined portion of the light emitting layer and extends along the first inclined portion of the light emitting layer, and a second portion of the cathode electrode that extends from the first inclined portion of the cathode electrode and contacts the second portion of the light emitting layer such that the second portion of the cathode electrode overlaps the second sub anode electrode and the second overcoat layer. Due to their dependencies upon claim 20, claims 21-24 are also allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Im (US 2016/0351638) teaches an organic light emitting display device with a pad area including a signal pad. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Quarterman whose telephone number is (571)272-2461. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Quarterman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 26 June 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672473
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666766
DISPLAY DEVICE CAPABLE OF ADJUSTING A VIEWING ANGLE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660454
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660423
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660474
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 872 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month