Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/929,227

FRAME STRUCTURE CONFIGURATION METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FULL DUPLEX COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0053821 +2 more
Examiner
LEE, CHI HO A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
KT Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1273 granted / 1382 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1410
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-15 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by YOU et al PG PUB 2024/0388413. Re Claims 1, 7 and 13, YOU et al teaches in figure 16, S161, a terminal (a communication device comprising a processor and memory) for receiving configuration information (subband configuration) for full duplex communication [0167] from a base station; based on the configuration indicating a first and second frequency resources (subband frequency resource allocation information) [0075], See figure 18, performing DL on first frequency resource and UL on second frequency resource [0305] wherein a location of a frequency resource of the subband is based on CRB [0346]. Re Claims 2, 8, 14, YOU et al teaches the configuration information is received via RRC signaling (a higher layer signaling) [0222] based on downlink and/or uplink BWP (single BWP) [0183]. Re Claims 3, 9, 15, YOU et al teaches the frequency resource allocation is configured based on a predetermined subcarrier spacing-based carrier bandwidth [0223]. Re Claims 5, 11, 17, YOU et al teaches in figure 18, guard bands are configured with RBs at the upper part and/or a lower part adjacent to the subband in a frequency doamind [0293] and a size of the guard band is based on at least subcarrier spacing of a system bandwidth (a carrier bandwidth), UL and DL BWPs [0295]. Re Claims 6, 12, 18, YOU et al teaches in figure 19, the configuration information includes Subbands 1-6 (subband identification or a subband index). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 10 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YOU et al PG PUB 2024/0388413 in view of SHIM et al PG PUB 2024/0380563. Re Claims 4, 10, 16, YOU et al teaches subband is configured in association with a single DL BWP and/or UL BWP but fails to explicitly teach “configured as a BWP pair having the same BWP ID”. However, SHIM et al teaches operation of FD, a pair for a BWP pair with the same BWP ID, UL BWP and DL BWP should be satisfied [0234]. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to satisfied the UL BWP and DL BWP to support the FD operation. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled to have combined the teachings. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-3130. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KASSIM KHALAD can be reached at 5712703770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750861
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INDICATING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNEL MONITORING, AND MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745258
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING POSITION OF CONTROL CHANNEL ELEMENT, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745175
Network Energy Saving for Bandwidth Part
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739842
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHODS WITH ENHANCED DUPLEX
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739843
Conditions for Skipping Resource Evaluation for Sidelink
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month