Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/930,086

METAL VANADATES AS OXYGEN CARRIERS FOR DEHYDROGENATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 29, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2023 — provisional 63/597,080
Examiner
CAMPANELL, FRANCIS C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
United States Department of Energy
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
652 granted / 894 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
909
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.9%
+17.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 894 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-17 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kung et al (US 4777319). Kung teaches a method of oxidative dehydrogenation of alkanes to alkenes. See title, abstract. The alkanes have 3-6 carbons, with butane being preferred. See column 4 lines 13-27. This is the entirety of the feedstock. The method makes contact with a magnesium vanadate catalyst (column 2) with an oxidizing gas. This includes oxygen air, nitrogen, helium and others, see column 4 bottom half. The reaction oxidizes the catalyst. The catalyst has a surface area of above 28 m2/g, see table 1 column 6. No Sc, Ti Zn or Zn oxides are necessary for use, the catalyst can be 100 of the vanadate. The process takes place at 300C to 700C, See column 4 lines 3-13. Claim(s) 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kung et al (US 4777319) and Delorme et al (US 5510553). To see what kung teaches please see above. Kung does not teach catalyst regeneration to reoxidize the catalyst. Delorme teaches catalytic dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons (abstract, title) using a vanadate catalyst. See column 2 lines 50-70. This is regenerated/ reoxidized in a second vessel to be used again as a catalyst in a first vessel. See column 3 lines 58 to column 4 lines 7. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the process of Kung to regenerate the catalyst as taught in Delorme. This has the advantage of regenerating the catalyst for reuse. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANK C CAMPANELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3165. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Prem Singh can be reached at 571-272-6381. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANCIS C CAMPANELL/Examiner, Art Unit 1771 /PREM C SINGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747195
OLIGOMERIZATION WITH ION-EXCHANGED ZEOLITES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747397
UPGRADING BIO-WASTE IN FCC
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735371
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LINEAR ALPHA OLEFINS PRODUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735652
LUBRICANT COMPOSITION COMPRISING CARBON NANOTUBES
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12709587
PROCESS FOR CONVERTING OXYGENATES TO DISTILLATE FUELS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 894 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month