Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/930,213

IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND IMAGE DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 29, 2024
Examiner
CHOW, VAN NGUYEN
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
696 granted / 838 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 838 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshino et al. (US 2005/0174457) in view of Jang (US 2010/0289923). Regarding claims 1, 5, 6, Yoshino et al. figs. 1, 5, discloses an image processing apparatus that causes an image to be displayed, the image processing apparatus comprising: one or more processors; and one or more memories storing instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to perform (the image processor 20, an image display memory 24); causing a plurality of low-resolution images to be displayed; selecting an image from the plurality of low-resolution images based on a user selecting instruction; causing the selected image to be displayed in a predetermined size (When an image (JPEG file) stored in a recording medium is to be displayed, low resolution image data in 640.times.480 pixel size equivalent to the resolution of the display unit and high resolution image data in an original high resolution indicated with the image file are generated. In the initial stage, the low resolution image data is displayed) (FIG. 4, if an image to be reproduced requires rotation, first, 640.times.480 pixel low resolution image data and high resolution image data are generated in the memory 30. Then the low resolution image data is rotate-processed, then further compressed to the 360.times.480 pixel size, then transferred to the image display memory 24 and is displayed); enlarging the selected image being displayed in the predetermined size ([0125] First, at step S20, it is determined whether the request is an enlargement or compression request. If it is determined that the request is an enlargement request, the process proceeds to step S21, at which it is determined whether or not the current enlargement ratio .alpha. is a maximum scaling .alpha.max. If it is determined that the current enlargement ratio is .alpha.max, as further enlargement cannot be made, the request is ignored. The process returns to step S9 (FIG. 5). [0126] Further, if it is determined that the current enlargement ratio .alpha. is lower than the maximum scaling .alpha.max, the process proceeds to step S22, at which the scaling is increased by .DELTA..alpha. (positive value). The value .DELTA..alpha. may be any value. However, as the number of operations to display in the maximum scaling increases if a small value is used, the value is 25% in the present embodiment. As the resolution of the image display unit 28 is 640.times.480 pixels and that of the image sensing device is 2592.times.1944 pixels, the number of enlargement steps is 16. [0127] When the enlargement ratio has been determined, the process proceeds to step S23, at which the cut out size from the high resolution image data is determined with the enlargement central position Q at that time. At step S24, the cut image is resized to 640.times.480 pixels, and at step S25, the resized image data is transferred to the image display memory 24 and is displayed); causing the high-resolution image to be displayed at a position where the selected image is displayed after the acquisition of the high-resolution image is completed (The rotated high resolution image data is overwritten in the memory 24. When the rotation processing has been completed, an area defined with the cut out positions P1 and P2 is cut out, then the image, resized to 640.times.480 pixels corresponding to the display resolution of the image display unit 28, is generated in the memory 30, then transferred to the image display memory 24 and is displayed). However, Yoshino et al. (US 2005/0174457) is silent about acquiring a high-resolution image associated with the selected image from an external apparatus based on a user enlarging instruction. It would have been obvious to the skilled in the art before the effective filing date to provide acquiring a high-resolution image associated with the selected image from an external apparatus based on a user enlarging instruction, in Yoshino et al., as suggested Jang (US 2010/0289923), the motivation in order to reproduce images on an external display apparatus connectable to the digital image processing. Regarding claim 2, the combination Yoshino et al. figs. 1, 5, and Jang (US 2010/0289923), discloses the image processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the user enlarging instruction is based on at least one operation of a click operation, a pinch-in, a pinch-out, a change in line of sight, and a change in open and close states of eyelids (Yoshino et al. [0056] Among the display contents of the display unit 54, contents displayed on the LCD or the like are single-shot/continuous-shot image sensing, a self-timer, a compression ratio, the number of recording pixels, the number of recorded images, the number of recordable images, a shutter speed, an aperture value, exposure correction, flash, pink-eye effect mitigation, macro image sensing, a buzzer, a timer battery level, a battery level, an error, information by plural digits of numeric characters, an attached/detached status of recording media 200 and 210, an communication I/F operation, date and time, and the like). Regarding claim 3, the combination Yoshino et al. figs. 1, 3, 5, and Jang (US 2010/0289923), discloses the image processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of low-resolution images is sequentially displayed in response to a swipe operation by a user (Further, as shown in FIG. 4, if an image to be reproduced requires rotation, first, 640.times.480 pixel low resolution image data and high resolution image data are generated in the memory 30. Then the low resolution image data is rotate-processed, then further compressed to the 360.times.480 pixel size, then transferred to the image display memory 24 and is displayed….That is, in a case where only the left switch 305 and the right switch 306 of the operation disk 310 are operated to sequentially display images, low resolution image data are utilized as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. As a result, regarding the frame advance/reverse operation with high frequency of use, image display updating can be performed without user discomfort) pars. 59, 67). Regarding claim 4, the combination Yoshino et al. figs. 1, 5, and Jang (US 2010/0289923), discloses the image processing apparatus according to claim1, wherein the high-resolution image is acquired from the external apparatus via a network (see Jang pars. 78, 97). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Van N Chow whose telephone number is (571)272-7590. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Ke can be reached at 5712727776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VAN N CHOW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579954
LIQUID DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572314
MULTIPLE DISPLAYS IN A FULL-FACE RESPIRATORY PROTECTED FACEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567389
DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567388
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACTIVE MATRIX DISPLAYS, CORRESPONDING CONTROLLER, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560820
OPTICAL IMAGE STABILIZATION UNIT CAPABLE OF BEING MINIATURIZED, LENS BARREL, AND OPTICAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 838 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month