Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/930,567

MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 29, 2024
Priority
Dec 20, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0186891
Examiner
SINCLAIR, DAVID M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
869 granted / 1270 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1329
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1270 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-15, & 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP2012231078A hereafter referred to as Sato. In regards to claim 1, Sato discloses A multilayer electronic component, comprising: a body (2 – fig. 1, 3, & 5; [0010]) including a dielectric layer (5 – fig. 5; [0010]), and internal electrode layers (3a-3c – fig. 5 & 8; [0012] & [0052]) disposed alternately in a first direction with the dielectric layer, and including first and second surfaces opposing each other in the first direction (2a & 2b – fig. 3 & 5; [0010]), third and fourth surfaces (2e & 2f – fig. 5 & 8; [0010]) connected to the first and second surfaces (2c & 2d – fig. 3 & 8; [0010]) and opposing each other in a second direction, and fifth and sixth surfaces connected to the first to fourth surfaces and opposing each other in a third direction; and first and second external electrodes (4a & 4b – fig. 1; [0012]) disposed on the third and fourth surfaces, respectively, wherein the internal electrode layer includes a first internal electrode layer (3a) and a second internal electrode layer (3c), wherein the first internal electrode layer includes a first internal electrode (3a) including a first main portion (31 – fig. 8; [0046-0047]) and a first lead portion (32 – fig. 8; [0046-0047]) extending from the first main portion, exposed to the third surface and connected to the first external electrode, and a first dummy electrode (6 – fig. 8; [0025]) spaced apart from the first internal electrode, exposed to the third surface and connected to the first external electrode, wherein the second internal electrode layer includes a second internal electrode (3c) including a second main portion (31 – fig. 8; [0046-0047] & [0052]) and a second lead portion (32 – fig. 8; [0046-0047] & [0052]) extending from the second main portion, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, and a second dummy electrode (6 – fig. 8; [0025] & [0052]) spaced apart from the second internal electrode, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, wherein a size in the third direction of a portion of the first lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the first main portion, and a size in the third direction of a portion of the second lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the second main portion (fig. 8), wherein the first dummy electrode does not overlap the second internal electrode in the first direction, and the second dummy electrode does not overlap the first internal electrode in the first direction (figs. 5 & 8), wherein at least a portion of the first dummy electrode overlaps the first internal electrode in the second direction, and at least a portion of the second dummy electrode overlaps the second internal electrode in the second direction (fig. 4c & 8), and wherein the first dummy electrode is disposed in only one of two opposing sides of the first lead portion in the third direction (fig. 8), and the second dummy electrode is disposed in only one of two opposing sides of the second lead portion in the third direction (fig. 8; [0052]). In regards to claim 2, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein the first and second lead portions are disposed adjacently to one of the fifth and sixth surfaces (fig. 8). In regards to claim 4, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein sizes in the third direction of exposed portions of the first and second lead portions are smaller than average sizes in the third direction of the first and second main portions, respectively (fig. 8). In regards to claim 5, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of each of distances at which the first and second internal electrode and the first and second dummy electrode are spaced apart from each other, respectively, is substantially constant (fig. 8 – it is noted that the portions near the end surface have a distance that is substantially constant). In regards to claim 6, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein the first and second dummy electrodes are further exposed to one of the fifth and sixth surfaces (fig. 8). In regards to claim 7, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 6, wherein the first external electrode is disposed to cover exposed portions of the first dummy electrode, and second external electrode is disposed to cover exposed portions of the second dummy electrode (fig. 8). In regards to claim 8, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein the internal electrode layer further includes a third internal electrode layer (3b – fig. 8) and a fourth internal electrode layer (3c having 3b design – fig. 5 & 8; [0052]), wherein the third internal electrode layer includes a third internal electrode (3b) including a third main portion (31 – fig. 8; [0046-0047]) and a third lead portion (32 – fig. 8; [0046-0047]) extending from the third main portion, exposed to the third surface and connected to the first external electrode, and a third dummy electrode (6 – fig. 8; [0025] & [0052]) spaced apart from the third internal electrode, exposed to the third surface, and connected to the first external electrode, wherein the fourth internal electrode layer includes a fourth internal electrode including a fourth main portion (31 – fig. 8; [0046-0047] & [0052]) and a fourth lead portion (32 – fig. 8; [0046-0047] & [0052]) extending from the fourth main portion, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, and a fourth dummy electrode (6 – fig. 8; [0025] & [0052]) spaced apart from the fourth internal electrode, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, wherein a size in the third direction of a portion of the third lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the third main portion, and a size in the third direction of a portion of the fourth lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the fourth main portion (fig. 8), wherein the third dummy electrode does not overlap the fourth internal electrode in the first direction, and the fourth dummy electrode does not overlap the third internal electrode in the first direction (fig. 5 & 8), wherein at least a portion of the third dummy electrode overlaps the third internal electrode in the second direction, and at least a portion of the fourth dummy electrode overlaps the fourth internal electrode in the second direction (fig. 4c & 8), and wherein the first lead portion is disposed closer to the fifth surface than the third lead portion, and the second lead portion is disposed closer to the fifth surface than the fourth lead portion (fig. 8). In regards to claim 9, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein the first internal electrode layer and the third internal electrode layer are symmetrical in the third direction with respect to a second direction axis (fig. 8), and wherein the second internal electrode layer and the fourth internal electrode layer are symmetrical in the third direction with respect to the second direction axis (fig. 8; [0052]). In regards to claim 10, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein the first to second lead portions are disposed adjacently to one of the fifth and sixth surfaces (fig. 8). In regards to claim 11, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein each of the first to fourth dummy electrodes is disposed in one of two opposing sides of a corresponding one of the first to fourth lead portions in the third direction (fig. 8; [0052]). In regards to claim 12, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein sizes in the third direction of exposed portions of the first to fourth lead portions are smaller than average sizes in the third direction of the first to fourth main portions, respectively (fig. 8). In regards to claim 12, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein at least a portion of distances at which the first to fourth internal electrodes and the first to fourth dummy electrodes are spaced apart from each other is substantially constant (fig. 8 – it is noted that the portions near the end surface have a distance that is substantially constant). In regards to claim 14, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 8, wherein the first to fourth dummy electrodes are further exposed to one of the fifth and sixth surfaces (fig. 8). In regards to claim 15, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 14, wherein the first external electrode is disposed to cover exposed portions of the first and third dummy electrodes, and the second external electrode is disposed to cover exposed portions of the third and fourth dummy electrodes (fig. 8). In regards to claim 17, Sato discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein a size in the third direction of at least one of the first and second lead portions gradually decreases toward a surface of the body in the second direction, and a size in the third direction of at least one of the first and second dummy electrodes gradually increases toward said surface of the body in the second direction (fig. 8), and the first lead portion and the first dummy electrode have inclined edges facing each other (fig. 8). Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5, & 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP20011108783A hereafter referred to as Aoki. In regards to claim 1, Aoki discloses A multilayer electronic component, comprising: a body (2 – fig. 1 & 7; [0021]) including a dielectric layer (5 – fig. 2; [0022]), and internal electrode layers (7C & 7D – fig. 5 & 7; [0032] & [0037]) disposed alternately in a first direction with the dielectric layer, and including first and second surfaces opposing each other in the first direction, third and fourth surfaces connected to the first and second surfaces and opposing each other in a second direction, and fifth and sixth surfaces connected to the first to fourth surfaces and opposing each other in a third direction (fig. 2, 5, & 7); and first and second external electrodes (3A & 3B – fig. 5 & 7; [0037]) disposed on the third and fourth surfaces, respectively, wherein the internal electrode layer includes a first internal electrode layer (7C) and a second internal electrode layer (7D), wherein the first internal electrode layer includes a first internal electrode (7C) including a first main portion (13C – fig. 5; [0040]) and a first lead portion (14D – fig. 5; [0047]) extending from the first main portion, exposed to the third surface and connected to the first external electrode, and a first dummy electrode (15A – fig. 5; [0047]) spaced apart from the first internal electrode, exposed to the third surface and connected to the first external electrode, wherein the second internal electrode layer includes a second internal electrode (7D) including a second main portion (13D – fig. 5; [0049]) and a second lead portion (14F – fig. 5; [0037]) extending from the second main portion, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, and a second dummy electrode (15B – fig. 5; ][0038]) spaced apart from the second internal electrode, exposed to the fourth surface and connected to the second external electrode, wherein a size in the third direction of a portion of the first lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the first main portion, and a size in the third direction of a portion of the second lead portion is smaller than a size in the third direction of the second main portion (fig. 5), wherein the first dummy electrode does not overlap the second internal electrode in the first direction, and the second dummy electrode does not overlap the first internal electrode in the first direction (figs. 5), wherein at least a portion of the first dummy electrode overlaps the first internal electrode in the second direction, and at least a portion of the second dummy electrode overlaps the second internal electrode in the second direction (fig. 5; [0040]), and wherein the first dummy electrode is disposed in only one of two opposing sides of the first lead portion in the third direction (fig. 5), and the second dummy electrode is disposed in only one of two opposing sides of the second lead portion in the third direction (fig. 5). In regards to claim 2, Aoki discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein the first and second lead portions are disposed adjacently to one of the fifth and sixth surfaces (fig. 5). In regards to claim 4, Aoki discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein sizes in the third direction of exposed portions of the first and second lead portions are smaller than average sizes in the third direction of the first and second main portions, respectively (fig. 5). In regards to claim 5, Aoki discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of each of distances at which the first and second internal electrode and the first and second dummy electrode are spaced apart from each other, respectively, is substantially constant (fig. 5 – portion in the third direction has distance that is substantially constant). In regards to claim 16, Aoki discloses The multilayer electronic component of claim 1, wherein a size in the third direction of at least one of the first and second lead portions is substantially constant, and a size in the third direction of at least one of the first and second dummy electrodes is substantially constant (fig. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 18 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not teach or suggest (in combination with the other claim limitations) wherein at least one of the first and second lead portions has two stepped portions from a side edge of a corresponding one of the first and second main portions with reduced sizes in the third direction, and at least one of the first and second dummy electrodes has two stepped portions matching the two stepped portions of a corresponding one of the first and second lead portions with increased sizes in the third direction (claim 18). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M SINCLAIR whose telephone number is (571)270-5068. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH from 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TIMOTHY J DOLE can be reached at (571)272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David M Sinclair/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 11, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770788
MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763266
INTEGRATED PASSIVE DEVICES WITH ENHANCED FORM FACTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763255
MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763254
CAPACITOR STRUCTURE
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763265
SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR AND CAPACITOR ARRAY
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.7%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1270 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month