Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/931,643

SYSTEM AND TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2023 — JP 2023-188869
Examiner
BATAILLE, FRANTZ
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
589 granted / 720 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
76.7%
+36.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 720 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Examiner acknowledges the following data: Parent data 18931643 filed 10/30/2024 claims foreign priority to 2023-188869, filed 11/02/2023. Information Disclosure statements The information disclosure statements (IDS) were submitted and filed on 10/30/2024 and 01/15/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishida et al (US 2024/0087339) in view of Senapathy (US 2023/0319426). Regarding claim 1, Ishida et al discloses system (fig. 1, item 1, system) constituting a wireless communication network (communication resources can be secured for communication of sound data output from the first speaker 140 via the first communication device 110, and voice communication can be maintained to a certain extent regardless of the quality of wireless communication, [0107],lines 19-21), the system (fig. 1, item 1, system) comprising a processor (fig. 1, item 320, processor), and the processor (fig. 1, item 320, processor) being configured to execute: receiving an acquisition request to acquire information indicating a travel direction of a detection target object (occupant P requests that the scenery in the travel direction (information indicating a travel direction) of the moving object M be provided, [0097], lines 3-5); and Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of transmitting, based on the acquisition request, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, the first sensing information including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of transmitting, based on the acquisition request, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, the first sensing information including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object (user device 102 may request a view (e.g., video output) at (1) from the virtual render generator 121. Before, during, and/or after the request by the user device 102, the user device 102 may send (transmit) positioning data comprising an initial position and optionally directional (travel direction), velocity, momentum, or other data corresponding to user movement to the position parser 124 at (2), [0098], lines 1-4). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of transmitting, based on the acquisition request, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, the first sensing information including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Regarding claim 2, Ishida et al discloses system (fig. 1, item 1, system) according, wherein the acquisition request includes a first ID, which is an ID of a first terminal, the first terminal being a terminal connected to the wireless communication network (When the communication device 310 has received a matching request from the user U via the second device 200 or from the occupant P via the first device 100, the matching processor 320 performs matching of the matching user U and the occupant P with reference to the user data 360, transmits communication identification information of the first device 100 of the occupant P to the second device 200 of the matching user U using the communication device 310, and transmits the communication identification information of the second device 200 of the user U to the first device 100 of the matching occupant P using the communication device 310, [0056], lines 1-6); and Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of processor transmits the travel direction of the detection target object determined with a travel direction of the first terminal as a reference, based on the first ID, including the travel direction in the first sensing information. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of processor transmits the travel direction of the detection target object determined with a travel direction of the first terminal as a reference, based on the first ID, including the travel direction in the first sensing information (virtual render generator 121 (or the user device 102) can transmit one or more frames or images to the object tracker 126 for use in object tracking. For example, the object tracker 126 can use artificial intelligence or other image processing techniques to identify a selected object in the received frame(s) or image(s) and to attempt to identify the same object in other frame(s) or image(s) captured by other sensor sources 130 other than the sensor source 130 that captured the received frame(s) or image(s), and as described herein, [0101], lines 3-8). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of processor transmits the travel direction of the detection target object determined with a travel direction of the first terminal as a reference, based on the first ID, including the travel direction in the first sensing information of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Regarding claim 3, Ishida et al discloses system (fig. 1, item 1, system) according, Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of wherein the processor judges, based on the first ID, whether travel directions of the first terminal and the detection target object are same or not, and transmits a result of the judgment as the information indicating the travel direction, including the result of the judgment in the first sensing information. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of wherein the processor judges, based on the first ID, whether travel directions of the first terminal and the detection target object are same or not, and transmits a result of the judgment as the information indicating the travel direction, including the result of the judgment in the first sensing information (The virtual render generator 121 may attempt to determine a frame or image captured at time 1/N that the object tracker 126 identified as depicting the object. If the virtual render generator 121 determines a frame or image that was captured at time 1/N that the object tracker 126 identified as depicting the object, then the virtual render generator 121 may cause the user device 102 to display the frame or image captured at time 1/N subsequent to the display of the initial frame or image displayed by the user device 102, [0065], lines 10-14). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of wherein the processor judges, based on the first ID, whether travel directions of the first terminal and the detection target object are same or not, and transmits a result of the judgment as the information indicating the travel direction, including the result of the judgment in the first sensing information of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Regarding claim 4, Ishida et al discloses system (fig. 1, item 1, system) according, Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of wherein the processor transmits a second ID, which is an ID of a second terminal in the same travel direction as the travel direction of the detection target object, as the information indicating the travel direction, including the second ID in the first sensing information. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of wherein the processor transmits a second ID, which is an ID of a second terminal in the same travel direction as the travel direction of the detection target object, as the information indicating the travel direction, including the second ID in the first sensing information (The object tracker 126 can be configured to identify one or more objects in one or more images captured by sensor sources 130 (e.g., cameras). For example, the request from a user device 102 to view a video stream or sequence of image(s) corresponding to an initial position may include an identification of an object to track. The identification can be in the form of a textual description of the object, a selection of an object from a menu of objects displayed by the user device 102, an identification of an object via a user gesture, an identification of an object via a voice command, an identification of an object via a button selection, and/or the like. The identification in the request can be forwarded by the location viewing system 120 to the object tracker 126, [0063], lines 1-7). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of wherein the processor transmits a second ID, which is an ID of a second terminal in the same travel direction as the travel direction of the detection target object, as the information indicating the travel direction, including the second ID in the first sensing information of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Regarding claim 5, Ishida et al discloses system (fig. 1, item 1, system) according, Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of wherein the processor transmits order of the detection target object having connected to a plurality of base stations as the information indicating the travel direction, including the order in the first sensing information. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of wherein the processor transmits order of the detection target object having connected to a plurality of base stations as the information indicating the travel direction, including the order in the first sensing information (The system also enables a user the ability to virtually travel to any captured environment. In one embodiment, a user may enter a mall like a shopping mall, and walk in any direction they want, go into a store or shop, and move around in any direction, look at the items in the shop, visualize the people moving around, interact with any person in the shop, converse with staff or any person (if the staff or persons are connected with the system), purchase and order any item and pay for it, order said item for delivery, and/or the like, [0087], lines 1-5). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of wherein the processor transmits order of the detection target object having connected to a plurality of base stations as the information indicating the travel direction, including the order in the first sensing information of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Regarding claim 6, Ishida et al discloses terminal executing (FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of an arrangement of a part of the first device (terminal) in a moving object M, [0038], line 1): transmitting an acquisition request to acquire information indicating a travel direction of a detection target object, to a core network (occupant P of the first device (terminal) sends a request to the network NW to provide scenery in the travel direction (information indicating a travel direction) of the moving object M, [0097], lines 3-5); and Ishida et al does not specifically disclose concept of acquiring, from the core network, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object. However, Senapathy specifically teaches concept of acquiring, from the core network, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object (user device 102 may request a view (e.g., video output) at (1) from the virtual render generator 121. Before, during, and/or after the request by the user device 102, the user device 102 may send (transmit) positioning data comprising an initial position and optionally directional (travel direction), velocity, momentum, or other data corresponding to user movement to the position parser 124 at (2), [0098], lines 1-4). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified system of Ishida et al with concept of acquiring, from the core network, first sensing information, which is a sensing result of the detection target object, including information indicating the travel direction of the detection target object of Senapathy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improve mapping tools that exist in which various street-level images of a location are captured, (Senapathy, [0003], line 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANTZ BATAILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-7286. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi Sarpong can be reached on 571-270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANTZ BATAILLE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696094
DETECTING WIRELESS DEVICES IN OR ON A VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696068
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684346
SECURED ACCESS TO IN-VEHICLE END NODES AND WAYS TO ENHANCE VEHICLE FUNCTIONALITY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684524
METHODS FOR POSITIONING DELEGATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677112
MENULESS OPERATIONS USING SPATIALLY AWARE TAGS WITH 3D VIRTUAL GEO-FENCING
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 720 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month