Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/931,949

COUPLER AND PACKAGING BOX

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — JP 2023-196407
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1475 granted / 1822 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§102
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§112
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1822 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Claim Objections Examiner notes that the claims fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.75(g) because the least restrictive claim, claim 18, is not presented as claim number 1. However, in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126, claim numbering must be preserved during prosecution. Therefore correction will be held in abeyance. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I shown in Figs. 2-9 in the reply filed on June 24, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 3, 5-6, 10 & 15-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on June 24, 2026. In the reply claim 3 was identified as reading on the elected species. However, the features of that claim are not shown in Figs. 2-9, but are described in the specification as pertaining to other or unelected species. See page 14, lines 2-4. In the reply claim 5 was identified as reading on the elected species. However, the features of that claim are not shown in Figs. 2-9, but are described in the specification as pertaining to other or unelected species. See page 26, lines 7-10. In the reply claim 10 was identified as reading on the elected species. However, the features of that claim are not shown in Figs. 2-9, but are described in the specification as pertaining to other or unelected species. See page 12, lines 26-30. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed July 13, 2026 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) because it does not include a concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each reference listed that is not in the English language. Applicant is advised that the date of any re-submission of any item of information contained in this information disclosure statement or the submission of any missing element(s) will be the date of submission for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements based on the time of filing the statement, including all certification requirements for statements under 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Drawings Figure 18 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation, “a first curved member having a convex shape in the removal direction, or a second curved member having a convex shape in the removal direction.” That which differentiates the first and second curved surfaces is unknown. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1-2, 4, 7, 9, 11-14 & 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Murphy, US 5.366,332. Murphy discloses a coupler (10) comprising: an insertion portion (13) to be inserted, through each of a first opening (40) of a first coupling object (38) and a second opening (40) of a second coupling object (36) overlapped with and upstream of the first coupling object, in an insertion direction (see “downward” at col. 6, line 37); a flange (12, 28) coupled to an upstream portion (14a) of the insertion portion in the insertion direction, the flange to contact an edge (see Fig. 4), adjacent to the second opening, of the second coupling object at the most upstream in the insertion position when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening; a hook (16) to sandwich the first coupling object and the second coupling object between the hook and the flange when the insertion portion is inserted into the first opening and the second opening (see Fig. 4); an elastic support (14b) supporting the hook displaceable in a direction orthogonal to the insertion direction (see “radially inward” at col. 6, line 45); and a removal force receiver (see “thin tool” at col. 7, line 21; and Figs. 3-4 show that the integrally connected (col. 6, line 6) pushrod 30 can function as a removal force receiver) coupled to the elastic support to: receive a removal force (see “force” at col. 7, line 21) in a removal direction opposite to the insertion direction; elastically deform (see “forced radially inward” at col. 7, line 21) the elastic support by the removal force; and displace the hook inward of the first opening and the second opening, to remove the insertion portion from the first opening and the second opening (col. 7, lines 23-29), wherein Figs. 1-4 show the insertion portion has a hollow shape having an inner space, and at col. 7, lines 17-21 the removal force receiver is disclosed as disposed in the inner space of the insertion portion, wherein the insertion portion includes a side wall (14a, 14b) supporting the elastic support, wherein Figs. 1-4 show multiple hooks (16) including the hook; and multiple elastic supports (14b) including the elastic support, the multiple elastic supports supporting the multiple hooks, wherein the removal force receiver couples a portion between the multiple elastic, supports, wherein Figs. 2-3 show a coupling position at which the removal force receiver (30) is coupled to the elastic support is located near a downstream side of the elastic support in the insertion direction, wherein Figs. 3-4 show the flange has a contact face (28) to contact a face of the second coupling object (36) at the extreme upstream position in the insertion direction when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening, wherein Figs. 1-4 show the hook (16) has a contact face to contact a face of the first coupling object (38) at an extreme downstream position in the insertion direction when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening, wherein Figs. 1-4 show the hook has a sloped flat face (22) facing a downstream side of the hook in the insertion direction. Claims 1-2, 4, 7-9, 11-14 & 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Diep, US 8.622,680. Diep discloses a coupler (10) comprising: an insertion portion (12, 32) to be inserted, through each of a first opening (57) of a first coupling object (38) and a second opening (27) of a second coupling object (26) overlapped with and upstream of the first coupling object, in an insertion direction (A); a flange (14) coupled to an upstream portion (12) of the insertion portion in the insertion direction, the flange to contact an edge (see Fig. 2), adjacent to the second opening, of the second coupling object at the most upstream in the insertion position when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening; a hook (36) to sandwich the first coupling object and the second coupling object between the hook and the flange when the insertion portion is inserted into the first opening and the second opening (see Fig. 2); an elastic support (16) supporting the hook displaceable in a direction orthogonal to the insertion direction (col. 2, line 58); and a removal force receiver (40, 44) coupled to the elastic support to: receive a removal force in a removal direction opposite to the insertion direction; elastically deform the elastic support by the removal force; and displace the hook inward of the first opening and the second opening, to remove the insertion portion from the first opening and the second opening (col. 4, lines 7-11), wherein Figs. 1-3 show the insertion portion has a hollow shape having an inner space (col. 2, lines 54-55), and Fig. 9 shows the removal force receiver is disposed in the inner space of the insertion portion, wherein the insertion portion includes a side wall (32) supporting the elastic support, wherein Figs. 1-3 show multiple hooks (36) including the hook; and multiple elastic supports (16) including the elastic support, the multiple elastic supports supporting the multiple hooks, wherein the removal force receiver couples a portion between the multiple elastic, supports, wherein the removal force receiver is a linear member (44) extending in a direction orthogonal to the insertion direction, wherein Fig. 9 shows a coupling position at which the removal force receiver (40, 44) is coupled to the elastic support is located near a downstream side of the elastic support in the insertion direction, wherein Fig. 2 shows the flange (14) has a contact face to contact a face (25) of the second coupling object (26) at the extreme upstream position in the insertion direction when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening, wherein Fig. 2 shows the hook (36) has a contact face to contact a face (37) of the first coupling object (38) at an extreme downstream position in the insertion direction when the insertion portion is inserted to the first opening and the second opening, wherein Fig. 2 shows the hook has a sloped flat face (34) facing a downstream side of the hook in the insertion direction. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Frush, Marshall, Bonnot and Schulze disclose couplers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Aug 09, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704154
PROTECTIVE COVER STRUCTURE FOR THE SLIP ASSEMBLY
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704152
CARDANICALLY FLEXIBLE COUPLING FOR TRANSMITTING HIGH AXIAL FORCES FOR DRIVE TRAINS IN WIND TURBINES
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698795
ROTOR SHAFT SYSTEM WITH INCREASED STIFFNESS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692904
TRIPOD TYPE CONSTANT VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692905
UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month