Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/932,020

DEVICES SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND ADDRESSING WORK MACHINE CONDITIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Examiner
LOUIE, WAE LENNY
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
675 granted / 796 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 796 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hunt et al. (2022/0304228). Regarding applicant claim 1, Hunt discloses a method for detecting header misalignment in a work machine, the method comprising: receiving work machine position data; receiving crop position data ([0017] “agricultural system may include one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis, and/or the spatial orientation of the header with respect to the crop rows, or ground/soil”); determining one or more alignment relationships between the work machine and the crop based on the work machine position data and the crop position data ([0017] “agricultural system may include one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis, and/or the spatial orientation of the header with respect to the crop rows, or ground/soil”); determining a misalignment state based at least in part on the alignment relationship; and modifying orientation of one or more of the work machine and the header based at least in part on the one or more alignment relationships and the misalignment state ([0017] “the actuators and steering system may be manipulate the steering components of the agricultural system, such as a set of wheels. The actuators and steering system may be manipulated in response to one or more stimuli to adjust the agricultural system to one or more environmental variables”; [0019]-[0021] “control system includes a controller configured to receive data from the sensors and to control operation of at least a portion of the agricultural system such as the alignment of the header with the crop row”). Regarding applicant claim 2, Hunt discloses wherein header position data comprises header angle orientation with respect to a work machine operation direction of travel ([0021]-[0022] “the controller may control the agricultural system e.g. header row alignment, header height, header angle or a combination thereof”). Regarding applicant claim 3, Hunt discloses wherein header position data comprises header lateral position with respect to a work machine operation direction of travel ([0021]-[0022] “the controller may control the agricultural system e.g. header row alignment, header height, header angle or a combination thereof”). Regarding applicant claim 4, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises work machine position with respect to an agricultural crop row ([0017] “crop row”). Regarding applicant claim 5, Hunt discloses wherein modifying the header orientation comprises changing lateral position with respect to an agricultural crop row ([0017] “one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis and/or the crop rows”). Regarding applicant claim 6, Hunt discloses wherein modifying the header orientation comprises modifying heading of the work machine ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 7, Hunt discloses wherein modifying header position comprises aligning the header to one or more rows of agricultural crop ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 8, Hunt discloses wherein modifying header position comprises steering the work machine to a desired field position ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 9, Hunt discloses further comprising stopping operation of the work machine ([0017] “actuators and steering may be manipulated in response to one or more stimuli to adjust the agricultural system to one or more environmental variables”). Regarding applicant claim 10, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises image data ([0014] “the harvester may be outfitted with a variety of sensors… may utilize data gathered from the sensors to adjust row alignment, header height, and header angle in response to the environment”). Regarding applicant claim 11, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises field map data ([0014] “the harvester may be outfitted with a variety of sensors… may utilize data gathered from the sensors to adjust row alignment, header height, and header angle in response to the environment”). Regarding applicant claim 12, Hunt discloses a system for detecting header misalignment in a work machine comprising: receiving work machine position data; receiving crop position data ([0017] “agricultural system may include one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis, and/or the spatial orientation of the header with respect to the crop rows, or ground/soil”); determining one or more alignment relationships between the work machine and the crop based on the work machine position data and the crop position data ([0017] “agricultural system may include one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis, and/or the spatial orientation of the header with respect to the crop rows, or ground/soil”); determining a misalignment state based at least in part on the alignment relationship; and modifying orientation of one or more of the work machine and the header based at least in part on the one or more alignment relationships and the misalignment state ([0017] “the actuators and steering system may be manipulate the steering components of the agricultural system, such as a set of wheels. The actuators and steering system may be manipulated in response to one or more stimuli to adjust the agricultural system to one or more environmental variables”; [0019]-[0021] “control system includes a controller configured to receive data from the sensors and to control operation of at least a portion of the agricultural system such as the alignment of the header with the crop row”). Regarding applicant claim 13, Hunt discloses wherein header position data comprises header angle orientation with respect to a work machine operation direction of travel ([0021]-[0022] “the controller may control the agricultural system e.g. header row alignment, header height, header angle or a combination thereof”). Regarding applicant claim 14, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises work machine position with respect to an agricultural crop row ([0017] “crop row”). Regarding applicant claim 15, Hunt discloses wherein modifying the header orientation comprises changing lateral position with respect to an agricultural crop row ([0017] “one or more actuators configured to manipulate the spatial orientation and/or position of the header with respect to the agricultural system chassis and/or the crop rows”). Regarding applicant claim 16, Hunt discloses wherein modifying the header orientation comprises modifying heading of the work machine ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 17, Hunt discloses wherein modifying header position comprises aligning the header to one or more rows of agricultural crop ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 18, Hunt discloses wherein modifying header position comprises steering the work machine to a desired field position ([0017]). Regarding applicant claim 19, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises image data ([0014] “the harvester may be outfitted with a variety of sensors… may utilize data gathered from the sensors to adjust row alignment, header height, and header angle in response to the environment”). Regarding applicant claim 20, Hunt discloses wherein field position data comprises field map data ([0014] “the harvester may be outfitted with a variety of sensors… may utilize data gathered from the sensors to adjust row alignment, header height, and header angle in response to the environment”). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAE LENNY LOUIE whose telephone number is (571)272-5195. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6AM-3PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, PETER D NOLAN can be reached at 571-270-7016. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /W.L.L/Examiner, Art Unit 3661 /PETER D NOLAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12654706
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRIVER CONTROL AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE CONTROL AT INTERSECTIONS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649505
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING ENFORCEABLE INSTRUCTIONS IN VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643542
VEHICLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637073
DRIVER-ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A VELOCITY OF A VEHICLE DURING AN APPROACH TO A TRAFFIC LIGHT
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622426
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FIELD TREATMENT AND MONITORING
4y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 796 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month