Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/932,765

COMPACT LUNG SIMULATOR AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Nov 01, 2023 — provisional 63/595,174
Examiner
LANE, DANIEL E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ingmar Medical LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
4%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
12%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 4% of cases
4%
Career Allowance Rate
12 granted / 312 resolved
-56.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
361
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§103
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 312 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions In order to advance prosecution, the restriction requirement is withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments are moot in light of the withdrawal of the restriction requirement. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 12 June 2025 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.98(a)(4) because it lacks the appropriate size fee assertion. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Drawings Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification A substitute specification excluding the claims is required pursuant to 37 CFR 1.125(a) because the specification is improperly formatted including at least missing paragraph numbers. A substitute specification must not contain new matter. The substitute specification must be submitted with markings showing all the changes relative to the immediate prior version of the specification of record. The text of any added subject matter must be shown by underlining the added text. The text of any deleted matter must be shown by strike-through except that double brackets placed before and after the deleted characters may be used to show deletion of five or fewer consecutive characters. The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by being placed within double brackets if strike-through cannot be easily perceived. An accompanying clean version (without markings) and a statement that the substitute specification contains no new matter must also be supplied. Numbering the paragraphs of the specification of record is not considered a change that must be shown. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The element “lockring” is written with the incorrect reference character “140” twice in pg. 10 of the specification. The element “piston” is written with the incorrect reference character “116” twice in pg. 19 of the specification. Appropriate correction is required. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-16 use the term “the”, “said”, or both “the” and “said”. It is unclear what difference in meaning is imparted with the use of one term as opposed to the other. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would not be apprised of the metes and bounds of the patent protection sought. For the purposes of compact prosecution, “the” and “said” are construed to have the same meaning. If this interpretation is correct, it is recommended to use only one of these terms throughout the claims to aid clarity. In other words, uniformity is recommended. Dependent claims 2-16 inherit the deficiencies of their respective parent claims, and are thus rejected under the same rationale. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gartin (US 1,612,185) discloses a piston member that is internally threaded which is driven by a lead screw that is fixed in the same manner as the instant claimed invention. East et al. (US 5,975,748) discloses the prior art illustrated in Fig. 1 and referenced in the instant specification. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL LANE whose telephone number is (303)297-4311. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 - 4:30 MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at (571) 272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL LANE/Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 11810474
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL PATHWAYS CREATION/REINFORCEMENT BY NEURAL DETECTION WITH VIRTUAL FEEDBACK
1y 10m to grant Granted Nov 07, 2023
Patent 11398160
SYSTEM, APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR EDUCATING AND REDUCING STRESS FOR PATIENTS WITH ILLNESS OR TRAUMA USING AN INTERACTIVE LOCATION-AWARE TOY AND A DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORK
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 26, 2022
Patent 11250723
VISUOSPATIAL DISORDERS DETECTION IN DEMENTIA USING A COMPUTER-GENERATED ENVIRONMENT BASED ON VOTING APPROACH OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
1y 3m to grant Granted Feb 15, 2022
Patent 11210961
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL PATHWAYS CREATION/REINFORCEMENT BY NEURAL DETECTION WITH VIRTUAL FEEDBACK
3y 9m to grant Granted Dec 28, 2021
Patent 11004551
SLEEP IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM, AND SLEEP IMPROVEMENT METHOD USING SAID SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted May 11, 2021
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
4%
Grant Probability
12%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 2m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month