Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/933,012

ARRANGEMENT FOR REPLACING ELEVATOR SUSPENSION ROPES AND A METHOD

Final Rejection §Other
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Jun 01, 2022 — continuation of PCTEP2022064922
Examiner
RIEGELMAN, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
KONE Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
749 granted / 961 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
988
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
75.3%
+35.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 10-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 5/5/2026. As an initial matter, Applicant has made the correct assumption that the restriction was intended to be presented under 35 USC 121. On page 9 of the Remarks, Applicant argues that the two inventions have overlapping features and therefore no serious burden exists for examining both invention. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Searching each invention would require searching fields not likely to produce art for the other invention(s) and therefore would pose a serious burden. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1-9 are patentable over the prior art of record because the teachings of the references taken as a whole do not show or render obvious the combination set forth in claim 1, including every structural element recited in the claims, especially, the configuration including a hoist and a rope gripper installable between a rope from among the one or more suspension ropes and the car, the hoist and the rope gripper configured to hold and elongate the rope during removal and installation of the rope. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest the elements of the elevator system as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7956. The examiner can normally be reached 8-6 EST Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Hodge can be reached at (571) 272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL A. RIEGELMAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3654 /MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §Other
Jan 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680605
UNIT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673848
STAIR LIFT SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSEMBLING, INSTALLING, AND USING SUCH SYSTEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662205
Lifting System for a Semitrailer of an Articulated Lorry, Logistics Depot for a Lorry Fleet, as Well as a Logistics System
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662829
PLATE ASSEMBLY FOR REMOVING A SECTION OF UNDERLYING SUBSTRATE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663071
REMOTE GEARBOX LUBRICANT LEVEL GAUGE SYSTEM FOR ROTORCRAFT
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month