Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026
Application No. 18/933,301

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF PRESS-FORMED PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2023 — JP 2023-198227
Examiner
KATCOFF, MATTHEW GORDON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Futaba Industrial Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 977 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 10,646,911 to Alpen et al (Alpen). Concerning claim 1, Alpen discloses a manufacturing method of a press-formed product including: a plate-shaped portion with a recessed part recessed in a first thickness direction of the plate-shaped portion; and a wall portion extending from an edge of the plate-shaped portion in a direction intersecting with the plate-shaped portion, the manufacturing method comprising: clamping a blank (M) having a plate shape by and between a first clamping structure (160) and a second clamping structure (140), the first clamping structure (160) being on a first side in a second thickness direction, which is a thickness direction of the blank (M), the second clamping structure (140) being on a second side opposite the first side in the second thickness direction with respect to the blank; forming the wall portion (E1 in the figure reproduced below) in the blank by performing press-forming on the blank (figure 1B, 1C) clamped by and between the first clamping structure (140) and the second clamping structure (160), the press-forming being performed by moving at least one of a first die (120) located on the first side with respect to the blank or a clamping/clamped body, which is a collection including the first clamping structure (160), the second clamping structure (140), the blank (M), and a second die (110), in a pressing direction that is parallel to the second thickness direction and that allows the first die to relatively come closer to the blank, the second die (110) being located on the second side with respect to the blank; and forming the plate-shaped portion with the recessed part (E2 in the figure reproduced below) in the blank by performing press-forming on the blank (M) that is in the process of having the wall portion formed therein (figures 1B and 1C), the press-forming being performed by further moving the at least one of the first die (120) or the clamping/clamped body in the pressing direction so as to allow the first die and the second die to come closer to each other. Concerning claim 2, Alpen discloses wherein the forming the wall portion (E1) in the blank includes forming the wall portion by moving the first die (120) in the pressing direction, and wherein the forming the plate-shaped portion with the recessed part (E2) in the blank includes forming the plate-shaped portion by further moving the first die (120) in the pressing direction so that the recessed part is formed in the blank by the first die (at 151) and the second die (at 131) coming closer to each other. Concerning claim 3, Alpen discloses wherein the plate-shaped portion (M) includes a first recessed part (E2) as the recessed part and a second recessed part (E3 in the figure reproduced below) recessed more shallowly in the first thickness direction than the first recessed part (E2), and wherein the clamping the blank includes clamping the blank by and between the first clamping structure (160) and the second clamping structure (140) to thereby form the second recessed part in the blank. Concerning claim 4, Alpen discloses wherein the clamping the blank includes clamping the blank by and between the first clamping structure (160) and the second clamping structure (140) at at least two points apart from each other in a direction perpendicular to the second thickness direction, wherein the at least two points include a first point and a second point, and wherein the forming the plate-shaped portion includes forming the recessed part in the blank by moving at least one of the first die or the second die such that a part of the at least one of the first die or the second die passes through in between the first point and the second point. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Alpen in view of U.S. Patent No. 10,213,819 to Ito et al (Ito). Concerning claim 5, Alpen does not disclose the specific material being used for the blank. Ito discloses a similar method wherein the blank is formed of a high tensile strength steel sheet (abstract). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan at the time of the invention to apply the method of Alpen to a blank formed of a high tensile strength steel sheet as such determination would result during routine engineering practices and experimentation. Accordingly, it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. See In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). As seen in Ito it is well known to press form high tensile strength steel sheets for automotive body structures to lighten the body structure while increasing its strength (column 1, lines 11-16). PNG media_image1.png 274 706 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 268 692 media_image2.png Greyscale Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The other art cited disclose other similar methods known in the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Matthew Katcoff whose telephone number is (571)270-1415. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 8-4, Fri: Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Templeton can be reached at (571) 270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Matthew Katcoff/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725 07/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12690528
LIMB CUTTING APPARATUS AND METHODS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691346
GOLF CLUB HEAD BENDING SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691454
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MOUNTING AND DEMOUNTING A LINER ELEMENT TO A MILL SHELL OF A MILL
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686146
ROTATABLE TOOL-ASSEMBLY FOR PROCESSING WOODEN PANELS AND THE LIKE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686013
Crusher for mineral materials or recycled materials
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 2m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month