Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/933,910

BABY CARRIER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2023 — CN 2023114560830
Examiner
ABRAHAM, TANIA
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
601 granted / 830 resolved
+2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
848
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the first fastener" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 16 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cone (US 5092004). Claim 1- Cone discloses a baby carrier, comprising: a base (26); a leg section (32) fixedly connected to the base; a backrest section (22) pivotably connected to the base; and a guider (60) configured for passage of a seat belt (62), wherein the guider comprises a first guider arranged in the leg section (fig. 1); the first guider comprises a body integrally formed with the leg section and having a pass-through opening (figs. 4-5). Claim 16- Cone discloses the baby carrier according to claim 1, wherein the guider further comprises a second guider arranged in the backrest section (figs. 6-8), the second guider comprises a base plate (152) and two arms (166, 166) extending from opposite ends (top and bottom) of the base plate (fig. 7). Claim 18- Cone discloses the baby carrier according to claim 1, further comprising an abutting structure (136, 138) arranged at an end of the leg section away from the backrest section (col. 7: 68- col. 8: 10); wherein the abutting structure has a first edge and a second edge at an angle to each other (shown in fig. 5, an edge of the first shoulder 136 is at an angle to the an edge of the second shoulder 138). Claim 19- Cone discloses the baby carrier according to claim 18, wherein the abutting structure (136, 138) is integrally formed with the leg section (fig. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7-15, 17 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA ABRAHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-2635. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID DUNN can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.A./Examiner, Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679256
SHOULDER STRAP RETAINER FOR CAR SEAT
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667204
Outdoor Seat with Integrated Protective Cover
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654815
PORTABLE BOAT SEAT MOUNTING SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643439
DEVICE FOR PREVENTING MIS-ROTATION AND SEAT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643441
CHILD SAFETY SEAT AND RELATED SPIN LOCK MECHANISM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month