Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/934,037

WHITE LIGHT ENGINE HAVING MODULAR AND INTERCHANGEABLE DESIGN

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Oct 31, 2023 — provisional 63/594,935 +2 more
Examiner
KRYUKOVA, ERIN
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
ERP Power LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
404 granted / 628 resolved
-3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
646
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
77.0%
+37.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 628 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/10/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/10/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. With regards to Claim 12, line 21 recites the limitation “wherein the opening overlapping the pedestal structure in a plan view”. It is unclear as to whether “the opening” refers to “the first layer opening” configured to accommodate the pedestal structure passing therethrough of Claim 12 lines 12-13 or the opening of the second layer of Claim 12 line 17. Furthermore, it is unclear as to whether the intent of the limitation is such that the particular opening is intended to overlap the pedestal structure in a plan view, whether the intent of the limitation is such that each the first layer opening and the opening of the second layer is intended to overlap the pedestal structure in a plan view, whether the intent of the limitation is such that the opening which overlaps the pedestal structure in plan view intends a further limitation, or whether another scope of the claim is intended. For the purpose of examination, the examiner understands this limitation such that the first opening overlaps the pedestal structure in plan view. The applicant is encouraged to clarify in the claim language the intended scope pertaining to the intended opening overlapping the pedestal structure in plan view, fully supported by the original disclosure. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7, 9-11, and 13-14 are allowed. Claim 12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. For the examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance, please see the Notice of Allowance mailed 12/16/2025. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIN KRYUKOVA whose telephone number is (571)272-3761. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a.m. - 4p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jong-Suk (James) Lee can be reached at 5712727044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIN KRYUKOVA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684915
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, SURFACE LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680668
INTEGRATED CEILING DEVICE WITH MECHANICAL ARRANGEMENT FOR A LIGHT SOURCE
11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669730
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663674
BACKLIGHT UNIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663673
LIGHT-MODULATING UNIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAME
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.8%)
2y 2m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 628 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month