Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/934,093

Mesh Fence

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 31, 2024
Priority
Nov 03, 2023 — NE 805195
Examiner
FERGUSON, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UMC Innovation Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
808 granted / 1274 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +73% interview lift
Without
With
+73.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1319
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1274 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1, claims 1-6 and 11, in the reply filed on July 20, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 9 and 10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on July 20, 2026. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1 (line 2) “including; ” should recite –including: --. For the purpose of examining the application, it is assumed that appropriate correction has been made. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Quinn (US 616,970) in view of Gapiand (FR 370 225). As to claims 1-4 and 11, Quinn discloses a mesh fence having a top and bottom, said fence including: a series of spaced vertical stay wires 2; a series of spaced horizontal line wires 1 that cross said stay wires and contact said stay wires at intersections, with at least some of the intersections of the stay wires and the line wires secured by a knot 3, wherein each of said stay wires is a continuous wire extending from the bottom of the fence to the top of the fence; wherein the line wires have an uppermost wire that is made of twisted wire; wherein each said line wires is made of twisted wire; and wherein each line wire is selected from a group consisting of: continuous twist wire and reverse twist wire (Figures 1-4). Quinn fails to discloses a mesh fence wherein each twisted line wire comprises barbed wire selected from a group consisting of: continuous twist barbed wire and reverse twist barbed wire. Gapiand teaches a mesh fence wherein each twisted line wire d comprises barbed wire selected from a group consisting of: continuous twist barbed wire and reverse twist barbed wire; barbs a on the twisted line wires providing for a more secure fence (Figures 1-4). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the mesh fence disclosed by Quinn wherein each twisted line wire comprises barbs, as taught by Gapiand, in order to provide for a more secure fence. As to claims 5 and 6, Quinn discloses a mesh fence wherein each of said intersections of each of said stay wires 2 and each of said line wires 1 are secured by a wire knot 3 (Figures 1-4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P FERGUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7081. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (10:00 am-7:00 pm EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Momper can be reached at (571)270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 07/28/26 /MICHAEL P FERGUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698634
RAILING CONNECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INSTALLING RAILING
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692883
JOINT STRUCTURE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690673
CONNECTING ASSEMBLY OF STORAGE RACK AND STORAGE RACK
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686979
Pedestrian Protective Barrier
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674484
STATIC LOAD COMPRESSION SPRING
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+73.0%)
2y 12m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1274 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month