Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/934,571

COMPACT HIGH FREQUENCY CLOCK GENERATION

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Examiner
BAE, JI H
Art Unit
2176
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ciena Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
636 granted / 776 resolved
+27.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites an FS/2 and FS/4 frequency clock. The use of FS is indefinite because it is merely an undefined variable and it is unclear how it further limits the functions of the frequency doubler. By definition, a frequency doubler outputs a signal at double the frequency of an input signal. The value of FS/2 is self-evidently twice the value of FS/4, so it is unclear how the inclusion of the values FS, FS/2, and FS/4 further limits the function of the frequency doubler without any further definition of FS. FS could therefore be reasonably interpreted as a placeholder for any arbitrary value, with FS/2 and FS/4 being arbitrary values by extension. Claims 10 and 14 are rejected on the same basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Parvizi et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0171425, in view of Lu et al., U.S. Patent No. 12,517,546. Regarding claim 1, Parvizi discloses a circuit comprising: a differential frequency doubler [Fig. 2: DFD 2120] configured to generate a differential FS/2 frequency clock [Differential FS/2 distribution 2200] from a differential FS/4 frequency clock [output of FS/4 PLL] using two clock phases as inputs [Fig. 5: DFD receives two differential FS/X clocks as inputs]. Parvizi does not disclose a multistage clock driver configured to correct asymmetry. Lu discloses a multistage clock driver configured to at least correct asymmetry [Fig. 1 vs. Fig. 4: skew introduces asymmetry in differential clocks] of a differential clock [Fig. 8: skew correction circuit; col. 9, lines 28-39: “The first skew correction circuits 724, 726 detects skew of a corresponding one of the pairs of pseudo-differential complementary clock signals clktp2, clktn2 and adjusts delay of received pseudo-differential complementary clock signals clktp1, clktn1 output from the first skew correction circuits 724, 726 to minimize and/or eliminate the skew. This results in aligned pseudo-differential complementary clock signals clktp2, clktn2, which are provided to the transmitters 706, 708. The transmitters 706, 708 implement CMOS signaling to transmit data based on the aligned pseudo-differential complementary clock signals clktp2, clktn2.”]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of Parvizi and Lu by modifying Parvizi to include the multistage clock driver of Lu. Both Parvizi and Lu are directed to inventions that distribute differential clocks for high speed applications. Lu teaches that skew in differential clock signals can have a negative impact on timing of component operations and detection of signal transitions [col. 8, lines 31-34], and discloses a circuit for correcting skew. It would therefore have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply the teachings of Lu to Parvizi based on Lu’s teachings that skew in differential clock signals negatively impacts performance, and also Lu’s teaching of a mechanism for correcting skew. Claim 10 recites a method executing the same functions as the circuit of claim 1, and is rejected on the same basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-9 and 11-13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Saputra et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2025/0211218, discloses a circuit for correcting skew in a single-ended to differential clock signal conversion circuit [Fig. 5, para. 0053]. Khan et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0339996, discloses a clock doubler circuit [Fig. 2]. Jiang et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0190848, discloses a frequency doubler and a circuit to adjust the symmetry of the frequency doubler output [para. 0162, Fig. 16]. Clara, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2017/0237419, discloses a circuit that receives a differential clock and compensates for skew at the input of a DAC [para. 0026]. Li et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0301913, discloses a circuit corrects duty cycles in a differential input clock and thereby corrects its symmetry [para. 0004, Fig. 3 and 4]. Dreps et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0181320, discloses a duty cycle adjustment circuit to correct for asymmetry in a differential clock signal [abstract]. Strom, U.S. Patent No. 6,066,972, discloses a circuit for correcting asymmetry in a differential clock signal [abstract]. Anderson, U.S. Patent No. 5,864,246, discloses a differential clock doubler circuit [Fig. 4 and 5]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JI H BAE whose telephone number is (571)272-7181. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday to Friday and every other Monday, 9 am to 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jaweed Abbaszadeh can be reached at 571-270-1640. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JI H BAE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2176 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Phone: 571-272-7181 Fax: 571-273-7181 ji.bae@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12656844
COLD DATA STORAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION EVALUATION AND RESPONSE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645272
PROCESSOR CLUSTER CONFIGURED TO MAXIMIZE UTILIZATION OF A PROCESSOR CORE ELECTRICALLY COUPLED DIRECTLY TO A POWER SOURCE AND RELATED METHODS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638906
System and Methods for Hardware Voting-Based Clock Control
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638893
HETEROGENEOUS PROCESSOR-BASED SYSTEM FOR DYNAMICALLY COUPLING POWER AND CLOCK TO A LAST LEVEL CACHE
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12613564
MOTION PATTERN RECOGNITION FOR DEVICE POWER POLICIES
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month