Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/934,662

SUPPORT STRUCTURE OF TOY FOR FIGURE PLAY

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2023 — JP 2023-188191
Examiner
HUSON, JOSHUA DANIEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Epoch Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allowance Rate
239 granted / 610 resolved
-20.8% vs TC avg
Strong +61% interview lift
Without
With
+60.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
89.4%
+49.4% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 6394030 to Geiger et al. In re claim 1, Geiger et al teaches a support structure of a toy for figure play, the support structure comprising: a supporting member 14 comprising a base end portion (14 closest to 12), a middle portion (14 middle) and a distal portion (14 closest to 16), and extending upward from the base end portion toward the middle portion and downward from the middle portion toward the distal end portion (14 is arched see figures 4-5), the distal end portion being configured to support a supported body 16, the base end portion comprising a contacting portion having an arcuate contacting surface 30 and an elastic locking portion 32, 31; and a fixing part 28 fixed to a main body 12 of the toy for figure play, the fixing part comprising a contacted portion 34 configured to contact the contacting portion and a locked portion 35 configured to be detachably locked to the elastic locking portion 32. In re claim 2, Geiger et al teaches the support structure of a toy for figure play according to claim 1, wherein the supporting member 14 is formed in an arc shape (Figures 4-5). In re claim 3, Geiger et al teaches the support structure of a toy for figure play according to claim 1, wherein the fixing part 28 has an opening portion (outside of 28), wherein the elastic locking portion 32 is provided on both sides of the contacting portion (Figure 17-20) with a slit interposed therebetween (Figure 17 see slit above 33), and wherein the locked portion 35 is provided at an edge portion of an opening portion. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious the combined limitations of applicants claimed invention. In particular the prior art of record is silent as to the rotation shaft as claimed in combination with the limitations of claim 1 and the releasing forces. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20010055931, 6305319, 2828963, 20050263084, 7202484, 9138655. The cited prior art teach various support structures that teach parts of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA DANIEL HUSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5301. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-330. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Thomas can be reached at (571) 272-8004. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA D HUSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668352
MULTIPLE LOAD PATH ACTUATOR WITH FAULT DETECTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668381
OMNIDIRECTIONAL VEHICLE WITH PASSIVE REVOLUTE JOINTS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654841
WING FOR AN AIRCRAFT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643663
PASSENGER SEAT WITH DECOUPLING MOTION MECHANISM FOR REDUCED MOBILITY SEATING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12612156
MAGNETIC WEIGHT ON WHEELS DETECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+60.6%)
2y 11m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month