Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/934,951

BATTERY PACK MODULE FOR HAUL TRUCK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Examiner
NEYZARI, OMID
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cummins Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
4 granted / 4 resolved
+48.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
11
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 4 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the word “tray” has been mistyped as “try”. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informality: “the primary cooling return line fluidly coupled to the layer supply cooling line” is not consistent with ¶[000115] of the specifications. The examiner has understood the excerpt as “the primary cooling return line fluidly coupled to the layer return cooling line”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6, and 8-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Borghi et al. (US 20220169125 A1), hereinafter "Borghi". Regarding claim 1, Borghi discloses a vehicle (electric vehicle 100, fig. 1, ¶[0046]) having a layered battery pack module (battery pack assembly 200, figs. 5A and 5C, ¶[0050]), the vehicle comprising: a first wheel (wheel 110, fig. 1, ¶[0048]) coupled to a first side of a chassis at a first forward position; a second wheel (any one of the wheels concentric to first rear axle 120B and on the same side of the vehicle as wheel 110) coupled to the first side of the chassis at a first rearward position; a support structure (battery frame assembly 106, figs. 1-2, ¶[0048]) of a battery pack module coupled to the first side of the chassis (“chassis 104 supports and is coupled to a battery frame assembly 106”, ¶[0048]) at a position between the first wheel and the second wheel, the battery pack module including a plurality of battery pack layers in a vertical arrangement (“battery pack assembly 200 comprises eight battery modules 300-1 through 300-8”, ¶[0076], layers of battery modules 300-1 through 300-8 shown in figs. 5A and 5C), each battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers including at least one battery pack (each of battery modules 300-1 through 300-8), wherein each battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers includes a tray operating line (any one of intermediate lines 410A and bridge bus bars 504-514, figs. 6A and 7C), each tray operating line coupled to each battery pack of the at least one battery pack of the corresponding battery pack layer (connection of intermediate lines and bridge bus bars to each battery module 300 described in ¶[0093] and ¶[0114] respectively), and each tray operating line extending to a first end of the battery pack module (intermediate lines 410A and bridge bus bars 504-514 extend to end of battery pack with manifold body outlet 420A, as shown in fig. 6A, and laminated bus bar assembly 502, as shown in fig. 5D, respectively); and a vertical operating cable (any one of manifold body outlet 420A and laminated bus bar assembly 502; note: “electrical contact assembly 500 is not limited in this regard and may comprise wires and/or cables in place of or in addition to bus bars”, ¶[0107]) extending vertically along at least a portion of the first end of the battery pack module to a first access point (junction box 600, figs. 5B and 7B; “laminated bus bar assembly 502 may be configured to permit current flow in either direction between battery modules 300 and junction box 600”, ¶[0108]); wherein the first access point is positioned within an access zone (the zone proximate to junction box panel 218 with a perimeter defined by flanges 230 and 232, fig. 4B, ¶[0063]) defined behind the first wheel. Regarding claim 2, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein each battery pack layer includes a plurality of battery packs, and each tray operating line couples each battery pack of the plurality of battery packs of the corresponding battery pack layer in series (“battery cells, battery modules, and battery packs may be electrically coupled to each other in series and/or parallel to increase voltage and/or current depending on electric vehicle 100 operation requirements”, ¶[0049]). Regarding claim 3, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein each battery pack layer includes a plurality of battery packs, and each tray operating line couples each battery pack of the plurality of battery packs of the corresponding battery pack layer in parallel (“battery cells, battery modules, and battery packs may be electrically coupled to each other in series and/or parallel to increase voltage and/or current depending on electric vehicle 100 operation requirements”, ¶[0049]). Regarding claim 4, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein each tray operating line (bridge bus bars 504-514, figs. 7A-C) and the vertical operating cable (laminated bus bar assembly 502, figs. 7A-C) are electronic cabling lines (“electrical contact assembly 500 is not limited in this regard and may comprise wires and/or cables in place of or in addition to bus bars”, ¶[0107]). Regarding claim 6 Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein the first access point (junction box 600) is a high voltage electrical box (“current may travel … out of junction box 600 to power high voltage systems”, ¶[0126]; high voltage connectors of junction box 600 further described in ¶[0127]). Regarding claim 8, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein each tray operating line (intermediate lines 410A, fig. 6A) and the vertical operating cable (manifold body outlet 420A, fig. 6A) are cooling lines (“manifold body outlets 420A are configured to direct coolant through each intermediate line 410A”, ¶[101]). Regarding claim 9, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein the access point (junction box 600, fig. 5B) is accessible from the access zone (the zone proximate to junction box panel 218 with a perimeter defined by flanges 230 and 232, fig. 4B) via a removable service panel (junction box panel 218 removable via fasteners as described in ¶[0067], fig. 5B) of the battery pack module. Regarding claim 10, Borghi discloses a battery pack module (battery pack assembly 200, figs. 5A and 5C, ¶[0050]) for a vehicle (electric vehicle 100, fig. 1, ¶[0046]), the battery pack module comprising: a front panel (first side panel 204, fig. 4B); a back panel positioned opposite of the front panel (“second side panel 206 opposite first side panel 204”, ¶[0058], fig. 4C); a first side panel (third side panel 208, fig. 4A) extending between the front panel and the back panel, the first side panel having a first service access (removal of panel 208 via fasteners attached to panels 214, 204, 206, and 216 as described in ¶[0067]; per Applicant’s disclosure “the entirety of a corresponding panel may service as a service access”, ¶[000117]); and a plurality of battery pack layers in a vertical arrangement (“battery pack assembly 200 comprises eight battery modules 300-1 through 300-8”, ¶[0076], layers of battery modules 300-1 through 300-8 shown in figs. 5A and 5C) within the front panel, the back panel, and the first side panel, each battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers including a battery pack (each of battery modules 300-1 through 300-8), wherein each battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers includes a tray operating line (any one of lines 410, 412 and bridge bus bars 504-514, figs. 6A and 7C), the tray operating line removably coupled to the battery pack (connection of intermediate lines and bridge bus bars to each battery module 300 described in ¶[0093] and ¶[0114] respectively) and being accessible via the first service access for disconnecting the tray operating line from the battery pack (removal of panel 208 provides access for disconnecting intermediate lines and bridge bus bars, figs. 4A and 5E). Regarding claim 11, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein the service access is one of a door, a portal (removal of panel 208 provides a portal for service; in light of specifications ¶[000118], service access may be defined within or by removal of the entirety of a sidewall panel), or a flap. Regarding claim 12, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, further comprising: a second side panel (fourth side panel 210, fig. 4D) extending between the front panel and the back panel opposite the first side panel (“fourth side panel 210 opposite third side panel 208”, ¶[0058]); a top panel (top panel 214, fig. 4F) extending between the front panel, the back panel, the first side panel, and the second side panel; and a second access (removal of panel 210 via fasteners attached to panels 214, 204, 206, and 216 as described in ¶[0067]; per Applicant’s disclosure “the entirety of a corresponding panel may service as a service access”, ¶[000117]) corresponding with one of the front panel, the back panel, the second side panel, and the top panel. Regarding claim 13, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein the tray operating line extends to a first end of the battery pack module (intermediate lines 410A and bridge bus bars 504-514 extend to end of battery pack with manifold body outlet 420A, as shown in fig. 6A, and laminated bus bar assembly 502, as shown in fig. 5D, respectively). Regarding claim 14, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 13, further comprising a vertical operating cable (any one of manifold body outlet 420A and laminated bus bar assembly 502; note: “electrical contact assembly 500 is not limited in this regard and may comprise wires and/or cables in place of or in addition to bus bars”, ¶[0107]) extending vertically along at least a portion of the first end of the battery pack module to a third access (junction box panel 218 removable via fasteners as described in ¶[0067], fig. 5B). Regarding claim 15, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein each battery pack layer includes a plurality of battery packs, and the tray operating line couples each battery pack of the plurality of battery packs of the corresponding battery pack layer in series (“battery cells, battery modules, and battery packs may be electrically coupled to each other in series and/or parallel to increase voltage and/or current depending on electric vehicle 100 operation requirements”, ¶[0049]). Regarding claim 16, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein each battery pack layer includes a plurality of battery packs, and the tray operating line couples each battery pack of the plurality of battery packs of the corresponding battery pack layer in parallel (“battery cells, battery modules, and battery packs may be electrically coupled to each other in series and/or parallel to increase voltage and/or current depending on electric vehicle 100 operation requirements”, ¶[0049]). Regarding claim 17, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein the tray operating line (bridge bus bars 504-514, figs. 7A-C) is an electronic cabling line (“electrical contact assembly 500 is not limited in this regard and may comprise wires and/or cables in place of or in addition to bus bars”, ¶[0107]). Regarding claim 18, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 10, wherein the tray operating line (lines 410 and 412) includes: a layer supply branch cooling line (distribution lines 412A) fluidly coupled to a layer supply cooling line (intermediate lines 410A), the layer supply cooling line corresponding with a battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers (intermediate lines 410A-1 through 410A-7 corresponding with battery modules 300-1 through 300-7, figs. 5A and 6A); and a layer return branch cooling line (distribution lines 412B) fluidly coupled to a layer return cooling line (intermediate lines 410B), the layer return cooling line corresponding with the battery pack layer of the plurality of battery pack layers (intermediate lines 410B-1 through 410B-7 corresponding with battery modules 300-1 through 300-7, figs. 5A and 6A). Regarding claim 19, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 18, wherein the battery pack layer (each of battery modules 300, figs. 5A and 5C) includes a plurality of battery packs (“battery modules 300 contain one or more secondary battery cells”, ¶[0075]), a plurality of layer supply branch cooling lines (distribution lines 412A), and a plurality of layer return branch cooling lines (distribution lines 412B) so that: each layer supply branch cooling line of the plurality of layer supply branch cooling lines corresponds with one battery pack of the plurality of battery packs (each of distribution lines 412A-1 through 412A-14 correspond with battery cells of battery modules 300, ¶[0095], figs. 5A and 6A); each layer return branch cooling line of the plurality of layer return branch cooling lines corresponds with one battery pack of the plurality of battery packs (each of distribution lines 412B-1 through 412B-14 correspond with battery cells of battery modules 300, ¶[0096], figs. 5A and 6A); the layer supply cooling line is fluidly coupled to each layer supply branch cooling line of the plurality of layer supply branch cooling lines (coupling of each intermediate line 410A to a pair of distribution lines 412A as shown in fig. 6A); and the layer return cooling line is fluidly coupled to each layer return branch cooling line of the plurality of layer return branch cooling lines (coupling of each intermediate line 410B to a pair of distribution lines 412B as shown in figs. 6A and 6C). Regarding claim 20, Borghi discloses the battery pack module of claim 18, further comprising: a primary cooling supply line (manifold body 408A, fig. 6B), the primary cooling supply line fluidly coupled to a coolant fluid source (manifold body 408A “configured to receive coolant from vehicle thermal system” by way of pack inlet 404A and first main line 406A, ¶[0091], fig. 6B) and the layer supply cooling line (manifold body 408A shown coupled to each intermediate line 410A in fig. 6A); and a primary cooling return line (manifold body 408B, fig. 6B), the primary cooling return line fluidly coupled to the layer return cooling line (manifold body 408B shown coupled to each intermediate line 410B in figs. 6A and 6B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Borghi as applied to claim 4 above, and further in view of Adachi et al. (US 2014/0011058 A1), hereinafter "Adachi". Regarding claim 5, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 4, wherein each tray operating line (bridge bus bars 504-514, figs. 7A-C) is coupled to the vertical operating cable (laminated bus bar assembly 502, figs. 7A-C), but Borghi does not recite the coupling established via a high voltage electrical interface box. Adachi teaches a battery pack module for vehicles including a plurality of battery pack layers in a vertical arrangement (¶[0011], figs. 11-15) wherein each battery cell (single cells 41) is coupled to bus bars (bus bars 61 to 66) via a high voltage electrical interface box (interface box formed by insulation cover 43 and exhaust duct 44 surrounding openings 67 for connection of terminals 51 and 52 to bus bars 61 to 66, figs. 11-12, ¶[0133]). Before the effective date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art to combine, with a reasonable expectation of success, the interface box from Adachi with the battery pack assembly disclosed by Borghi. The motivation would have been to ensure “the gas inside a battery is discharged outside the battery when the internal pressure of the single cell becomes abnormal” (Adachi, ¶[0114]). The combination would predictably achieve the desired result. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Borghi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Middleton et al. (US 2022/0077441 A1), hereinafter “Middleton”. Regarding claim 7, Borghi discloses the vehicle of claim 1, comprising a first access point (junction box 600, figs. 5B and 7B), but Borghi does not recite the first access point positioned on an upper mounting surface of the battery pack module. Middleton teaches a battery housing assembly (battery box 214, ¶[0022], figs. 3-9) for an industrial vehicle, including a plurality of battery pack layers in a vertical arrangement (rows 431 and 432 containing battery modules 441 and 442, fig. 4, ¶[0025]) wherein the assembly comprises a first access point (top portion 601 containing contactors 446-7 and 750-7, figs. 6-7, ¶[0030]) positioned on an upper mounting surface (“contactors 446, 447 and other high-voltage components may be positioned at a top portion of battery box 214”, ¶[0028], fig. 9). Before the effective date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art to substitute, with a reasonable expectation of success, the first access point location from Middleton for the first access point location disclosed by Borghi. Middleton recites the motivation as establishing an arrangement where “the lower portion of battery box 214 may be accessed to conduct maintenance and repair on battery box 214 without a technician having to be close to the dangerous high voltage components”. The substitution would predictably achieve the desired result. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Additional art of record relates to battery packs having features relevant to the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMAD OMID NEYZARI whose telephone number is (571)272-9530. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8 AM-5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMAD OMID NEYZARI/Examiner, Art Unit 3613 /JAMES A SHRIVER II/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 4 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month