Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/935,398

WIRE HARNESS ROUTING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Priority
Nov 14, 2023 — JP 2023-194009
Examiner
BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1427 granted / 1677 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1705
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1677 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2014/175048 in view of Yamaguchi et al. (US 2020/0180525). WO 2014/175048 discloses a wire harness routing structure comprising a flat routing member (9) that has flexibility and a pair of elastic members (11,12), as shown in Figure 1. The elastic members can be formed from urethane, as disclosed in the sixth paragraph of the Soundproof Sheet section of the translation. Urethane is a known elastomer. The flat routing member (9) is fixed to a panel (6) that partitions one section of a vehicle and a vehicle interior in a state of being sandwiched between the pair of elastic members (11,12), as shown in Figures 1-4 and disclosed in the first paragraph of the Interior Parts section of the translation. In reference to claim 2, the pair of elastic members (11,12) include sound absorbing materials that suppress a sound of the engine room from entering the vehicle interior. The elastic members (11,12) form sound deadening sheet (1). In reference to claims 3 and 4, the flat routing member (9) is disposed between an air conditioning unit (63) and the exterior structure of the vehicle, as shown in Figure 1. However, WO 2014/175048 does not explicitly disclose the panel is a dash panel. Yamaguchi et al. teaches attaching a wire harness routing structure (10) to a dash panel (80) separating an engine room from a vehicle interior, as shown in Figures 1-3. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to attach the wire harness routing structure of WO 2014/175048 to a dash panel separating an engine room from a vehicle interior, as taught by Yamaguchi et al., with a reasonable expectation for success to reduce noise in the passenger cabin while providing a protective routing structure for wires extending between the engine compartment and the passenger cabin. Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of WO 2014/175048 and Yamaguchi et al. (US 2020/0180525), as applied to claims 1 and 2, in view of Demo et al. (US 2014/0265413). WO 2014/175048, as modified, does not disclose fixing the elastic members to the dash panel via adhesive. Demo et al. teaches using adhesive instead of mechanical fasteners to attach to attach sound deadening material to a dash panel/firewall, as discloses in paragraphs [0016-0017]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use adhesive instead of the mechanical fasteners to attach the elastic members of WO 2014/175048 to the dash panel, as modified, as taught by Demo et al., with a reasonable expectation for success as an alternative attachment that is less likely to rattle and cause noise. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claims 5 and 6 is the groove portion formed in the dash panel having a shape along an outer shape of the flat routing member. The closest prior art, WO 2014/175048, does not form a shape that could correspond to a groove in the dash panel. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY A BLANKENSHIP whose telephone number is (571)272-6656. The examiner can normally be reached 7-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GREGORY A. BLANKENSHIP Primary Examiner Art Unit 3612 /GREGORY A BLANKENSHIP/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612 August 19, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746982
POWERED VEHICLE TAILGATE ASSEMBLY HAVING A DOOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746706
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED ENDOSKELETON-BASED TRANSPORT STRUCTURES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742298
Towable Crash-Attenuating Vehicle
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734984
A BUMPER BEAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735126
AIR-GUIDING ELEMENT AND MOTOR VEHICLE COMPRISING AN AIR-GUIDING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month