Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/935,786

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOTOR BASED POWER TRANSFER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 04, 2024
Examiner
ORTIZ, ELIM
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
470 granted / 594 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
616
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.6%
+22.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/05/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments, see page 8, filed 02/05/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 2, 9, 10 11 and 17 under 35 USC § 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Welchko in the same field teaches that the two windings of Su can be electrically isolated and therefore the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module as amended by applicant. All other remarks are considered yet not found persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 9, 10 11 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Su (US 2014/0097792) in view of Welchko (US 8269434). Regarding claim 1, Su teaches a power transfer system (see Fig. 4), comprising: a traction battery pack (see 102 Fig. 4); a power inverter module configured to receive a high-voltage direct current from the traction battery pack and convert the high-voltage direct current into an alternating current that is configured to be received by an alternating current bus (see 302, Fig. 4); a rotary electric machine in electrical communication with the alternating current bus, wherein the rotary electric machine is a segmented winding machine and includes a first set of windings in electrical communication with the alternating current bus a second set of winding in electrical communication with an output alternating current bus (see a single electric drive assembly (e.g., in a motor/generator configuration) that includes two sets of three-phase stator windings para 0028-0030, Fig. 4), a power outlet in electrical communication with the second set of windings through the output alternating current bus (see Fig. 4); and a controller in electrical communication with the power inverter module, wherein the controller is configured to: selectively direct the power inverter module to direct the alternating current through the alternating current bus to the rotary electric machine to generate a desired output power at the power outlet (see para 0021 Fig. 4). However, Su does not disclose the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module. Yet, Welchko in the same field of automotive drive system and methods for making the same teach the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module (see line 35-50, Col 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Su with the teachings of Welchko having the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module, by electrically separating (isolating) the windings in order to prevent disturbances to damage equipment and other sensitive devises and limiting these disturbances to devices that can tolerate these disturbances. Regarding claim 2, the combination teaches the power transfer system the rotary electric machine includes a three-phase rotary electric machine, and the first set of windings are electrically isolated from the output alternating current bus (see line 35-50, Col 4). Yet the combination does not disclose the first set of windings are low-turn windings and the second set of windings are high-turn windings, However, Mandel in the same filed teaches that it known in the field to select the number of windings as desired (see para 0062 and 0073). Therefore, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the combination in order to have the first set of windings are low-turn windings and the second set of windings are high-turn windings, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or working range involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. In this case, Mandel teaches that the number of turns for each layer is completely variable depending on the intended use of the device. Therefore, optimizing the winding turns such that the first set of windings are low-turn windings and the second set of windings are high-turn windings would have been obvious over Mandel Regarding claim 9, the combination teaches wherein the desired output power includes a single phase alternating current (see 120V or 240V at 106; Fig. 4) and the second set of windings includes two sets of windings (see motor of Fig. 4). Regarding claim 10, the combination in view of Mandel disclose wherein the second set of windings include between 8 and 10 times as many turns as the first set of windings (Please see the rejection of claim 2 and 18 above). Regarding claim 11, Su teaches a method of performing power transfer, the method comprising: directing a power inverter module to convert direct current from a traction battery pack from a direct current bus into a three-phase alternating current received by an alternating current bus (see para 0021 Fig. 4); directing the three-phase alternating current into a rotary electric machine, wherein the rotary electric machine is a segmented winding machine and includes a first set of windings in electrical communication with the alternating current bus a second set of winding in electrical communication with an output alternating current bus (see a single electric drive assembly (e.g., in a motor/generator configuration) that includes two sets of three-phase stator windings para 0028-0030, Fig. 4) and directing an alternating current generated in the second set of windings through the output alternating current bus to a power outlet (see 106, Fig. 4). However, Su does not disclose the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module. Yet, Welchko in the same field of automotive drive system and methods for making the same teach the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module (see line 35-50, Col 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Su with the teachings of Welchko having the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module, by electrically separating (isolating) the windings in order to prevent disturbances to damage equipment and other sensitive devises and limiting these disturbances to devices that can tolerate these disturbances. Regarding claim 17, Su teaches a vehicle (see para 0012) comprising: a vehicle body supported by a plurality of wheels (see hybrid electric vehicle); a traction battery pack fixed relative to the vehicle body (see 102, Fig. 4); a power inverter module configured to receive a high-voltage direct current from the traction battery pack and convert the high-voltage direct current into an alternating current that is configured to be received by an alternating current bus (see 302, Fig. 4); a rotary electric machine in electrical communication with the alternating current bus and configured to drive the plurality of wheels through a drivetrain (see motor, Fig. 4), wherein the rotary electric machine is a segmented winding machine and includes a first set of windings in electrical communication with the alternating current bus a second set of winding in electrical communication with an output alternating current bus (see a single electric drive assembly (e.g., in a motor/generator configuration) that includes two sets of three-phase stator windings para 0028-0030, Fig. 4) a power outlet in electrical communication with the second set of windings through the output alternating current bus (see 106, Fig. 4); and a controller in electrical communication with the power inverter module, wherein the controller is configured to: selectively direct the power inverter module to direct the alternating current through the alternating current bus to the rotary electric machine to generate a desired output power at the power outlet (see para 0021 Fig. 4). However, Su does not disclose the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module. Yet, Welchko in the same field of automotive drive system and methods for making the same teach the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module (see line 35-50, Col 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Su with the teachings of Welchko having the second set of windings is electrically isolated from the power inverter module, by electrically separating (isolating) the windings in order to prevent disturbances to damage equipment and other sensitive devises and limiting these disturbances to devices that can tolerate these disturbances. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 12 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim an any intervening claims. Claims 4-8, 13-16, 19 and 20 are dependent of claims 3, 12 and 18 respectively and allowable. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIM ORTIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7114. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIM ORTIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741168
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE ROUTING FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744406
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING ELECTRIC POWER
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741604
POWER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND A METHOD FOR OPERATING A POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744387
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734931
BATTERY SYSTEM
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month