Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/936,401

Customizable Shower Caddy

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 04, 2024
Priority
May 18, 2020 — continuation of 11/825,940 +1 more
Examiner
CHAN, KO HUNG
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
House Of Atlas LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
862 granted / 1293 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1293 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/29/2026 has been entered. The indicated allowability of claims 29-27 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Twellman (US 4693188 A). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 29-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Twellman (US 4693188 A). With respect to claim 29, Twellman discloses a connector comprising: a body (14) including an opening to receive a support rod (10) therethrough; a wedge (44) insertable in its entirety into the body (14) and having an annular body; a rotational lock (30) including an opening to receive the support rod (10) therethrough and being engageable with at least a portion of the wedge (32 engageable with wedge 44), the rotational lock having a first end (32) insertable within the body, wherein the rotational lock (30) rotatably attaches to the body such that rotation of the rotational lock causes the rotational lock to apply pressure to the wedge to lock the body to the support rod, wherein the rotational lock has the first end (32) and a second end (upper end of 30 opposite 32) along a longitudinal axis thereof, wherein the first end (32) of the rotational lock is disposed inside the body (14) when the rotational lock is rotated. With respect to claim 30, Twellmann discloses the connector of claim 29 as advanced above, wherein the wedge (44) has a conical surface (see conical surface of 44 receiving conical surface of 32 in the figure), and the rotational lock (30) engages the conical surface of the wedge to lock the body to the support rod when the rotational lock is rotated. With respect to claim 31, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 30 as advanced above, wherein the rotational lock (30) comprises a conical portion (conical portion of 32) that engages the conical surface of the wedge (44). With respect to claim 32, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 29 as advanced above, wherein the wedge (44) includes teeth (48, 54). With respect to claim 33, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 29 as advanced above, wherein the body and the rotational lock (30) include threads (40) such that the rotational lock is threadable to the body to bring the rotational lock into engagement with the wedge (column 3, lines 25-40). With respect to claim 34, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 29 as advanced above, wherein the body supports a product holder (12). With respect to claim 35, Twellman discloses a connector comprising: a body (14) including an opening to receive a support rod (10) therethrough; a wedge (24); a lock (30) including an opening to receive the support rod (10) therethrough and at least a portion of the wedge (24), the lock including a first portion having threading (40) sized to be inserted within the body (14) and a second portion (top portion of 30) that protrudes from the body when the first portion is inserted into the body, wherein the lock rotatably attaches to the body such that rotation of the lock causes the lock to apply pressure to the wedge (24) to lock the body to the support rod (10). With respect to claim 36, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 35 as advanced above, wherein the wedge (24) has a conical surface, the lock (30) engaging the conical surface of the wedge to lock the body to the support rod when the lock is rotated. With respect to claim 37, Twellman discloses the connector of claim 36 as advanced above, wherein the lock (30) comprises a conical portion (ribs 34 around upper portion of 32) that engages the conical surface of the wedge (24). Claim 38 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 29-38 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ko (Korie) H Chan whose telephone number is (571)272-6816. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday -Friday, 8:00 - 5:00 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached on 571-272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Ko H Chan/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631 Khc
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723710
Vertical Support Arrangement for an Optical System
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714250
Article Support System
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12698048
LIFT SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12667207
Wall Storage System
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660955
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR ORGANIZING HATS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1293 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month