Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/937,532

TRANSMITTING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 05, 2024
Examiner
YU, LIHONG
Art Unit
2631
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 816 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
64.6%
+24.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 816 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-3 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. US 12,170,587 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because: Instant Application: 18/937,532 US 12,170,587 B2 1. A transmission method according to Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the transmission method comprising: selecting a pattern from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers to subcarrier groups; mapping data groups onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM); and transmitting allocation information and the mapped data groups according to OFDM, the allocation information indicating the selected pattern, wherein the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. 1. A transmission method according to Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the transmission method comprising: selecting a pattern from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers to subcarrier groups; mapping data groups onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM); and transmitting allocation information and the mapped data groups according to OFDM, the allocation information indicating the selected pattern, wherein the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the fixed OFDM subcarriers are fixed in a frequency direction, and a data group among the data groups is mapped onto the fixed subcarrier group, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. 2. A transmission device according to Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the transmission device comprising: circuitry configured to: select a pattern from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers to subcarrier groups; and map data groups onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM); and a transmitter configured to transmit allocation information and the mapped data groups according to OFDM, the allocation information indicating the selected pattern, wherein the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. 2. A transmission device according to Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the transmission device comprising: circuitry configured to: select a pattern from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers to subcarrier groups; and map data groups onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM); and a transmitter configured to transmit allocation information and the mapped data groups according to OFDM, the allocation information indicating the selected pattern, wherein the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the fixed OFDM subcarriers are fixed in a frequency direction, and a data group among the data groups is mapped onto the fixed subcarrier group, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. 3. A receiving device comprising: a receiver configured to receive allocation information and mapped data groups according to Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM), the allocation information indicating a selected pattern; and a circuitry configured to demodulate the allocation information and the mapped data groups, wherein the selected pattern is a pattern selected from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of OFDM subcarriers to subcarrier groups, the mapped data groups are data groups mapped onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. 3. A receiving device comprising: a receiver configured to receive allocation information and mapped data groups according to Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM), the allocation information indicating a selected pattern; and a circuitry configured to demodulate the allocation information and the mapped data groups, wherein the selected pattern is a pattern selected from among resource allocation patterns, the resource allocation patterns defining respective allocations of OFDM subcarriers to subcarrier groups, the mapped data groups are data groups mapped onto the subcarrier groups according to the selected pattern to perform Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM), the subcarrier groups include a fixed subcarrier group having fixed OFDM subcarriers regardless of the selected pattern, the fixed OFDM subcarriers are fixed in a frequency direction, and a data group among the data groups is mapped onto the fixed subcarrier group, the number of the fixed OFDM subcarriers is fixed regardless of the selected pattern, and the allocations of the OFDM subcarriers defined by the respective resource allocation patterns are mutually different in a frequency direction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIHONG YU whose telephone number is (571)270-5147. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 am-6:00 pm EST Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah S. Wang can be reached at (571)272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIHONG YU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603667
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND CORRECTING PASSIVE INTERMODULATION (PIM)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597937
REDUCE DCO FREQUENCY OVERLAP-INDUCED LIMIT CYCLE IN HYBRID AND DIGITAL PLLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12574130
IMPROVEMENT OF LINEAR BEAM SWEEPING IN HIGH SPEED SCENARIOS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567893
Baseband Unit, Radio Unit and Methods in a Wireless Communications Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562855
TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING AND CONTROL OF HIGH SPEED SERIAL COMMUNICATION LINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 816 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month